GDT: Carolina Panthers 5: Young and the Restless Fans

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Bunch of Jurcos

The poster formally known as Hedley
Feb 24, 2016
3,712
15,636
That Cincy touchdown was the first truly poor play in two weeks. Carolina is not good enough to tackle like that and get away with it.
 

AhosDatsyukian

Registered User
Sep 25, 2020
11,225
32,700
Glad to see Legette with a bit of a breakout game. We should be up 2 TDs if not for Diontae drops and terrible tackling. Either way good first half all things considered. Bengals are absolutely desperate and not quite as bad as their 0-3 record. Still not expecting a ton from the team this year but Canales looking more legit after the first 2 disastrous weeks. Dalton coming in obviously a big reason but I also think Canales is getting settled in a bit. He looked way over his head weeks 1 and 2 aside from Bryce sucking.
 

Unsustainable

Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
Apr 14, 2012
38,964
108,320
North Carolina
What happened with Young? Is it that he can't do those things at the NHL level that scouts thought he could do? Is it that he can't process the game when it's so much faster and bigger? Or does he still have this in him, but needs a fresh start? Or did the Panthers just ruin him "short term"? Or is he just not big enough to handle the rigors?
CJ Stroud was the best available, but Tepper and others didn't like how he sounded when he talked. They took magic beans over someone who was athletically and played a better pro style
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,092
100,959
CJ Stroud was the best available, but Tepper and others didn't like how he sounded when he talked. They took magic beans over someone who was athletically and played a better pro style
Is that a "hindsight" statement? IIRC, most of the rankings had Young above Stroud as well, didn't they? The only concerns I recall about Young were his size. I believe many on this board also liked the pick (not necessarily the trade, but the pick).

Anyhow, was just curious as I don't watch that Panthers often.

I understand the QBs are hard to predict when drafting so often times, guys that get drafted early flop and guys that get drafted later become HOFers. I was just curious about the specifics of why he's struggling and if there is hope for him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw and DaveG

Tryamw

Loyal Fan of Jerks
Sponsor
Nov 2, 2016
40,277
78,345
Durham
The trade is akin to asking for a band aid to solve dismemberment. Young I was ambivalent to. Thought he might have it but Stoud was the higher bottom guy. Still not sure if we'd have broken Stroud
 
  • Like
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Unsustainable

Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
Apr 14, 2012
38,964
108,320
North Carolina
CJ Stroud was the best available, but Tepper and others didn't like how he sounded when he talked. They took magic beans over someone who was athletically and played a better pro style
Stroud, Young and Richardson was the top 3.

Stroud was the most ready, Young had the Alabama pedigree while being way under sized and Richardson had the most raw talent and athleticism.

Reports was that the way Stroud spoke is why Carolina took Young over him, despite Stroud having the better QB IQ and size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw and cptjeff

NotOpie

"Puck don't lie"
Jun 12, 2006
9,630
18,804
North Carolina
Stroud, Young and Richardson was the top 3.

Stroud was the most ready, Young had the Alabama pedigree while being way under sized and Richardson had the most raw talent and athleticism.

Reports was that the way Stroud spoke is why Carolina took Young over him, despite Stroud having the better QB IQ and size.
Wasn't it the "Wonderlic" like test that swung it against Stroud. I thought I read that Tepper and his wife put a ton of credence in that one factor and it swayed the decision. Not sure if it was the actual Wonderlic or one of the replacements/alternatives....
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,156
142,205
Bojangles Parking Lot
Despite the way it played out, I don’t think taking Young was that indefensible. There’s a lot of 20/20 hindsight about that decision, when at the draft it was all considered a toss up.

To me, the crazy thing is stripping down a whole-ass team, including trading the NFC OPOY and your #1 WR, in a tanking/trading bonanza during a year when everyone was saying “I dunno man, it’s a tossup” about the pick you burned down the franchise to get.

Like, the Pens tearing it all down for the Lemieux draft made sense… doing it for the Slafkovsky draft wouldn’t make sense. You need to know you’re getting the right guy and that the rebuild is gonna be so short your fans will forget it ever happened.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,092
100,959
Stroud, Young and Richardson was the top 3.

Stroud was the most ready, Young had the Alabama pedigree while being way under sized and Richardson had the most raw talent and athleticism.

Reports was that the way Stroud spoke is why Carolina took Young over him, despite Stroud having the better QB IQ and size.
I just googled and looked at many rankings, unrelated to the Panthers, and most of them had Young over Stroud. I assume many of those rankings were likely people that never did interviews with the two of them like Carolina did. I think saying Stroud was the better prospect at the draft is hindsight.

That's not to say that how Stroud spoke played a role in Carolina's decision (as I have no clue but read the rumors). Just saying that universally, it looks like many pundits had Young rated higher.

my concern with Young was size and durability. If you are right in picking him, you look like a genius but that's a risk for a guy his size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Star is Burns

Unsustainable

Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
Apr 14, 2012
38,964
108,320
North Carolina
I just googled and looked at many rankings, unrelated to the Panthers, and most of them had Young over Stroud. I assume many of those rankings were likely people that never did interviews with the two of them like Carolina did. I think saying Stroud was the better prospect at the draft is hindsight.

That's not to say that how Stroud spoke played a role in Carolina's decision (as I have no clue but read the rumors). Just saying that universally, it looks like many pundits had Young rated higher.

my concern with Young was size and durability. If you are right in picking him, you look like a genius but that's a risk for a guy his size.
Hes like a Doug Flutie with out the flakes and long bomb.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad