OT: Capitals Cinema Club: TV and Movies

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,467
14,121
Philadelphia
I might have bad news, because I've tried two or three times to get in to Westworld and I still can't clear two episodes. I fully acknowledge that the concept is neat but the episodes don't move enough for me. I feel like knowing HBO there's a kick that I'm missing but I don't know if I'll have the tolerance for a slow build on a Rogue One character I didn't care about, so if it's that.... man....

If it's just a quality comparison, like we won't call it the Wire or the Sopranos, then I get that. But on the scale of those two, Breaking Bad, Band of Brothers, Mad Men, etc. is it truly great television?
The Westworld name drop was just a quality comparison, not much in terms of style (although there could be some very loose parallels I suppose). I thought Westworld season 1 was fantastic, but then that show dropped off a cliff in terms of quality. Season 2 had one really good episode, but otherwise that show was pretty terrible after season 1 (which, again, was fantastic).

Andor is very much a slow burn. And the main character/protagonist is indeed the titular Andor. But it's not a singular PoV show like many other Star Wars shows have been (namely Boba Fett and Mando seasons 1 & 2). You get a multitude of characters and side-plots. You get different perspectives. It's much more about the oppression and nature of the Empire and how the Rebellion congealed than it is about Andor specifically.

Andor only came out in 2022 and only has one season out so far, so it's a little premature to be crowning it among the all-time greats, but I certainly think it has the potential to be up there. Personally, I enjoy Andor more than The Sopranos, Man Men, and large chunks of Breaking Bad (which has more flaws than you remember upon re-watches).

during Annie's grief session she mentions how her brother went insane and killed himself which I attributed to a failed possestion by Paimon.
This is 100% the case. She mentions that his suicide note mentions that his mom was "putting people inside him." She also mentions her father killed himself via starvation. Her mother had been trying to possess their entire male line
 
  • Like
Reactions: JayBeagleFanAccount

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,556
11,475
George Lucas will be ridiculed for that line for the rest of his existence.
so, I have a nerd theory about why it works for them, but I also loved when Mythbusters tested it and found that it's actually goddamn hard to defend your ankles from somebody you can only attack from above. I think they came out to a draw.

If you really wanted to dork out on it, one thing I've internalized is that Obi-Wan's got a famously defensive style and he's really good at it, so if you give him an advantage he's going to know how to use it. Knowing Anakin is going to go for broke makes the thing relatively, uh, "tilted" so to speak but you need a lot of lore or internet comments full of lore ingested before that makes sense that it feels more like post-hoc justification than actual story intent.
 

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,467
14,121
Philadelphia
My favorite was when Obi-Wan was like "it's over, I have the high ground" on like... a slope, when I was sitting there going "bitch do you not remember when you did super flips over a guy off your fingertips from the inside of a vertical pipe, landed behind him, and cut him completely in half?"

Yeah, he was right, but my in-series brain went "okay what the f*** was that?"
My favorite prequel Jedi inconsistency is when Qui-Gon and Darth Maul are dueling, and Obi-Wan is trying to run thru the laser gates to catch up to them. He can't quite make it and gets stuck behind the gate and has to watch his master die.

Yet, an hour earlier in the movie, both Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan use super speed to dash away from battle droids during the opening of the movie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaosLord and HTFN

usiel

Where wolf’s ears are, wolf’s teeth are near.
Sponsor
Jul 29, 2002
15,969
4,773
Klendathu
www.myspace.com
For a director that (somehow) commands such a rabid fanbase, it's amazing that he doesn't get any of his movie's right on the first try and always needs a director's cut. :laugh:
I hear ya. Though I still dig The Watchmen DC which I can watch over an over. That black and white 4:3 DC comics monstrosity DC can be dropped off in the deep end of the ocean.
 

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,467
14,121
Philadelphia
I hear ya. Though I still dig The Watchmen DC which I can watch over an over. That black and white 4:3 DC comics monstrosity DC can be dropped off in the deep end of the ocean.
Watchmen is also the last Snyder film I enjoyed. All the DCEU films are so bad.
 

usiel

Where wolf’s ears are, wolf’s teeth are near.
Sponsor
Jul 29, 2002
15,969
4,773
Klendathu
www.myspace.com
Watchmen is also the last Snyder film I enjoyed. All the DCEU films are so bad.
Agreed generally other than MoS and both WW films (even though the second was could be considered fair). DC comics titles in generaly, and imho, is just far more problematic for a persuasive universe for the film category because its more kid based in a sense. Marvel generally had an older audience.

I think the problem with DC that if you kept to the spirit of comics its pretty bland for adults. They've tried to add a grimdark take to it to mostly fail for their big titles. Maybe they should just embrace their PG IP.
 

Ovechkins Wodka

Registered User
Dec 1, 2007
18,822
8,723
DC
Watched the new Transformers movie on paramount+. Its was a pretty fun one, Im a sucker for 90s hip hop and Pete Davidson added some humor. I think it was my favorite one yet but thats not saying much.
 

Jags

Mildly Disturbed
May 5, 2016
1,981
2,383
Central Florida
Edit: co-sign @Hivemind ’s description of Andor. It’s one of the best shows of the year, period - not just sci-fi. It’s the best SW anything in recent memory

Andor is a really good show with the little caveat that you have to be into Star Wars. And that's a sticking point because the Star Wars movie franchise is 2 really good movies, 2 or 3 pretty good ones, and at least 4 or 5 that kinda suck. And you can say roughly the same thing about the hit-or-miss rate of the 40 TV shows they've made lately.

So Andor being great is kinda like saying, "That guy is a pretty shitty human being, but his left ear is really cool."

Star Wars overall is a ho-hum but massive franchise built on the foundation of two really solid movies that were pretty lean on world building and characterization (very "white hat vs. black hat" broad stroke hamfistedness). That shaky foundation started to really show in the third movie and they've added a ton of content since then without addressing the issue all that much. Their one real attempt to really add to it produced the three worst movies they ever made.

Andor's quality stands out so much because most of the rest of it is so unremarkable, and that weighs down its quality as a standalone property pretty mightily. Without an abiding appreciation for the rest of it, comparing it to The Sopranos or Breaking Bad isn't the best idea.

Removing that stigma makes it more of a limited series, even though it'll have two seasons. And even then it'd have to compete with the likes of Band of Brothers, Chernobyl, and like half a dozen others just at HBO, and Netflix has had a few great ones, too. Probably best to stick to sci-fi comparisons because the genre hasn't yielded as much brilliance as its fans claim.

I really dug Andor, but let's not get crazy. Now, commence tomato-throwing. ;)
 
Last edited:

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,467
14,121
Philadelphia
Now, commence tomato-throwing. ;)
giphy.gif


I'd honestly be curious to see what someone with zero familiarity with Star Wars thinks of Andor. Aside of the various Easter Eggs (mostly in the background), it's not really expecting you to know much about Star Wars canon to function as a show (certainly less than Ahsoka is, for instance). There's no Skywalkers or Jedi or Sith to worry about. It doesn't expect you to know what the Force is or how it works. It doesn't really explain who or what the Empire is, but I doubt it's particularly hard to pick up on that as you go. I think the only real area it kind of expects knowledge from the viewer is who Emperor Palpatine is and what he's done in the past. Knowing who Mon Mothma and Saw Guerrera are likely also enhance things, but it's definitely not required knowledge.

Star Wars overall is a ho-hum but massive franchise built on the foundation of two really solid movies that were pretty lean on world building and characterization (very "white hat vs. black hat" broad stroke hamfistedness).
Not gonna go into the whole post (portions of which I agree with), but I think this would be our central disagreements on Star Wars.

