CHL/NCAA

RB76

Registered User
Aug 22, 2023
92
108
Everything is moving fast but there is little doubt the CHL is going to expect players to honour their contract and play their four years or risk loosing their school package.

And I really don't see the NCAA competing directly with the CHL for players but instead offering continuing development for the remaining 99% of players who do not sign a pro contract.

The NCAA D1 programs have resources and facilities better than most CHL / AHL and some NHL teams. Factor in all the intangibles including education, training, experience, NIL, etc and I doubt the kids will have any hesitation in choosing the NCAA route if offered.
 

donjohnson

Registered User
Jan 29, 2013
352
376
Everything is moving fast but there is little doubt the CHL is going to expect players to honour their contract and play their four years or risk loosing their school package.
This is clarified in the FAQs

 
  • Like
Reactions: RB76

Leviathan899

Registered User
Nov 17, 2014
1,182
684
Toronto, ON.
The way I see it, USHL and the OJHL/Jr. B is ideal for most 16/17 year olds. Elite players of that age can play either USNTDP or OHL and can graduate to NCAA or Pro early.

This new rule will drain some 19/20 year old players to the NCAA, but this is not the super elite but like 2nd tier players.

More 18/19 year olds that are drafted but not signed should land in the OHL
I really like how London isn’t afraid to use Jr B for even some of their higher end prospects, rather than playing depth roles as a 16 year old. Worked well for Cowan, Bonk and now Mitchell seems to be another good example. I’ve liked him a lot at the U17’s so far playing with his peers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OMG67

coolhandluc44

Registered User
Jan 29, 2024
96
81
I really like how London isn’t afraid to use Jr B for even some of their higher end prospects, rather than playing depth roles as a 16 year old. Worked well for Cowan, Bonk and now Mitchell seems to be another good example. I’ve liked him a lot at the U17’s so far playing with his peers.
The thing about London also is that they have a reputation and track record that as a young player you can feel confident in. It also does not hurt to say listen we will bring you up for a few games to get some experience and you also wont loose a year of your education funding (for those that care) but your main focus is going to be in Junior B for the year
 

Generalsupdates

@GeneralsUpdates on Twitter
Sep 4, 2017
7,538
4,726
Very interested to see how teams play this. If you're getting a young player for 2 years and your team isn't good, would be hard to justify giving that player PP time and top line minutes, knowing he's going to leave your team after 2 years and then when you are ready to win, he's gone and now all those PP reps you used on him would've been better off used to get someone else ready for your win window
 

cruickshankd

Registered User
Jun 3, 2024
87
84
Very interested to see how teams play this. If you're getting a young player for 2 years and your team isn't good, would be hard to justify giving that player PP time and top line minutes, knowing he's going to leave your team after 2 years and then when you are ready to win, he's gone and now all those PP reps you used on him would've been better off used to get someone else ready for your win window
Once you got him it is up to you to make him want to stay!!
 

coolhandluc44

Registered User
Jan 29, 2024
96
81
Once you got him it is up to you to make him want to stay!
You also have to wonder that now with a CHL player pool to choose from how many of those previous commitments won’t be honoured by NCAA teams.

For example Mason Roy who signed in Owen Sound. He committed to Providence College. Providence College now has this expanded player pool to choose from. So if Mason fails to impress Providence could walk away him and Mason waiting to go to Providence College could have all been for nothing. Maybe he catches on with another team but nothing is a given.

If I were a players agent, I would advise my client to get on an CHL team even if the end goal is NCAA. With more players to choose from and moving forward the CHL hypothetically getting the best Under 19 players I think there will be more pressure to prove you’re skills in the CHL first to NCAA teams and also to have a fall back education option should you not catch on to an NCAA team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ward Cornell

RayzorIsDull

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,670
3,443
bp on hfboards
Very interested to see how teams play this. If you're getting a young player for 2 years and your team isn't good, would be hard to justify giving that player PP time and top line minutes, knowing he's going to leave your team after 2 years and then when you are ready to win, he's gone and now all those PP reps you used on him would've been better off used to get someone else ready for your win window
I guess. I find it interesting from roster management. If a player is in the OHL and has plans on NCAA if he's going there would he ever accept a trade? He could easily jump to the NCAA. That can prevent OHL teams making moves. OHL teams may take more chances now at US players as well. It will be more wild west for the OHL but it's been that in the NCAA for a few years now. You either adjust or get left behind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ward Cornell

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad