That's correct. He got an assist for basically touching the puck in the neutral zone. Ideally, we would want to see more for points scored.Pretty sure Stramel is #15, the one forcing the turnover.
That's correct. He got an assist for basically touching the puck in the neutral zone. Ideally, we would want to see more for points scored.Pretty sure Stramel is #15, the one forcing the turnover.
That's correct. He got an assist for basically touching the puck in the neutral zone. Ideally, we would want to see more for points scored.
He was much better in the faceoff department in game 2. 3/15 (20%) on Friday. 15/27 (55.6%) on Saturday.Stramel strikes me as the kind of player that is in-between realizing what he’ll need “to be” in order to be a regular NHL’er. I would like to see him focusing on 2-3 things and becoming good/great at them. Winning board battles, defensive IQ, and face off expert… he can do it! Don’t let being the “#1 center” make you something you’re not. As much as that can be taken sarcastically… I mean it.
Agreed. My expectations is low so as long as he can develop into a Mark Jankowski/Radek Faksa/Brian Boyle type, centering a disruptive fouth line.Stramel strikes me as the kind of player that is in-between realizing what he’ll need “to be” in order to be a regular NHL’er. I would like to see him focusing on 2-3 things and becoming good/great at them. Winning board battles, defensive IQ, and face off expert… he can do it! Don’t let being the “#1 center” make you something you’re not. As much as that can be taken sarcastically… I mean it.
And the crazy thing was that there were other, much better choices available, who also had size and played C.Drafting for position and size, no good.
Had to go back and refresh my memory on those. He did do really well at a few things: 2023 NHL Combine results: Top 10 prospects in every drillAnd the crazy thing was that there were other, much better choices available, who also had size and played C.
Stramel really scored really well in Combine tests, also.
Had to go back and refresh my memory on those. He did do really well at a few things: 2023 NHL Combine results: Top 10 prospects in every drill
Definitely a big strong kid.
However, a test like "pro agility" saw, for instance, Bradly Nadeau do well. (He subsequently had 46 points in 37 games as a college freshman and turned pro.)
Has anyone done a meaningful analysis about how any of these results actually translate to NHL success? My hunch is that there's a very weak correlation between standing long jump, for example, and NHL success. Some of these just seem like very weird things to even measure, let alone make a decision off of.
A friend of mine always looked for the kids who didn't play summer hockey as opposed to those who were on the ice all summer. His feeling was that they came into fall camps with far more room to improve, while the kids who played all summer were already in mid season form.Do Combine Results and Draft Status Really Matter?
We often hear about young hockey players that perform really well at team tryout camps and combines in the summer months. In my opinion players and parents spend far too much time and money trying to attend these things.www.prohockeystrength.com
Interesting quote: “It has also been suggested that because scouts already have a good idea of how players are ranked on the basis of game play, if deciding between two equally ranked players, scouts may actually choose a player who scores lower on a given test. In theory, if a player has significant room to improve on a particular physical attribute compared with an equally ranked rival, he can be coached to work on his weakness, thus raising it to a level equal to or better than, the other player."
I saw that, and felt bad.Calum Ritchie starting for the Avs tonight.
Calum Ritchie starting for the Avs tonight.
Yeah, who would want to play for the Avs? Blech!I saw that, and felt bad.
The opportunity was likely driven by Avs expected returning veterans. In spite of Ritchie’s seeming “not readiness”, kid had some flashes.And he's a -3? I wouldn't be surprised if he got a few games and then sent back down, but really it doesn't mean that much if he's in the NHL already or not.
Newhook joined the Avalanche before Boldy joined the Wild, and we all saw how that went down for the Avalanche.
With that said, I still think Stramel was a Godawful pick and I don't think he'll amount to much. At this point, he's the next Zach Phillips with the chance of being the next Colton Gillies. It was a bad pick then and worse now.
Their forward lineup is actually not that great either. It wouldn’t surprise me if they were below the Wild in the standings.Yeah, who would want to play for the Avs? Blech!
Does anyone still have hope for this guy? I'm at the point where I think it's a lost cause. And that's extremely frightening only one year later.
^ And by that I mean more than a tweener/4th line guy
Does anyone still have hope for this guy? I'm at the point where I think it's a lost cause. And that's extremely frightening only one year later.
^ And by that I mean more than a tweener/4th line guy