Line Combos: CBJ Roster Discussion/Line Combos/Injury Report

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
my counterpoint to this is that i have simply not read those comments and like a tiny baby playing peek-a-boo for the first time, they may as well not exist to me

i do wonder if the idea of getting him retained down to 50% + getting out of compher's deal in the same trade would change their feelings.
Not meaning to accuse; just trying to appraise y'all of the situation. I know not everybody here has the (lack of) sanity necessary to regularly browse TR&FA.
 


hey don.. yes plz

A guy making just shy of $8m/year for the next six years who has literally never managed to complete a full season of play in the NHL due to frequent recurring shoulder injuries. Ryan Murray was more consistently available than he's been.

I would not consider that a worthwhile risk.


EDIT: Side-by-side comparison of Murray's and Norris' games played, by age:
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Age[/TD]
[TD]Murray GP[/TD]
[TD]Norris GP[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]66[/TD]
[TD]0 (17/36 NCAA)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]3 (56/60 AHL)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]82[/TD]
[TD]56[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]60[/TD]
[TD]66[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]44[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]56[/TD]
[TD]50[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Started at 19 because neither of them were playing NHL games before that age. Cut off at 25 because this is Norris' age 25 season, which is obviously not done yet; Murray had only 27 games that season and after it was no longer a Blue Jacket.
 
Last edited:
A guy making just shy of $8m/year for the next six years who has literally never managed to complete a full season of play in the NHL due to frequent recurring shoulder injuries. Ryan Murray was more consistently available than he's been.

He has a trophy named after him, he can't be that bad???

...low-hanging fruit and all that
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ThirdPeriodTurtle


Obviously we’d need to add but my goodness if Brady Tkachuk is available I’d make anyone not named KJ, Werenski, or Fantilli available.

The problem is I believe Fantilli would be the exact player they’d target.
 


Obviously we’d need to add but my goodness if Brady Tkachuk is available I’d make anyone not named KJ, Werenski, or Fantilli available.

The problem is I believe Fantilli would be the exact player they’d




Obviously we’d need to add but my goodness if Brady Tkachuk is available I’d make anyone not named KJ, Werenski, or Fantilli available.

The problem is I believe Fantilli would be the exact player they’d target.

I don't think it's going to happen but hey, Jiricek and a top 3 protected 1st in 2025?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBJx614


Obviously we’d need to add but my goodness if Brady Tkachuk is available I’d make anyone not named KJ, Werenski, or Fantilli available.

The problem is I believe Fantilli would be the exact player they’d target.

Seems like a great opportunity for a Jiricek deal. :sarcasm:
 


Obviously we’d need to add but my goodness if Brady Tkachuk is available I’d make anyone not named KJ, Werenski, or Fantilli available.

The problem is I believe Fantilli would be the exact player they’d target.

Same. Jiricek+ 1st + ???
 
Same. Jiricek+ 1st + ???
Doubt they'd want a total future package in bizzaro world where things got that far. Would maybe be something around Jiricek+Marchenko

That said I think they consider moving Norris as their core shakeup
 


Obviously we’d need to add but my goodness if Brady Tkachuk is available I’d make anyone not named KJ, Werenski, or Fantilli available.

The problem is I believe Fantilli would be the exact player they’d target.

You gotta give to get.
 
tell that to all the people on the main board who are pitching their shitty jiricek proposals around a b prospect, fringe player and 2nd round pick
That's survivorship bias in action; the people who legit recognize You Have To Give To Get by and large aren't the ones dumb enough and Dunning-Krugered enough to be posting those proposals.
 
Since I hope that Jiricek sticks around and plays the rest of the season with Mateychuk in Cleveland building chemistry with him, if Columbus keep Fabbro (fingers crossed) and Christiansen, I'd like to see them try Mateychuk and Jiricek on a pair together in the NHL next season with Gudbranson (or Harris) as the 7D like so:

Werenski-Fabbro
Christiansen-Severson
Mateychuk-Jiricek
Gudbranson
 
Last edited:
Since I hope that Jiricek sticks around and plays the rest of the season with Mateychuk in Cleveland building chemistry with him, if Columbus keep Fabbro (fingers crossed) and Christiansen, I'd like to see them try Mateychuk and Jiricek on a pair together in the NHL next season with Gudbranson (or Harris) as the 7D like so:

Werenski-Fabbro
Christiansen-Severson
Mateychuk-Jiricek
Gudbranson
It's tough to break in multiple kids at once in general, nevermind on the same pair but atleast in this scenario they could be protected until they show its not needed
 
It's tough to break in multiple kids at once in general, nevermind on the same pair but atleast in this scenario they could be protected until they show its not needed
Yeah, it's unconventional but my thought process is also if they played the same system in Cleveland and showed chemistry, they'll have a foundation to stand on and then you maybe can put some veteran forwards like ZAR and Olivier with them to insulate them. I just think those three D pairs will be really good.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Please disable your adblocker on HFBoards.com

It looks like your adblocker is attempting to interfere with the intended operation of this site. Support us by allowing our site to function as we intended. Please disable your adblocker and add us to your allowlist.

Frequently Asked Questions
I'm not using a blocker. Why am I seeing this message?
You're likely seeing this message because an app or extension on your computer is blocking ads. The app or extension may be a "privacy" or "malware" blocker, or a VPN.

I disabled my blocker. Why am I still seeing this message?
It's common to have two or more adblocking extensions running at the same time. See the question above.