CHL/NCAA

RB76

Registered User
Aug 22, 2023
92
107
Everything is moving fast but there is little doubt the CHL is going to expect players to honour their contract and play their four years or risk loosing their school package.

And I really don't see the NCAA competing directly with the CHL for players but instead offering continuing development for the remaining 99% of players who do not sign a pro contract.

The NCAA D1 programs have resources and facilities better than most CHL / AHL and some NHL teams. Factor in all the intangibles including education, training, experience, NIL, etc and I doubt the kids will have any hesitation in choosing the NCAA route if offered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fergus31

donjohnson

Registered User
Jan 29, 2013
352
376
Everything is moving fast but there is little doubt the CHL is going to expect players to honour their contract and play their four years or risk loosing their school package.
This is clarified in the FAQs

 
  • Like
Reactions: RB76

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,168
671
Toronto, ON.
The way I see it, USHL and the OJHL/Jr. B is ideal for most 16/17 year olds. Elite players of that age can play either USNTDP or OHL and can graduate to NCAA or Pro early.

This new rule will drain some 19/20 year old players to the NCAA, but this is not the super elite but like 2nd tier players.

More 18/19 year olds that are drafted but not signed should land in the OHL
I really like how London isn’t afraid to use Jr B for even some of their higher end prospects, rather than playing depth roles as a 16 year old. Worked well for Cowan, Bonk and now Mitchell seems to be another good example. I’ve liked him a lot at the U17’s so far playing with his peers.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad