Claimed off Waivers: [CBJ] Blue Jackets claim D Dante Fabbro off waivers from the Predators

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,691
35,316
40N 83W (approx)
For those interested, this cost Columbus $15,000, paid to Nashville and not counted against the cap.



Total number of claims: 11
Total compensation: $402,750
Eleven? That's surprising, because going by my reading of the CBA and the standings, literally half the league was in front of Columbus as of the time the claim order was placed. So either I'm interpreting something wrong, or there were a lot of playoff contender teams interested. (Probably the former.)
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,316
20,276
If Columbus re-waives him at some point this season, I could see Nashville letting him go to avoid the second year.

Eleven? That's surprising, because going by my reading of the CBA and the standings, literally half the league was in front of Columbus as of the time the claim order was placed. So either I'm interpreting something wrong, or there were a lot of playoff contender teams interested. (Probably the former.)
That's the number of claims made league wide this year. Nobody knows if any team after Columbus also put in a claim (other than the league office).
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,691
35,316
40N 83W (approx)
If Columbus re-waives him at some point this season, I could see Nashville letting him go to avoid the second year.


That's the number of claims made league wide this year. Nobody knows if any team after Columbus also put in a claim (other than the league office).
...oh. Well, gosh, now I'm feeling all embarrassed. :D
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,868
9,927
Acton, Ontario
Eleven? That's surprising, because going by my reading of the CBA and the standings, literally half the league was in front of Columbus as of the time the claim order was placed. So either I'm interpreting something wrong, or there were a lot of playoff contender teams interested. (Probably the former.)
Sorry, that's the number of total successful claims in the season; Fabbro is the 11th player to claimed this season
Maybe I need a better way to phrase it...
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,691
35,316
40N 83W (approx)
Okay, I'm going full OCD mode. "at the time of the request for Waivers" means no yesterday games, so we get to figure that half the League or so passed on him.

Exact order, by points percentage unless noted otherwise:
San Jose
Montreal
Chicago
Anaheim
Philadelphia
Colorado
Seattle
Pittsburgh
Ottawa
Buffalo (over Edmonton by goal-differential tiebreaker)
Edmonton
NYI (over the other four due to two shootout wins being excluded by tiebreaker; they also lost head-to-heads to everyone except Boston)
Boston
St. Louis
Detroit
Columbus
And of those, the teams that could have claimed him with minimal cap concerns would be San Jose, Anaheim, Buffalo, and Columbus. It'd be a tight fit for Chicago, but they could have done it. Depending on what manner of fakery you choose to ignore the nuance of cap space accrual, Detroit has either barely enough or barely not enough. Montreal, Colorado, and NYI are all making heavy use of LTIR, so those complicated logistics may have gotten in the way. Everyone else appears to lack the available space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coooldude

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,691
35,316
40N 83W (approx)
Gallagher and Anderson? Maybe throw in Armia or Dvorak. :sarcasm:
trouble.gif
 

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,292
24,526
Defeatist . Jiricek is f***en and off the AHL

Optimist... My oil now trade for provorov and jiricek stays in NHL. Win win

My guess is the latter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fro

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,774
32,925
Werenski, Provorov, Severson and Fabbro isn’t too shabby as a Top 4. Also JMFJ the legend in the ranks, of course

Crazy that he got past SJ. Werenski-Severson/Provorov-Fabbro is a pretty well balanced top 4.

Werenski - Provorov and Christiansen - Severson have both been getting good results, it's the strength of the team at this point. I think Fabbro might not fit into the top 4 until after Provorov is traded.

Defeatist . Jiricek is f***en and off the AHL

Optimist... My oil now trade for provorov and jiricek stays in NHL. Win win

My guess is the latter

If Jiricek keeps improving then he's not f***ed, and the AHL might be the best place for that.

My guess is Jiricek or Harris get sent down now and then later on in the year Provorov will be dealt and there'll be more room for Jiricek, who will hopefully have settled his game down by that point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,228
12,378
Crazy that he got past SJ. Werenski-Severson/Provorov-Fabbro is a pretty well balanced top 4.

Surprised Buffalo wouldn't throw a mid pick Nashville's way given that he'd be a perfect partner for Owen Power. Or Utah when they lost both Marino and Durzi and are absolutely dying for a Fabbro type defenseman. Hell I would take him on the Caps and we don't even need him. Maybe Trotz waived him quietly hoping to sneak him through like Poile tried with Tolvanen? Either way, another mark in the extremely sus Barry Trotz as GM decision column

Where would Barry even be trying to "sneak Fabbro through" to? He's like nearly thirty. He's not a, "send him down to the minors to develop" sorta guy.


Idk. I'm also kind of shocked he wasn't scooped up earlier in the waiver priority too. There's gotta be something else going on with him, right? Otherwise it's like..."wooo...free #4/5RHD". Which teams routinely pay a premium for at the deadline. Even though Fabbro isn't the most desired "type" of that player, he's still an entirely competent NHLer and it's not like he's got some hugely onerous contract that would deter teams. $2.5M might be a little bit too much for what he's done lately, but it's also not that big and expiring after this year, so you're on the hook for practically nothing if you're a bad team.



I do kind of wonder if San Jose being out of "retention slots" played a part in that aspect. They clearly aren't contenders this year...and without retention, Fabbro might be tough to move at the deadline. But it's still like..."free asset". Because he can actually play. Unless there's something off the ice that some of these teams just don't want around their young, developing players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porter Stoutheart

3074326

Registered User
Apr 9, 2009
11,742
11,356
USA
Low risk, RD doesn't hurt, allows them to move Provorov

Just a big common sense move here. Looking forward to how he plays with Werenski, I think we will see Fabbro turn it around.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad