He's been trying to for a few years now...You know it's just a matter of time until Savard is back in Boston in some capacity.
Bruins brass don't want him for some reason.
It's a travesty he's in Calgary right now.
He's been trying to for a few years now...You know it's just a matter of time until Savard is back in Boston in some capacity.
TV38 had great management in the 70s and invested heavily in equipment to cover home games. When they started televising games in 1967-68 the Garden could only handle 3 cameras, a 4th was added behind a goal around 1972.It’d be great if NESN got on board with a retro themed broadcast for the anniversary.
You are correct on McQuaid - he also pounded Torres & Tom Wilson along the wayI would swap out Wensink and Donato for Oliver & Williams for sure. Probably trade out Doak for Quaider also. If memory serves me he pinched in and kept the play alive in OT G7 against Montreal, allowing Lucic to pass to Horton. He also scored the only goal in the elimination G4 against Pittsburgh in '13.
It really doesn’t mean much at the end of the day.The committee respected the early years of the franchise.
From the “Historic 100,” the independent selection committee, appointed by the club in June, will determine the final 20 players (12 forwards, 6 defensemen, 2 goaltenders) that will comprise the All-Centennial Team.
That is going to be a brutal cut.
The goalies will be Cheevers and Thomas - 3 CupsIt really doesn’t mean much at the end of the day.
It’s fun to discuss and debate, it I’m not sure why they’d even want to narrow it down to a top 20.
There will be some no brainers like Esposito, Bergeron, Orr, and Bourque.
The “4th line” and “bottom D pairing” will be hotly debated.
The 2 goalies will be controversial, no matter who they go with.
Yes, Shore is a shoe in for sure.The goalies will be Cheevers and Thomas - 3 Cups
Defense - Shore, Orr, Bourque and Charra.
Forwards -
The Bruins don’t have a single goaltender’s number retired.Yes, Shore is a shoe in for sure.
Came back to add him.
Chara should be there too. Agreed.
The goalie thing is so difficult to compare across eras, especially when you consider the numbers in the rafters and the ones not up there.
The Bruins don’t have a single goaltender’s number retired.
Frank Brimsek; Tiny Thompson; Gerry Cheevers; and Tim Thomas all won the Cup here. Brimsek and Cheevers did it twice. None of them in the rafters.
Then you have other standouts like Rask and Gilbert.
No love for the ‘tendies in Beantown.
Absolutely. Very strange indeed.Which is weird for a club that's put a lot of stock in its defense for a long time.
What he wanted was $9 mil a year.
Great comparison, original 06 point totals compared to points in the highest scoring era in NHL history.
That's a fair point, but you know that D men back in Jacques era played for the most part a 4 man rotation, with the 5D not getting much ice time. So he had more ice time than D men in Langway's era.
I would say that Langway's last two year in Montreal, was superior to all of JL years outside of his Norris season. Yeah,there is no debating JL had more years in Montreal
than Langway but Langway had multiple 2-3 high end years in Montreal and I have no issue putting him in the top 6.
This sure as hell isn't like putting Leech or Coffey in a Boston Bruins top 6.
I'm going to leave it there and we'll agree to disagree.
The goalies will be Cheevers and Thomas - 3 Cups
Defense - Shore, Orr, Bourque and Charra.
Forwards -
I'd have Brimsek before Cheevers.
Isn't Brad Park a sure thing?
Not a fan vote.Orr, Shore, Bourque, Chara, Park should be a lock.
I don't see Hitchman or Quackenbush having a case over him. If anything they're in the dog fight for #6 with Clapper.
But then again it's a fan vote so who knows how it shakes out
No thanks to the entire exercise.It really doesn’t mean much at the end of the day.
It’s fun to discuss and debate, it I’m not sure why they’d even want to narrow it down to a top 20.
There will be some no brainers like Esposito, Bergeron, Orr, and Bourque.
The “4th line” and “bottom D pairing” will be hotly debated.
The 2 goalies will be controversial, no matter who they go with.
The Bruins don’t have a single goaltender’s number retired.
Frank Brimsek; Tiny Thompson; Gerry Cheevers; and Tim Thomas all won the Cup here. Brimsek and Cheevers did it twice. None of them in the rafters.
Then you have other standouts like Rask and Gilbert.
No love for the ‘tendies in Beantown.
Got to see Hodge play for the New Haven Nighthawks back then. He was born in England so not a real Canadian, much like Stan Mikita.One thing I was stunned putting my team together was Ken Hodge after a 50, 45, 43 goal seasons- two 105 point top 4 point leaders and 2-3 first team all stars played TWO years in AHL
@Fenway you remember this?89 AHL games after over 300 NHL goals and probably half dozen all star gamesEspo was still on Rangers where Hodge ended up but apparently was cookedFolks reading - if you time traveled back to 1970’s and could watch Bruins games two things would blow you away
Cigarette smoke
Hecklers
There was no music other then organ every now and then and you could hear people cough 3 sections over
@Gee Wally & @Dennis Bonvie amirite on this
And the ‘Mary Hodge & Peggy McNab’ barbs were amazing
Please tell me @Fenian24 was there to witness this
Pure gold
Ok my folks seats were in loge 7 above corner clock - to our left I think was loge 6 and the guy would yell out when quiet ‘come on snow shoes’Got to see Hodge play for the New Haven Nighthawks back then. He was born in England so not a real Canadian, much like Stan Mikita.
Go back to the 60's it would have been cigar smoke.
Loved the hecklers. Went to a game where a guy in our section rode Milbury for the whole game. Great entertainment.
More like Jacobs making bank day and fans wallet depletion dayUniform unveiling today, eh?
Gonna have to be a baller sweater for me to get one. My expectations are low, and I despise Adidas.Uniform unveiling today, eh?
Where is thisMore like Jacobs making bank day and fans wallet depletion day