Player Discussion Chris Kreider: Part III

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Honestly, and I'm probably in the minority here, but I think there's a better than 50/50 shot that Kakko's production just about replaces Kreider's by next season.

20-25 goals and 45-50 points is very realistic for Kaapo after an offseason of workouts geared towards fitting him into the NHL.
I think that saying that a 19 year old that will not turn 20 until February is going to produce as a legit top line player is a bit of a stretch. At least to me. I believe that 25 goals is a pipe dream for him for next year. Again, YES, I believe that Kakko will eventually be a cornerstone. But that will probably not happen for his first couple of years in the league.
 
Just doing some stat-surfing on Kreider.

He has already got his second-most PP TOI in a season, and in that has already scored 2 more PPGs than his career high and is two shots below his career high.

I don't think that does anything to discount his performance. Just an observation of how much more valuable he is when we have a strong PP and a coach who leans on the top unit.
 
A gamble makes it sound as if it could of easily gone either way with regards to who would come out better.

Everybody knew who had come out the better of the trade immediately, though. We just ended up coming out much, much better than anybody could of anticipated.

The Rangers were still competitive at the time and they traded for a guy who had ended his previous season as an inferior player.

I don’t think there was tremendous downside or anything. But it could have not worked out.

I’m not sure why this is even being debated though. I said from the get-go that it was a good trade - probably Gorton’s best.
 
The Rangers were still competitive at the time and they traded for a guy who had ended his previous season as an inferior player.

I don’t think there was tremendous downside or anything. But it could have not worked out.

I’m not sure why this is even being debated though. I said from the get-go that it was a good trade - probably Gorton’s best.

A good "gamble". That's where I took exception.

It wasn't a gamble. In my opinion.

But I digress.
 
By the time the kids earn a big contract, the cap will be high enough that it won't matter. If someone has to be moved, move Skjei.

Kreider could easily have a career similar to Marleau. I don't think many Sharks fans would tell you they regret keeping Marleau at 29.
What did the Sharks win by keeping MArleau at 29 ?
 
I don't think that does anything to discount his performance. Just an observation of how much more valuable he is when we have a strong PP and a coach who leans on the top unit.
There have been some very memorable players who have made entire livings on as bodies in front of the net.


Kreider is quite a dilema. We all know what he is and even (at least the more level headed of us) what he isn't. However, what there is no dollar value to is what he brings in the locker room and off the ice. Add on to that as you point out, him being used exactly this way on the PP, where he could probably continue to operate for years after his speed is diminished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belford22 and jas
Players like Kakko, Fox, DeAngelo, Chytil won't get any better? Kakko doesn't need to have a "big step" Another 10-15 points would be great for his development.
Of course it would be great for his development. May just not be realistic.

And I expect all of those players to take steps forward. The only question is what is reality based
 
What did the Sharks win by keeping MArleau at 29 ?
Multiple chances at a cup?

Just because he didn't win doesn't mean he didn't give the team a chance. 1 team wins each year. It's a travesty that Joe and Marleau haven't won, but that doesn't change that they're both going to get their numbers retired and are 2 of the most beloved players in that teams history.
 
Of course it would be great for his development. May just not be realistic.

And I expect all of those players to take steps forward. The only question is what is reality based
Indeed. But i don't think 10-15 points is out of the question or being at all unrealistic for Kakko. I think he will have a great offseason and be much more prepared for the NHL next season. Though nothing against him this year, he had a lot going on last year/summer and had no real idea how to prepare for hockey in the NHL, plus he was 18 and there were more adjustments he had to make this year aside from just hockey.

Everyone else should continue to improve a bit as well.
 
Multiple chances at a cup?

Just because he didn't win doesn't mean he didn't give the team a chance. 1 team wins each year. It's a travesty that Joe and Marleau haven't won, but that doesn't change that they're both going to get their numbers retired and are 2 of the most beloved players in that teams history.
LOL...maybe they also would have been better without him and won a couple of Cups...goes both ways....No man knows ! Just speculation .
 
Just doing some stat-surfing on Kreider.

He has already got his second-most PP TOI in a season, and in that has already scored 2 more PPGs than his career high and is two shots below his career high.

I don't think that does anything to discount his performance. Just an observation of how much more valuable he is when we have a strong PP and a coach who leans on the top unit.
I'd argue that DeAngelo, the team finally having a legit PP QB, has a lot to do with higher goal/point totals on the PP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rongomania
From age 29 -36 Marleau had 71, 83, 73, 64, 31 (48 games), 70, 53 and 48 point seasons. I think it’s safe to say he wasn’t holding San Jose back from winning.
You can say it true enough....you just can't back it up with facts . They won no Cups with him ...that is a fact . Anything else is speculation ...should have / could have means diddly squat .....and the rest is just wishful thinking .
 
You'd hope he'd be fine. At the end of the day and in this type of business, players move.
I think he means chemistry wise. I understand that there those who are excited to trade him but it’s ok to also admit that he does leave a void with how he plays and how that effects other players
 
You can say it true enough....you just can't back it up with facts . They won no Cups with him ...that is a fact . Anything else is speculation ...should have / could have means diddly squat .....and the rest is just wishful thinking .

I mean, by this logic the Rangers should have traded Lundqvist at the 2013 deadline.
 
You can say it true enough....you just can't back it up with facts . They won no Cups with him ...that is a fact . Anything else is speculation ...should have / could have means diddly squat .....and the rest is just wishful thinking .

So, San Jose didn't win a Cup because of Marleau? 1/19th of the equation if my math is right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
Will be fascinating to see what Sakic does at the deadline now that Rantanen is out for 6-8 weeks with a possible broken clavicale according to Adrian Dater of the Denver Post who is their "Uncle Larry".

With Kadri and Calvert out also, it's possible Sakic might blink a bit and give us a bit more than he wanted to in return for Kreider who would be quite a nice band aid for the time being to help. the Avs withstand their injury situation. And than when their walking wounded come back which should be before the playoffs, Kreider could be the guy to put them over the top!

I for one was hoping before their pretty significant injury situation we could get more than just Jost and a 1st from the Avs. Now I'd like to think Gorton will be savvy enough to not make Sakic think he's being taken advantage of due to their situation and hopefully finesse someone better than Jost as the extra piece necessary to get a deal done.

We shalt see soon enough and tho I'd love to see if we could finagle Newhook from them and that would have been an impossibility before tonight's unfortunate Rantanen injury, if the Avs want to make a run at a very winnable West with the Blues looking a bit vulnerable and the Stars maybe their next best opponent, maybe the Avs do blink and send us Newhook if we sweeten the deal a bit adding a bit more to just Kreider....hmmmm....Monday can't get here soon enough!!
 
Last edited:
Indeed. But i don't think 10-15 points is out of the question or being at all unrealistic for Kakko. I think he will have a great offseason and be much more prepared for the NHL next season.
Again, I have no doubts that he will do what needs to be done and take steps forward. I however will haircut expectations, just by looking at the probabilities in teenagers making such leaps.
Though nothing against him this year, he had a lot going on last year/summer and had no real idea how to prepare for hockey in the NHL, plus he was 18 and there were more adjustments he had to make this year aside from just hockey.
I think that most young players mention preparation as something they learn once in the league. I will say that hes production for this year is not just a result of not preparing as he would in the future. It is a case of what to expect out of teens playing in the best league in the world.
Everyone else should continue to improve a bit as well.
That certainly is the hope and what the rebuild rests on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Crypto Guy
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad