Prospect Info: Cayden Lindstrom

Nanabijou

Booooooooooone
Dec 22, 2009
2,994
664
Columbus, Ohio
Too put some at ease, Lemieux has the same procedure done in 1990 when he was 24/25. He made it another 7 years before his 1st retirement and then played another 6 years when he came out of retirement. Peyton Manning also had the procedure done, it was a more severe case but he played in the NFL another 4 season after, 3 of which were at a high level. So it isn't doom and gloom especially for how young he is.
Good context, thanks. This still feels like an overly risky draft pick when there were options like Demidov available.
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,734
26,799
I know this off-topic but would be nice if AP would "try this again" and post it to his Bluesky account where he already has 1K followers despite not posting a single post.
My guess is he won’t do it. He had a “threads” account and never updated that either
 

MoeBartoli

Checkers-to-Jackets
Sponsor
Jan 12, 2011
14,461
10,892
Good context, thanks. This still feels like an overly risky draft pick when there were options like Demidov available.
I’m sticking with my original opinion of Lindstrom’s drafting. There’s a lot of physical injuries that can be fully healed. Some just take longer than others. But I don’t put back injuries in that category as they are rarely fully healed and generally remain a question mark as to future recurrence.

He may be a great prospect and may become a great player, but IMO he carried a risk the CBJ shouldn’t have taken. Was he that significantly better than everyone else remaining?
 
Last edited:

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,822
13,392
Canada
I’m sticking with y original opinion of Lindstrom’s drafting. There’s a lot of physical injuries that can be fully healed. Some just take longer than others. But I don’t put back injuries in that category as they are rarely fully healed and generally remain a question mark as to future recurrence.

He may be a great prospect and may become a great player, but IMO he carried a risk the CBJ shouldn’t have taken. Was he that significantly better than everyone else remaining?
Depends on your definition of significantly better. Skill wise? Obviously not. In potential impact in the playoffs when games get tight and physical? Absolutely
 

MoeBartoli

Checkers-to-Jackets
Sponsor
Jan 12, 2011
14,461
10,892
Depends on your definition of significantly better. Skill wise? Obviously not. In potential impact in the playoffs when games get tight and physical? Absolutely
Yep…..same for this guy.

IMG_1427.jpeg
 

Fred Glover

Chief of Sinners
Sponsor
Nov 17, 2007
6,465
2,056
Ohio
The main thing is this young man’s health and recovery
I wish him well
I could give a rip about what posters here have to say about whether or not the CBJ should have picked him at 4 or when and or if he will play this year or not
His health is the primary concern and that seems to be the mindset of the Jackets
Get well soon young man!
 

MAHJ71

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 6, 2014
11,795
4,132
NWA 217
Wanted Demidov with that pick from the beginning.. this news just makes it look even worse. Par for the course for CBJ I guess.

With where CBJ was at as an org at the time, it was an unnecessary risk, especially with others like Demidov still available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jovavic

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,329
8,339
C-137
I'm no doctor but is there such thing as a "minor" back procedure?
As someone else pointed out, Vasilevsky had the same procedure last year at like 30yrs old and has recovered and is seemingly playing fine.

Different people react different obviously, but if a 29-30 year old can recover and play 2 months later, a 18 yr old kid in theory should be able to recover just fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LJ7 and EspenK

Cyclones Rock

Registered User
Jun 12, 2008
10,915
7,078
I’m sticking with my original opinion of Lindstrom’s drafting. There’s a lot of physical injuries that can be fully healed. Some just take longer than others. But I don’t put back injuries in that category as they are rarely fully healed and generally remain a question mark as to future recurrence.

He may be a great prospect and may become a great player, but IMO he carried a risk the CBJ shouldn’t have taken. Was he that significantly better than everyone else remaining?
It really surprised me when I found out that the CBJ were aware of his physical problems prior to drafting him. Your argument that "was he significantly better...." resonates with me.

Hopefully the kid will fully heal and become an impact player on the CBJ and his health prior to the draft will become a moot point. If he doesn't, whiffing on a 4th overall will be a stain on Waddell and Company's resume.

I'm no doctor but is there such thing as a "minor" back procedure?
Yes. Those that don't generate significant fees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoeBartoli

Aaaarrgghh

Registered User
Jul 17, 2022
642
682
It's worth remembering that if Lindstrom didn't have these issues, he probably wouldn't have even been available for Columbus to draft. Also, the rumours at the draft were that lot of teams were interested in trading for him at #4. I assume their medical staffs also looked at it.

This is disappointing news, but it sounds minor and I hope that he crushes it when he's back in Medicine Hat and that we can be excited about this pick going forward.
 
Last edited:

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,572
5,487
It comes down to who would have been a better pick at 4OA, knowing Lindstrom’s injury problem. Iginla? Probably not. Demidov? Probably yes. The Jackets aren’t exactly overflowing with dynamic, play-driving, forwards.

OK but the Jackets did know, in as great detail as possible, Lindstrom's injury problem. And they knew, presumably in great detail as well, the characteristics of the other available players. And they chose Lindstrom.

So it's pretty funny that the HFNerds are roaming around prematurely "told ya so-ing" without the same luxury of information the Jackets have.

It's like me going to the Habs board saying "Demidov is still in Russia, he only has 6 goals, he'll probably never come over, terrible pick."
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBJx614 and Viqsi

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,822
13,392
Canada
It comes down to who would have been a better pick at 4OA, knowing Lindstrom’s injury problem. Iginla? Probably not. Demidov? Probably yes. The Jackets aren’t exactly overflowing with dynamic, play-driving, forwards.
Irrelevant to my post, as it happened its pretty believable. As someone who has gone through it in my 30's without the support he has or surgery to assist it I'm also less concerned
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monk

The Last Red

Registered User
Jan 2, 2022
1,536
1,730
OK but the Jackets did know, in as great detail as possible, Lindstrom's injury problem. And they knew, presumably in great detail as well, the characteristics of the other available players. And they chose Lindstrom.

So it's pretty funny that the HFNerds are roaming around prematurely "told ya so-ing" without the same luxury of information the Jackets have.

It's like me going to the Habs board saying "Demidov is still in Russia, he only has 6 goals, he'll probably never come over, terrible pick."
It's not "told ya so-ing." It's not the pick I would have made, because of his back issues, given the other options available, He may turn out to be the best player of the group that CBJ could have drafted, that still wouldn't change my analysis. He was a very risky pick where he was taken. Risk-taking is more palatable when there are not any other good options, which was not the case here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAHJ71

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,572
5,487
It's not "told ya so-ing." It's not the pick I would have made, because of his back issues, given the other options available, He may turn out to be the best player of the group that CBJ could have drafted, that still wouldn't change my analysis. He was a very risky pick where he was taken. Risk-taking is more palatable when there are not any other good options, which was not the case here.

Funny timing then I guess. You're just here telling us what you would have done because...?

If "it comes down to who would have been a better pick at 4OA" then let's revisit in a coupla years. Like with pretty much all draft picks. And then you can can tell us if you were right.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad