Can I say I have to give Gallant credit for convincing Kreider this crease player role is how he will become successful? A new, experienced coach telling Kreider: "Look, you have an eye for the game, you're big, strong, fast, tough to contain from your strength, but... your passing isn't that great, your shot isn't that great either and your skills beating goalies on breakaways aren't that awesome either, you can't beat guys 1 on 1, but what do you have? You're big, you know how to use your skates, you know how to deflect pucks and you can read plays. So why don't you think of yourself as a bigger, more skilled version of Holmström?"
And here we are. Kreider is the best crease player I've seen in a long time. He's great at screening goalies, he's not slow to get there because he can skate and support a backcheck or puck retrieval, he can play physical, he's a big pile of meat to move, he can deflect, he knows how to place his stick, he can swap in rebounds, he knows how to beat a sprawling goalie.
I love it. So, can I say Gallant turned Kreider's contract from questionable into a steal? Is it allowed to be that positive? If a guy can jump out of a pool, he can be a good net presence guy. Especially with good hands, not just good enough to be an effective perimeter player. And NYR has loads of those.
Kreider's role switch has created a potential star player from being a core player not bringing enough. Panarin has jokingly said "Kreider doesn't know what to do when he's not around the crease." and by the standards of Panarin, I think he's right, even if he's joking. It's when Kreider greets the goalie and tells him this shift will be hell that Kreider is in his element.