- Feb 15, 2005
- 5,293
- 4,087
Rangers strength of schedule up to now has been very soft - 6th easiest in NHL, and they are still struggling.
I think I'd move some things around at the bottom of the roster (mostly diverting some of the 13f, 14f, and 6d money into a vet backup rather than Stevenson) but sign me up. I also really like the idea of starting Leonard on that "4th" line, especially if they bring Dowd back.I still think they should go hard after Marner. Both to play with Ovi in his last year to make sure he gets 895 and to replace his production when he hangs ‘em up?
For instance, this would be cap compliant.
Ovechkin-Strome-Marner (8yrsx12,5M)
McMichael-Dubois-Wilson
Protas-Lapierre (2yrsx1,5M)-Miro
Duhaime-Dowd (1yrx1,3M)-Leonard (975k)
Trinyev (775k)-Rybinski (775k)
Chychrun (8yrsx7,5M)-Carlson
Sandin-Roy
Fehervary-($2,75M Dman)
Iorio
Thompson (4yrsx3,5M)
Stevenson
If you look at their game by game results it's even worse. They have one win against a team in a playoff spot.Rangers strength of schedule up to now has been very soft - 6th easiest in NHL, and they are still struggling.
I'm a fan of Marner, and wouldn't mind signing him. But:I posted this in the wrong thread so I’ll move it here..
I still think they should go hard after Marner. Both to play with Ovi in his last year to make sure he gets 895 and to replace his production when he hangs ‘em up?
Besides Backy and Oshie after this season Ovi and Carlson’s contract will also run out and re-signing the latter will be a tougher decision to make with him being 36 at the time it expires. So there could potentially be lots of cap space opening up in the next two years with the predicted cap raises ($92M at the minimum next year). Caps have $65,3M committed on 9F - 6D - 1G
Protas-Strome-Ovi
CMM-PLD-Wilson
Milano-X-Miro
Duhaime-X-X
X-X
X-Carlson
Sandin-Roy
Fehervary-TVR
Iorio
X-Stevenson
UFA’s:
Dowd, Raddysh, Bear, McIlrath, Eller, Vrana, Thompson, Lindgren
RFA:s, holding rights
Lapierre, Alexeyev, Leonard
So that’s $26,7M on 7 players with potentially 2 players north of $3M. If they sign Chychrun at 8x$7,5M and Thompson at 4x$3,5M they’ll still have $15M+ to sign a 3C, 4C, 4RW and 2 Extra F/D.
They’ll also have more wiggle-room if they move Milano ($1,9M) and maybe TVR ($3M), both will be on their last year of their contracts.
Players like Marner are very rarely available and neither Miro or Leonard will be close to offsetting Ovechkin’s production in the next few years.
For instance, this would be cap compliant.
Ovechkin-Strome-Marner (8yrsx12,5M)
McMichael-Dubois-Wilson
Protas-Lapierre (2yrsx1,5M)-Miro
Duhaime-Dowd (1yrx1,3M)-Leonard (975k)
Trinyev (775k)-Rybinski (775k)
Chychrun (8yrsx7,5M)-Carlson
Sandin-Roy
Fehervary-($2,75M Dman)
Iorio
Thompson (4yrsx3,5M)
Stevenson
And the year after (26-27) they’ll have the cap raise + Ovechkins cap hit + Carlson’s cap hit to either re-sign or replace Carlson and Fehervary. So the cap situation is actually IMO scary good right now.
I agree with 2) and don't really know anything about 3) but hard disagree on 1) here.I'm a fan of Marner, and wouldn't mind signing him. But:
1) it creates a serious log-jam at wing both short and long term. Leonard is one of the top prospects in hockey; they aren't keeping him on the 4th line for a whole season. Not to mention there's Cristall, too.
2) we're going to need that cap space to replace Carlson long-term, and Chychrun alone won't come close to being enough. We have multiple players who could potentially be top line wingers, but we have nobody that profiles as a 1D.
3) I'm not sure how fond Carbery is of Marner. He's talked positively about Matthews and Nylander on multiple occasions since becoming the Caps head coach, using them as examples of forwards who do various things well. I can't remember him mentioning Marner once. But even if he has, he talks about Matthews and Nylander a whole lot more.
