Speculation: Caps Roster General Discussion (Coaching/FAs/Cap/Lines etc) - 2022-23 Season Part 3: Drop the puck!

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlexModvechkin8

At least there was 2018.
Sponsor
Feb 18, 2012
27,555
27,271
District of Champions
I'm still confused as to what Strome did to be taken away from Ovie.

The line was very successful, they weren't even slumping.
Part of me is ok with the shuffling. It’s January, they’ve recently added Oshie, Backstrom, and Wilson back into the lineup so they need to see who works with who, and it should help break up the doldrums of January and February but the other part of me wonders why’d they fix what ain’t broke, especially when the playoffs are far from assured right now. Seems risky to throw a grenade to the lineup card instead of making changes on a more specific and tactical level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hivemind

Calicaps

NFA
Aug 3, 2006
22,574
15,664
Almost Canada
The Ovie-Strome-Sheary line has been super and can easily be reconstituted. But with the addition of 19 and 43, is it still the best option for deploying those 3? Maybe. Maybe not. Now is the time to find out. I'm sure if those 3 players (and especially 8) go cold, they'll quickly be reunited, just as they have been at various times this year already.
 

Ridley Simon

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
19,057
10,390
Marin County — SF Bay Area, CA
These are some lines.


I don’t really get why they don’t just leave 8/17/73 alone. It worked.

The other thing — is we need to stop thinking about “1st line” vs “2nd line” vs “3rd line”. Its silly.

Caps have 11 top 9 forwards, and 2 fantastic 4th line forwards. Then NAK.

How the 11 shakes out into 3 lines shouldn’t be earmarked at 1st or 2nd or 3rd. They are just 3 top lines. They will play based on even TOI and special teams allotment.

Just get the best chemistry you can with the 11, move one to LW with 26/21, and sit one (or trade one).

Doesn’t need to be too hard
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
66,415
21,422
I don’t really get why they don’t just leave 8/17/73 alone. It worked.

The other thing — is we need to stop thinking about “1st line” vs “2nd line” vs “3rd line”. Its silly.

Caps have 11 top 9 forwards, and 2 fantastic 4th line forwards. Then NAK.

How the 11 shakes out into 3 lines shouldn’t be earmarked at 1st or 2nd or 3rd. They are just 3 top lines. They will play based on even TOI and special teams allotment.

Just get the best chemistry you can with the 11, move one to LW with 26/21, and sit one (or trade one).

Doesn’t need to be too hard
Ice time and deployments will clarify which is which….let’s see who is top-6 vs top-9…game situations may dictate that will rotate….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Calicaps

RedRocking

Registered User
Jan 8, 2022
7,406
8,825
NoCal
I don’t really get why they don’t just leave 8/17/73 alone. It worked.

The other thing — is we need to stop thinking about “1st line” vs “2nd line” vs “3rd line”. Its silly.

Caps have 11 top 9 forwards, and 2 fantastic 4th line forwards. Then NAK.

How the 11 shakes out into 3 lines shouldn’t be earmarked at 1st or 2nd or 3rd. They are just 3 top lines. They will play based on even TOI and special teams allotment.

Just get the best chemistry you can with the 11, move one to LW with 26/21, and sit one (or trade one).

Doesn’t need to be too hard
Chaos coaching! This is great, since it means any and all lines we brainstorm may be possible, lol.

Definitely some curious choices - but having too much depth is certainly a good problem. And at least the right guys are playing C. I like keeping Kuzy and Milano together for pace. Otherwise it’s too much of Kuzy trying to McDavid his way through 3 guys with no help.

Otherwise, Strome should be stapled to Ovi. Not sure when the staff will get that through their heads. We’ll see how the TOI allotments work out - but like others have said, the middle six is kinda meaningless (as far as 2nd vs 3rd line). This team can’t necessarily match an elite team’s top 6 anymore - instead their strength is this depth, where scoring can come from anywhere.

While I don’t love Eller at wing (or playing over Mantha), I understand being a little worried about Nick’s ability to carry the defensive responsibilities of playing center until (if) he gets his legs under him. Especially in Lavi’s system where forwards get left on an island when the D activate, it makes sense to shelter Nick with some better defensive guys (though Mantha or Willy would probably be better).
 

Jags

Mildly Disturbed
May 5, 2016
1,981
2,388
Central Florida
Otherwise, Strome should be stapled to Ovi.

Well, Strome has only proven himself capable of leveraging 3 straight elite snipers. Kuznetsov is hit-and-miss with one, so he's the clear choice for that spot with Ovi. ;)

It'll all come out in the wash. Laviolette has made it clear that he's tinkering. Makes a little sense with 2 guys coming back into the top of the lineup. Not my preference, but he'll either prove his methodology works or prove that he doesn't belong here.

I hope it works out. :thumbu:
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedRocking

kicksavedave

I'm just here for the memes and gifs.
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2009
11,394
14,581
Fallbrook, CA
www.tiasarms.org
better than a skull fracture but yikes

Well, re-attaching an ear should not require several months to heal... so I'm guessing he did in fact have a skull fracture but that's not being reported/shared. The ear thing isn't that dramatic that they felt it needed to be hidden and it should also not be an LTIR thing either. Reading Gina's post, the doctors told him not to walk for a bit, not to ride a bike for a bit.. .and that sounds like a more serious thing than just re-attaching the ear.

We all know how garbage NHL injury reports are.
 

twabby

Registered User
Mar 9, 2010
14,169
15,706
Well, re-attaching an ear should not require several months to heal... so I'm guessing he did in fact have a skull fracture but that's not being reported/shared. The ear thing isn't that dramatic that they felt it needed to be hidden and it should also not be an LTIR thing either. Reading Gina's post, the doctors told him not to walk for a bit, not to ride a bike for a bit.. .and that sounds like a more serious thing than just re-attaching the ear.

We all know how garbage NHL injury reports are.

The Mayo Clinic website says it could take up to 3 months for ear reconstruction surgery to fully heal depending on the severity so it might just be the ear. The timeline makes sense with a return near the end of the regular season, at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drakon

HeyMattyB

Sports bring out the worst in everyone.
Sponsor
Aug 20, 2010
2,394
2,791
Philadelphia, PA
The Mayo Clinic website says it could take up to 3 months for ear reconstruction surgery to fully heal depending on the severity so it might just be the ear. The timeline makes sense with a return near the end of the regular season, at least.
How dare you post easily-googleable, fact-based search results from a reputable source when there is endless fan speculation and conspiracy theorizing to be done, sir?

How dare you??
 

Raikkonen

Dumb guy
Aug 19, 2009
10,735
3,182
Russia
If it's anything like "The illustrious Nicklas Backstrom can't possibly play on a third line!" then put him on the 3rd line and call it the 2nd line. The minutes, deployments, and wing talent are pretty much the same
come on
this is exactly what you're looking on
 

Raikkonen

Dumb guy
Aug 19, 2009
10,735
3,182
Russia
@Carlson

maybe there is no damage to the skull

if the puck hit the ear it was probably the minimal angle to the head, hopefully

maybe it was the helmet though, and then the angle could have been worse

wishing him speedy recovery
 

Jags

Mildly Disturbed
May 5, 2016
1,981
2,388
Central Florida
Dat is F’ed up…..he was already goofy looking!

Yeah, in our house the term for Carlson's look has always been "Resting Dope Face."

He went through a stretch many years ago, lots of gaffes, boneheaded stuff. We started to talk about him like he's dumb. At some point I said, "I don't know. I think that's just his face."

And she said, "How's that?"

"Look at his player pic on the website. Not a bad looking guy, but he looks like a dummy."

"Yeah, so he's dumb. That's what I said."

"Right, but what I'M saying is that's just how his face is. He's probably not dumb, he just looks dumb. Like all things being equal, his face really wants you to think he's not smart."

"So you're saying he's smart?"

"He could be smart. But his face has no choice. That's just how it is."

"So he just looks dumb..."

"Yeah. Can't control it. Like your resting heart rate. He has Resting Dope Face."

"Is that 'dope' like he's dopey? Or like he smokes dope?"

"Is there a difference?"

For the record, we really like John Carlson a lot. Big fans. But these are the kinds of discussions we have when we're watching hockey with a few bottlecaps strewn about.
 
Last edited:

DWGie26

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 6, 2019
4,455
4,708
NOVA
Yeah, in our house the term for Carlson's look has always been "Resting Dope Face."

He went through a stretch many years ago, lots of gaffes, boneheaded stuff. We started to talk about him like he's dumb. At some point I said, "I don't know. I think that's just his face."

And she said, "How's that?"

"Look at his player pic on the website. Not a bad looking guy, but he looks like a dummy."

"Yeah, so he's dumb. That's what I said."

"Right, but what I'M saying is that's just how his face is. He's probably not dumb, he just looks dumb. Like all things being equal, his face really wants you to think he's not smart."

"So you're saying he's smart?"

"He could be smart. But his face has no choice. That's just how it is."

"So he just looks dumb..."

"Yeah. Can't control it. Like your resting heart rate. He has Resting Dope Face."

"Is that 'dope' like he's dopey? Or like he smokes dope?"

"Is there a difference?"

For the record, we really like John Carlson a lot. Big fans. But these are the kinds of discussions we have when we're watching hockey with a few bottlecaps strewn about.
Hmm… I‘d like to throw around some bottle caps with you. Sounds fun!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jags

kicksavedave

I'm just here for the memes and gifs.
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2009
11,394
14,581
Fallbrook, CA
www.tiasarms.org
The Mayo Clinic website says it could take up to 3 months for ear reconstruction surgery to fully heal depending on the severity so it might just be the ear. The timeline makes sense with a return near the end of the regular season, at least.

I prefer my rampant speculation to the Mayo Clinic's web wordz, thanks :D

We could definitely drill down into the differences between "re-attached" and "reconstructed", though, if we get bored during the GDT tonight ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: twabby

g00n

Retired Global Mod
Nov 22, 2007
31,278
15,888
A lacerated ear might just need to start mending and then maybe wear a special helmet that protects the wound somewhat. Dunno. But if a huge part of the ear is sheared off I don't see how anyone could fully protect it and play hockey until it's completely mended 100%.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad