CHALUPA
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2008
- 1,080
- 311
Did the main board thread get deleted lol
I think it got renamed. “Fun must be always” now.
EDIT: I have no idea what’s happening ignore me
Did the main board thread get deleted lol
I believe it was renamedDid the main board thread get deleted lol
I see it's not epic anymoreI believe it was renamed
The most shocking stat on that card is the 31GP for sureSometimes, even though you are in a healthy relationship, it's okay to go see what your ex is up to:
View attachment 947423 View attachment 947425
Bedard gives off Matthews energy. I don’t see the drive in him to become one of the greatest.Agreed i think with an exception to a few outliers everyone was cautiously optimistic. Then after he began to dazzle game after game is when the hype train left the station.
This is the first time probably since Crosby/ Ovie where I’m actively doing everything I can to see a player play. I can’t say I feel the same way about Bedard like I was curious to see what the hype was about but I was never really like wow I have to see him play again
Easy, just trade Celebrini to Pens for Crosby and other scrubs. Win now! @sampler and their bets agree.I don't see how it can ever happen but I'd dearly love to see Celebrini with Karlsson while he's still any good. They would absolutely Globetrotter teams.
Getout.gifEasy, just trade Celebrini to Pens for Crosby and other scrubs. Win now! @sampler and their bets agree.
Easy, just trade Celebrini to Pens for Crosby and other scrubs. Win now! @sampler and their bets agree.
Probably the best gif of Granlund there is
F*** themEasy, just trade Celebrini to Pens for Crosby and other scrubs. Win now! @sampler and their bets agree.
Michkov 5 game pointless streak. Notice how a particular 3-4 posters are nowhere to be found. lol
Attach files > *Choose gif-file of preference* > Insert... > Full image
100% agreed. He's worth the watch alone.
While all signs point in an amazing direction, my long term concern with Celebrini is how much headroom he has for further improvement.
So there's massive upside, but the flat/downside case for Mack - meaning, we would get a great 6-10 years but maybe like Tavares his game stabilizes and then peters out - would be:
- Physical development. He's definitely not fully matured as a human. I think we can expect him to develop some strength, and hopefully some even more explosiveness (ala Nate MacK) through approx 23-ish. However, his physical development won't be as obvious as, say, Will Smith's, so it's not like his upside is massive here.
- Skills. Hopefully he gets even better at, e.g., a variety of shot releases, puck control, faceoffs, shootouts/breakaways. For something like faceoffs, he could go from ~50% to 55% and be an NHL leader if he puts in the effort, probably. He's not likely to become as good a goal scorer as Matthews but he can certainly improve his shot accuracy, selection, and finish on breakways/SO's.
- Skating. He's already a very solid skater and has lots of quick-burst explosiveness, but there are definitely areas he could improve his edgework to go from excellent to NHL/world-elite. However, I'm not sure this will be a huge jump.
- Hockey sense, decision making, and all around responsible play: he's starting at a pretty high base here. There will be improvement, but it might be less than other rookies/18yo's. If he can push this into the stratosphere then we will see him become truly Crosby-lite or better, and his ppg will become 1.3-1.5ppg like the very best in the league.
- Effort/compete. There's not much more he can put in here. He doesn't take games off. What that means is "wysiwyg", we're not likely to see Macklin turn on another otherworldly gear in the playoffs, for example.
There's every reason to believe the upside scenario that he becomes a more defensively minded, perhaps slightly less dangerous/explosive MacKinnon, which is a cornerstone piece that could definitely lead us to a cup. There's also a little worry that he's starting close to max and so there's not a massive jump to come from here. His young age tips me toward optimism but I wanted to lay out the concern case.
- Only a bit more physical development
- Skills get better but he doesn't reach the MacKinnon-level
- Skating gets a little better but he's mostly close to finished form
- Hockey sense, decision making, responsible play gets better and puts him in Selke territory but he doesn't break through to Datsyuk/Zetterberg/Barkov/Bergeron levels
- Effort/compete is already maxed so you see his ability to keep up slowly erode as his maxed body and maxed effort leads to nagging injuries.
yup a top line player in last year's NHL started at 60 points and that was exactly what our best player scored. this year we have 3 players at that pace or higher (forwards, jake walman is having a huge season) but celebrini doesn't play with the other 2 usually.The biggest thing is getting more dynamic teammates. He's been centering Kovalenko (Middle 9 winger) and Toffoli (towards the bottom of 2Wers). He'll still improve. I could see him a as 100-120 pt two way center at his peak, but that will depend on how good his linemates are.
No chance, he would literally need to play every game left on the season to even have a chance.Would it be something that everyone think it is a race between Michkov and Celeberini and Hudson and Askarov out of no where win the Calder? The Sharks got to be careful not to play Askarov too much from here on or he steals the Calder from Celebrini.