In a world without a salary cap, that's a great problem. With a salary cap, it's extremely inefficient roster construction. Also, some players need to play with other skilled players to get the most out of them; Strome is a good example, which is why he's now on his 3rd team. So you have to balance this fight for spot with putting young players in a position to succeed and develop.I agree with 2) and don't really know anything about 3) but hard disagree on 1) here.
I think it's been proven time and again that if your prospects really are the top players fans always hope for they will force the issue. If Cristall, Miro, and Leonard all hit and all hit next year and you need to play Protas or Wilson or Miro or Leonard on the fourth line, that's a great problem to have!
the logjam is a best case scenario which would indicate that every prospect has reached their/ overachieved their potential. And if that’s the case the pieces will be valuable enough to trade in exchange for someone who could fill another need on the roster. If the cost to getting Marner is capspace (or a pick to retain his rights) it’s a no brainer IMO.I'm a fan of Marner, and wouldn't mind signing him. But:
1) it creates a serious log-jam at wing both short and long term. Leonard is one of the top prospects in hockey; they aren't keeping him on the 4th line for a whole season. Not to mention there's Cristall, too.
2) we're going to need that cap space to replace Carlson long-term, and Chychrun alone won't come close to being enough. We have multiple players who could potentially be top line wingers, but we have nobody that profiles as a 1D.
3) I'm not sure how fond Carbery is of Marner. He's talked positively about Matthews and Nylander on multiple occasions since becoming the Caps head coach, using them as examples of forwards who do various things well. I can't remember him mentioning Marner once. But even if he has, he talks about Matthews and Nylander a whole lot more.
Carbery's opinion is obviously the most critical here, because he knows Marner really well.
Also, unless Marner wil somehow prevent Ovi from getting injured, I don't think Ovi needs any more help getting to 895 -- he was doing just fine with Strome and Protas.
I love CMM and he's playing incredibly but come on nowPlease no Marner. CMM might be better now
Not a chance Leonard ends up in Hershey (except if the Caps miss the loffs and Hershey is in)I think there's no chance that Dowd doesn't come back (or they try to find the next Dowd in UFA). Having that 4th line be a no-doubt shutdown force is just too important to how the team is built and while I like Rybynski I don't see him being able to play anywhere close to that role.
I'd also assume Leonard starts in Hershey, Lappy is moved out, or both with a vet coming in UFA to play 3c or 3lw
Protas-Strome-Ovi
McMichael-Dubois-Wilson
Miro-XX-XX
Duhaime-Dowd-XX
lots of internal candidates to fill those slots but also plenty of space to go out and add again.
If neither a PMD or a top C is availible, should they just bank that cap space in your opinion? Because if they "just" run it back they're looking at probably 8-9M in capspace (5-6M if they bring back both goalies)Don’t want or need Marner. He’s a fine player. Don’t get me wrong.
But he’s not what this team needs. Either now, or down the line (unless something weird happens).
Caps need to keep a strong, puck moving D. Inevitably when the payroll gets trimmed, they will have money enough for wingers. And not 12.5m dollar ones.
If they saw a C they liked ar 12.5? I’d pause. Or a top D.
But that’s it. IMO
Theoretically that's a wild rental budget, but if you don't see a target that fits the team (preferably a few years) then.... I'm hesitant. You can spend it on pure rentals but there's not a lot of structure on this team that needs that type of improving.If neither a PMD or a top C is availible, should they just bank that cap space in your opinion? Because if they "just" run it back they're looking at probably 8-9M in capspace (5-6M if they bring back both goalies)
You will see. And yes its a big swing statement and maybe I just hate the leafs.I love CMM and he's playing incredibly but come on now
If neither a PMD or a top C is availible, should they just bank that cap space in your opinion? Because if they "just" run it back they're looking at probably 8-9M in capspace (5-6M if they bring back both goalies)
honestly I don't like his mannerisms, perceived attitude, and kind of just... the way he handles himself.You will see. And yes its a big swing statement and maybe I just hate the leafs.
