Fopppa
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2009
- 2,581
- 1,330
Hah! There are a couple more good ones in there (Carlo especially), but I chuckled. And I’m not one to bring up that draft you’re inferring. Savagely balanced post. Kudos!2 for 16, not bad.
Hah! There are a couple more good ones in there (Carlo especially), but I chuckled. And I’m not one to bring up that draft you’re inferring. Savagely balanced post. Kudos!2 for 16, not bad.
Hey Don, you do realize that the deal was for Charlie McAvoy, right, not Charlie Coyle?Love charlie but what a rip off. That agent took donny to the woodshed. I'm surprised he buckled. Charlie is solid but not at 9.5 wish it was 8.5.
I was referring to the 16 picks over the ‘15/‘16 drafts, so was counting Mcavoy and Carlo as his two hits in that span.Hah! There are a couple more good ones in there (Carlo especially), but I chuckled. And I’m not one to bring up that draft you’re inferring. Savagely balanced post. Kudos!
Except when they're broadcasting the Bruins' game....Cesspool radio, I hope they all run down the toilet.
8.5 was fair. It's ok we overpaid now get rid off some dead weight like moore etc.Hey Don, you do realize that the deal was for Charlie McAvoy, right, not Charlie Coyle?
Love charlie but what a rip off. That agent took donny to the woodshed. I'm surprised he buckled. Charlie is solid but not at 9.5 wish it was 8.5.
If charlie got 10 mil that would have shut down hf boards of how ridiculous that contract would be.Wrong take, Tkachuk's agent took the Sens to the woodshed, to pay a LW who is nowhere close to a PPG player and not good defensively 8.2 mil/year is a bad deal. McAvoy is a top 5 defenseman who plays in all situations, is arguably the best 5x5 player defenseman in the league. Be thankful that Cassidy didn't use him on the #1 PP unit until late in the year or else he may have gotten $10 mil/year.
Wags is only 225k against the cap now that he’s burried.8.5 was the ideal number . 1 mil over I feel but easily can be absorbed if we can dump wags .
If charlie got 10 mil that would have shut down hf boards of how ridiculous that contract would be.
Alright, I apologize. Misread the original post a little bit. If that’s your stance I’d argue Lauzon, DeBrusk are decent picks. Vladar, Steen are ok as well.I was referring to the 16 picks over the ‘15/‘16 drafts, so was counting Mcavoy and Carlo as his two hits in that span.
Even at 50-55 for me.If he puts up 65-70 points and continues to excel at 5x5 play he would easily be worth 10 mil/year.
Congratulations to Keith Gretzky here lost in all this
he hit big on Pastrnak 2014 & McAvoy 2016 before going to Edmonton
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.telegram.com/sports/20160802/keith-gretzky-leaves-bruins-accepts-assistant-gm-position-in-edmonton?template=ampart
Gretzky oversaw three drafts for the B's, with 2014 first-rounder David Pastrnak (No. 25 overall) currently on the NHL roster. A series of trades left Gretzky with 16 picks over the 2015 and '16 drafts, nine of those in Rounds One or Two.
Lol3 for 16, my mistake.
For sure, some decent ones in there, but it’s easier to ignore the almost hitsAlright, I apologize. Misread the original post a little bit. If that’s your stance I’d argue Lauzon, DeBrusk are decent picks. Vladar, Steen are ok as well.
Two Elite players is pretty amazing it’s not as good as four (Pastrnak , Barzal, Connor, McAvoy)Why am I sucking my teeth here?
Yeah not bad, bottom pairing Dman. We can give him a half thereLol
Lauzon looks pretty good in 2 games I watched
Two Elite players is pretty amazing it’s not as good as four (Pastrnak , Barzal, Connor, McAvoy)
When Nurse got $9.5 you knew McAvoy was at least getting this8.5 was the ideal number . 1 mil over I feel but easily can be absorbed if we can dump wags .
You see the problem then, good .
Pasta & McAvoy are at a different level from Barzal and Conner.
Can't get it right in the draft all the time.