Player Discussion Charlie Coyle

Status
Not open for further replies.

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,369
45,633
At the Cross
youtu.be
Well time will tell but let's just say we aren't seeing the same thing. While no two players are identical there are a bunch like JFK, Bjork, Donato when he was here who brought the same things. Nobody was at all similar to what Coyle brings. I wish Donato luck, not bitter at all but I feel Coyle is a better fit and brings an element that was sorely missing on this team.

I get the deal I would have done it as well.
 

RedeyeRocketeer

Registered User
Jan 11, 2012
10,445
1,492
Canada
In a 7 game series where your 3rd line is often going to match up against Johnsson-Matthews-Kapanen (51 even strength goals and counting), who would you rather have on the line?

Coyle, or Donato?

I know who I pick. I think only a crazy person picks the other.

And this is question we'll ask for years to come. The Leafs and Tampa forward will always be 3+ lines deep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pay Carl

False Start

Registered User
May 8, 2018
747
758
In a 7 game series where your 3rd line is often going to match up against Johnsson-Matthews-Kapanen (51 even strength goals and counting), who would you rather have on the line?

Coyle, or Donato?

I know who I pick. I think only a crazy person picks the other.

And this is question we'll ask for years to come. The Leafs and Tampa forward will always be 3+ lines deep.

I mean, it's as obvious for Boston as it is for Minny.

I would take Coyle and Minny would take Donato.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDJ and Chief Nine

RussellmaniaKW

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
19,729
21,853
I agree that Bjork had more upside than Donato, but Bjork has some serious miles on him already with the injuries.

I'd say Bjork has the better tools overall (what an awesome skater), but Donato at this point in time is far more likely to be an NHL regular for years to come.

As for saying Donato was by far the best Bruins forward prospect...idk if I'd put him ahead of Studnicka, but it's kind of a loaded statement anyway because all the best young Bruins forwards were already playing in the NHL (Pasta, Debrusk, Heinen). If Donato was the best of anything he was the "best of the rest"
 

veganbruin

Registered User
Sep 20, 2013
3,301
3,568
Boston, MA
In a 7 game series where your 3rd line is often going to match up against Johnsson-Matthews-Kapanen (51 even strength goals and counting), who would you rather have on the line?

Coyle, or Donato?

I know who I pick. I think only a crazy person picks the other.

And this is question we'll ask for years to come. The Leafs and Tampa forward will always be 3+ lines deep.

I hate the trade. I agree with this sentiment 100%. But you can’t look at in a vaccuum of Donato or Coyle. Of course Donato wasn’t going to realistically be on our playoff roster(although with the top6 injuries he would be welcome). The problem is they could have paid a much lower price for a more productive or same production option as Coyle.
 

KrejciMVP

Registered User
Jun 30, 2011
28,806
10,571
Tampa, Florida
I hate the trade. I agree with this sentiment 100%. But you can’t look at in a vaccuum of Donato or Coyle. Of course Donato wasn’t going to realistically be on our playoff roster(although with the top6 injuries he would be welcome). The problem is they could have paid a much lower price for a more productive or same production option as Coyle.

Agree, if we're talking about a player who is a puck possession specialist you can get that for much less in price. I don't think the Bruins had puck possession in mind when they aquired Coyle as they are looking for depth scoring so they don't have to rely so much on Krejci and Bergeron in a 7 game series. If the Bruins are in a playoff game down 2-0 and need to score and the 1st line is being shut down, they need a 3rd line which will produce offense. They have time to get the 3rd line more in sync so not really worried right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: veganbruin

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,380
New England
I hate the trade. I agree with this sentiment 100%. But you can’t look at in a vaccuum of Donato or Coyle. Of course Donato wasn’t going to realistically be on our playoff roster(although with the top6 injuries he would be welcome). The problem is they could have paid a much lower price for a more productive or same production option as Coyle.

Like who? The only other center that stands out to me that was traded on TDL day was Derick Brassard and he has 1 more point than Coyle does. Coyle is also under contract for another season at a fair price which gives him more value as a piece moving forward.
 

