If he could pk well and win some draws he'd be a core guy. We really didn't have any good pk forwards last season. Maybe they address that with personnel and coaching.
E: got me digging a bit. CM looked to be not a great PKer. Maybe I'm reading these wrong but according to SHGA/60 Stillman had the lowest on the team with 7.1 which works out to be about 76% kill rate if we assume 30 PPs per 60 minutes. Not great for your leader and unfortunately he only played 28 seconds a game on the kill with a smaller sample size.
CM - 12.9 SHGA/60 = 57% kill rate
Krebs - 8.2 SHGA/60 = 73% kill rate
Krebbers was the top forward
Mitts has never really been used as a PKer. He‘s only played 21 and 28mins respectively on the PK the last two years. So we really don’t know how good or bad he would be if given a bigger role.
Those PK stats can’t tell us much for a few reasons, the biggest one being sample size. The goals scored stat is too heavily skewed by a few goals in such small sample sizes. But also you’re focusing on goals scored as opposed to xGA/60 which would tell the story of chance’s surrendered when someone is out there. Honestly, neither is that great in such small samples.
Mitts’ xGA/60 was pretty good the last two seasons (best this past season among forwards). He’s actual goals against/60 was good in 21-22 and not so good this past year.
21-22 —>
xGA/60 - 6.73
GA/60 - 8.65 (3 goals allowed in 21mins)
22-23
xGA/60 -7.00
GA/60 -12.86 (6 goals against in 28mins)
I don’t take anything out the positive or negative here. It’s too small of a sample. But it does show how much things swing with a few goals. It’s also hard to use a GA/60mins stat for sample sizes that are 1/2 or 1/3 of 60mins respectively. A number that can get skewed quite a lot in either direction (good or bad) in a short period of time.
What are you basing us having no good PKing forwards on? Just that the PK was bad? There are a lot of explanations for that that don’t require all the forwards to be bad at PKing. It was a bad PK systemically, goalies struggled, etc.