I think Marner is very much over ratted and is a big game choker padding his stats and whoever pays him Mcdavid money is going to ruin their team
Yeah he is a very good offensive player, but McM also brings a better two way game compared to Marner. Would be interesting what McM could do with a little bit more PP time. I also dont see why you bring in Marner on a 14 mill contract unless you think the team can win within the next 2-3 years. After that the contract will have a very high risk of being negative value. Espescially when wingers even without Ovi is looking like a strong position for the Caps with McM, Wilson and Protas already on the team. So unless all of Leonard, Parascak, Cristall and Miro fails then winger wont be a need.You will see. And yes its a big swing statement and maybe I just hate the leafs.
I think Marner is very much over ratted and is a big game choker padding his stats and whoever pays him Mcdavid money is going to ruin their team
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...sQFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0SE3TiCpLdy6D1hE6gXfOqYeah he is a very good offensive player, but McM also brings a better two way game compared to Marner. Would be interesting what McM could do with a little bit more PP time. I also dont see why you bring in Marner on a 14 mill contract unless you think the team can win within the next 2-3 years. After that the contract will have a very high risk of being negative value. Espescially when wingers even without Ovi is looking like a strong position for the Caps with McM, Wilson and Protas already on the team. So unless all of Leonard, Parascak, Cristall and Miro fails then winger wont be a need.
I guess I just fundamentally disagree on the talent eval of Marner. Yes he has his warts, but I truly do believe that amongst wingers you're probably only taking Panarin, M. Tkachuk, and Kaprizov ahead of him the last five years. As for a two-way game, Marner has received Selke votes the last 6 years and finished 3rd two years ago. Amongst wingers, I'd only really have Mark Stone above him defensively.Yeah he is a very good offensive player, but McM also brings a better two way game compared to Marner. Would be interesting what McM could do with a little bit more PP time. I also dont see why you bring in Marner on a 14 mill contract unless you think the team can win within the next 2-3 years. After that the contract will have a very high risk of being negative value. Espescially when wingers even without Ovi is looking like a strong position for the Caps with McM, Wilson and Protas already on the team. So unless all of Leonard, Parascak, Cristall and Miro fails then winger wont be a need.
I think he'll start in the NHL this season but next year 1) the org has a proven track record of having guys play longer than most would like in Hershey and 2) the rest of the roster is in a much better shape than the end of last year when they wanted him to sign.Not a chance Leonard ends up in Hershey (except if the Caps miss the loffs and Hershey is in)
A.) He isn’t going to forego college to play in the AHL.
B.) BMac has said multiple times he is NHL ready
If he ends up back in Hershey, he will have had to play very poorly or show himself not ready…..I just don’t see it. He will have growing pains, but he’s going straight to the show, for good hopefully.I think he'll start in the NHL this season but next year 1) the org has a proven track record of having guys play longer than most would like in Hershey and 2) the rest of the roster is in a much better shape than the end of last year when they wanted him to sign.
They're also not going to gift Leonard a spot. If Leonard signs, he will have to earn his spot in the NHL just like everyone else. If Leonard is one of their best twelve forwards (he won't be #13 or #14), then he'll be on the team next fall. And if he struggles, he will go to the AHL, play top line minutes, and be the first guy called up when there is an injury.I think he'll start in the NHL this season but next year 1) the org has a proven track record of having guys play longer than most would like in Hershey and 2) the rest of the roster is in a much better shape than the end of last year when they wanted him to sign.
I’d add Kucherov, Pastrnak and Rantanen to that conversation as well, but I agree with you point! II guess I just fundamentally disagree on the talent eval of Marner. Yes he has his warts, but I truly do believe that amongst wingers you're probably only taking Panarin, M. Tkachuk, and Kaprizov ahead of him the last five years. As for a two-way game, Marner has received Selke votes the last 6 years and finished 3rd two years ago. Amongst wingers, I'd only really have Mark Stone above him defensively.
Obviously there's still a limit (I wouldn't go to $14M for example), but that's the kind of player you move plans around for. I think the rest of this team has proven already that there's a great foundation here, but what we lack is still that true game-breaking forward. Marner (or Rantanen!) would be that guy for us.
And while I get the point about a 1d to take over for Carlson, that guy just isn't even potentially available.