TCB

Registered User
Dec 15, 2017
13,186
23,464
North Of The Border
Agree, if we're talking about a player who is a puck possession specialist you can get that for much less in price. I don't think the Bruins had puck possession in mind when they aquired Coyle as they are looking for depth scoring so they don't have to rely so much on Krejci and Bergeron in a 7 game series. If the Bruins are in a playoff game down 2-0 and need to score and the 1st line is being shut down, they need a 3rd line which will produce offense. They have time to get the 3rd line more in sync so not really worried right now.

Thats what Im waiting for.

No way am I going to judge Coyle point production on playing with the likes of Backes and Nordstrom, but once MoJo,Pasta and DeBrusk returns and more than likely Heinen drops down to the third line, I'd expect some improvement in the offensive department.

He's playing well, I think if you place him on he right-wing with Bergy and Marchand his point totals would be similar to Heinen, but he's more suitable for this team as a third line center and because of who's he's been playing with to-date, I think it would be grossly unfair to judge him on his point production alone.
 

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
12,687
7,194
Visit site
Are people actually surprised by his play? If so, you shouldn't be. He's simply not a very productive player.

Wellat the same time since he has been here he has had linemates like Cehlarik, Backes, and Nordstrom. Quite simply no one is going to be productive with those guys as linemates
 

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
Are people actually surprised by his play? If so, you shouldn't be. He's simply not a very productive player.

he was on an unprecedented career worst pointless slump... but im sure if we watched him in the past that would be the 'norm'

I mean if we actually didnt want to seem a bit ridiculous we could look at his true point production over his career

it seems he has 243 points in 487 games. if you are as bad at math as you might be in your hottakes I will point out thats an average of .5ppg or an expectation of a point every 2 games played.

this is reality... tough for some people to accept. its quite an unexpected slump to see him go 14 games without a point. yes... it happened. but to call this the norm is jokingly laughable

he had 22 points in his first 41 games this season [half a year} so to say the game suddenly passed him by is stupid. hes in a career worst scoring slump, but this is a guy with the talent/history to let us expect a 40-45 point season as a norm. and remember, hes always been considered an underperformer. the experts believe his skills should produce more. 40-45 is the reality that has already been accomplished, but we can easily hope he realizes his potential and gives us more
 

gvkmedia

Let’s fight through this….
Mar 2, 2002
3,849
506
Kingsville
www.hollandbloorview.ca
Coyle is a big body. Controls the puck well. When he is given some decent line mates - he will produce.
I have a good feeling that when he gets on the board - it will be a big goal. Every goal he scores - and there will be more than 1 - will be timely and huge.

Just my feeling
 

BruinsNetwork

Guest
After watching each game Coyle and Donato have played with their new teams, I’d personally make that trade again and again.

Coyle actually gives the Bruins a solid, unspectacular, steady middle-six center to work with for the first time all year. The points aren’t there, but the possession and solidified presence is. Interested to see what he looks like when he gets one of Heinen or Johansson when everyone is healthy.

For the record, I don’t love Coyle and never have, but I do think he’s a solid, talented middle-six player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Make-Believe

remer

Registered User
Oct 18, 2005
5,850
1,820
Coyle had decent linemates in Minnesota. Played the wing more, but was still struggling..
Feb. 20th article on rotowire: "Coyle Enduring Brutal Month" has just two points while averaging 17:41 of ice time in his past 10 games.
Hope he starts figuring it out soon. Not too many options in the Bruin line-up to help his production.
Rooting for him to be an important piece for this team moving forward.
 

duffy

Registered User
Feb 12, 2006
1,764
1,324
I get the deal I would have done it as well.
Me also. Coyle protects the puck so well in both zones and almost always makes the right play.
I absolutely love this player and believe with more skilled line mates could put up some points.
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,369
45,633
At the Cross
youtu.be
Me also. Coyle protects the puck so well in both zones and almost always makes the right play.
I absolutely love this player and believe with more skilled line mates could put up some points.

Seems to be floating on the wing so far, doesn’t look comfortable. Tough spot to be on for him, hasn’t really had any continuity yet
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad