Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Fits the timeline; dunno if he fits the room. I'd hesitate.
* * *
We've got a lot of centers to develop as is, but I think he plays "the right way" well enough that he'd nonetheless be potentially useful.
Speculation: CBJ have cap space and willing to add a forward from a cap strapped team.
- Thread starter CBJWerenski8
- Start date
-
HF Sportsbook has been reset for the new season - Click here to play.
- Status
CBJWerenski8
Rest in Peace Johnny
- Jun 13, 2009
- 43,565
- 26,590
I don’t think Kane fits because he’s going to potentially miss most of the year. We’d like someone now.
KrisLetAngry
MrJukeBoy
Maybe Dubas never inquired but if they wanted picks
The Rakkell + 2nd for Laine offer I proposed would have allowed them to have 2 2nds instead of 0.
O how the tables have turned.
The Rakkell + 2nd for Laine offer I proposed would have allowed them to have 2 2nds instead of 0.
O how the tables have turned.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Crede777
Deputized
- Dec 16, 2009
- 14,836
- 4,549
I think it's that ownership doesn't want to spend money on a player who isn't playing in Columbus. They'll spend on a cap dump as long as he's here and dressing for games. They won't retain on a player that isn't here.
Khelandros
Registered User
- Feb 12, 2019
- 4,305
- 4,700
KrisLetAngry
MrJukeBoy
I wouldn't pay a 2nd to get rid of Rakell. It was only for the upgrade of Laine.
I get it 4 years left 20 million v 2 years at 17 mill.
Just makes me wonder which would have been better for Columbus
deca guard
Registered User
berggren plus holl for a prospect . holl a pure cap (2x3.4) dump giving detroit more space to sign mo n ray which is needed because seider gonna get 10 and raymond 9 . berggren possibly a long term 20+ goal scorer thats not fitting detroits two way style , plus detroit has forwards in mazur n kasper that could make the jump replacing berggren . which prospect ive no idea . im a fan of berggren , has confidence/hunger/solid offensive talent . i dont want to trade him , but its said detroit might want to so im speculating
To Columbus - Ehlers
To Winnipeg - Gudbranson, Pinelli, 4th Rd
To Winnipeg - Gudbranson, Pinelli, 4th Rd
Yes, I used the same source. Now do a little research on each team and start by taking out LTIR players from Washington, Vegas, Montreal, and Philly.
Are there teams close to the cap? Yes. Are they at risk of not being cap compliant? No. Do those teams need/want to expend assets for some relief NOW? Pretty unlikely IMO.
Feels like the only moves that would precipitate a cap-dump would be a team (NY Islanders/Rangers for example) trying to acquire either Nikolaj Ehlers or Trevor Zegras in a trade and they can't get the returning cap to work out.
There really doesn't seem to be much else available in the market right now or any teams that are in desperation cap-mode that would need to offload any contracts.
If/when both Landeskog and Nichushkin are back for the Avs they will be squeezed by $3 - 3.5 million (depends upon the pro-rated hit when that occurs); but they have until mid-December at the earliest for that impact and if they can get a clear resolution on each of them it would serve them better than making any decisions too early as it is just as likely that one of them can't/won't return as it is they do.
There really doesn't seem to be much else available in the market right now or any teams that are in desperation cap-mode that would need to offload any contracts.
If/when both Landeskog and Nichushkin are back for the Avs they will be squeezed by $3 - 3.5 million (depends upon the pro-rated hit when that occurs); but they have until mid-December at the earliest for that impact and if they can get a clear resolution on each of them it would serve them better than making any decisions too early as it is just as likely that one of them can't/won't return as it is they do.
I think it will closer to the end of camp and preseason where they’ll do a small trade for a warm body. Nothing to crazy cap hit wise.
Only if a 50% retained Boone Jenner was coming back as we would have no 3C options. Avs will hold on until early/mid December to see how things shake out with Landeskog/Nichushkin before making any major moves. They want to accrue as much cap space as they can for as long as they can. The only move they might make is a PTO as they are short on forwards until Gabe/Val return but Foudy and MacDonald will serve until then and maybe even Cal Ritchie gets a 9 game audition during that time to help bridge the gap.
Avs don't care so much about what happens in October/November; they just want to be ready to roll once the calendar turns to February/March.
MTL Dirty Birdy
Registered User
- Aug 29, 2021
- 1,353
- 1,537
Kk from the canes makes sense. That way Carolina can sign Jarvis. Probably a third as a sweetener.
One Winged Angel
You Can't Escape
The Rangers will give you Trouba for free. He would make a fun power forward that goes around hitting everything.
Don’t worry, we’ll force him to waive that pesky NTC.
Don’t worry, we’ll force him to waive that pesky NTC.
Tawnos
A guy with a bass
miscs75
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2014
- 6,467
- 6,054
Honestly would be worth it moving him out if he’s interested in going. He’s offensively a black hole but wins faceoffs and plays solid defense. He also seems to fix ailments of players who are slumping somehow. Ideally moving him for a pick and/or low end roster player (one of the NHL/AHL tweeners who would be a 18th NHL forward/11th defenseman) would be the ideal return just to move out the cap. It’s a 2 year deal.
Trouba would hear the cannon and immediately elbow the closest person in the head due to the hypnotism he went through this summer from the stress of possibly being traded away from NYC.
Well that has to be the priority for Columbus: develop the young players and give them top 9 usage. Otherwise you are wasting Johnson, Sillinger, Voronkov, Marchenko, and Chinakhov. Unless one of them just is not fitting into the teams design any new additions pushes them into 4th line/AHL or press-box duty which doesn't help them or the team.
They aren't a playoff contender so why bother with a short-sided "upgrade" in their forward group just to acquire a 2nd round pick when it comes at the expense of your good prospects on the team right now?
It's been almost 25 years, but the Blue Jackets are still just happy to be there.
- Status
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Useless Thread MCMVIII: Mario FIXED It - The U Appreciation Thread- Latest: PanthersPens62