I disagree that the OT is lean on world building. World building is one of the areas that Star Wars excels at. It's why the franchise has the legs it does, and why its captured the imaginations of so many. The OT did world building excellently, creating a setting an environment that was grand in scale with allusions and references to plenty of things to excite the viewer's imagination. It shows you fantastic environments and diverse alien races, it presents to you a whole host of different ways that people in the galaxy approach life. It builds a setting that people want to experience more adventures in. If anything, Star Wars has become guilty of over-explaining things since the OT, trying to create canon backstories to every background character and line of dialogue that leave the world devoid of mystery.

Perhaps more importantly, I don't think it's "white hat vs black hat" is ham fisted at all in the OT. While there are moments since then that it delves into ham fisted territory, I strongly disagree with the notion of "good" vs "evil" being a ham fisted concept as a whole. Star Wars is modernist, it's not the post-modern (and post-post-modern) cinema of the 2020s. Star Wars was creating a genre, not deconstructing one. Not everything needs to be putting heroism under an ethical microscope and examining the moral quandaries someone would engage in to do good. It can be fine to simply have good guys and bad guys sometimes, especially in something with a family-friendly nature like the original trilogy. It's okay that the overtly fascist Empire is just bad, not some "necessary evil." It's okay that the Sith using the force in their own self-interest to accumulate power is viewed as being the "dark side." If anything, it's some of Star Wars' first attempts to go beyond these simple boundaries that it does stumble (the prequel trilogy). This doesn't mean that post-modern deconstruction is bad, and Andor certainly engages in this kind of moral quandaries. It just means that deconstructing good and evil isn't the exclusive way to do things.
 

ChaosLord

Registered User
Jan 16, 2010
5,209
1,204
The OT did a great job with world building. It since then (ie ROTJ in 1983) that Star Wars has struggled with world building. Particularly, IMO, with force wielders. Force wielders should not be restricted to the Jedi and Sith, but for a long time, they were. To compound that problem, you had the rule of two, so the number of Sith who've appeared over the last few decades have been few and far between (mostly just Sidious and his apprentice of the month).

This is why I'm excited about Ahsoka so much. At last we are seeing dark side users who are definitely not Sith. Dark Jedi, Fallen Jedi, God knows what they are, but the important thing is the pool of potential force wielders is at long last being expanded upon.
 
Last edited:

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
66,413
21,414
Watched the new Transformers movie on paramount+. Its was a pretty fun one, Im a sucker for 90s hip hop and Pete Davidson added some humor. I think it was my favorite one yet but thats not saying much.
They’re all kind meh, but I still like giant robots and won’t complain. The dude from Hamilton was likable…Pete was actually ok.
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
66,413
21,414
BTW, Untold: Swamp Kings was entertaining as hell. It was like seeing The Program in real life….only slightly reigned in….

As a Gator-hater, I have some newfound respect.
 

Jags

Mildly Disturbed
May 5, 2016
1,981
2,383
Central Florida
I'd honestly be curious to see what someone with zero familiarity with Star Wars thinks of Andor.

Without the backdrop, it would most likely feel UNDER-developed. Creating and characterizing a society in short order is complicated. Someone with zero Star Wars knowledge would also have zero interest. Someone that's never seen any Star Wars has made a decision that's not likely to be undone by a "Yeah, but you don't need to know anything about Star Wars to appreciate THIS Star Wars thing" argument.

You'd be better off not telling them it's Star Wars at all, let them get through both seasons and give them Rogue One, and have them reach the end and go "Wait a f***ing minute! You tricked me! Now I have to watch those damn space samurai movies." Then you get all excited and start talking about the trilogy of trilogies and Machete Order and all that nonsense and they punch you in the nose and never talk to you again.

And that's whether they watch it or not, because watching the whole damn thing just isn't worth it. I'm not even sure if including the shows in a chronological telling of the thing makes it better or worse. It's kind of a slog either way because of the neverending inconsistency.

I disagree that the OT is lean on world building. World building is one of the areas that Star Wars excels at.

In a trilogy that's showing you universes, they were good a building the intimate and insular world the stories actually depict. They show you glimpses of this massive thing but it rarely feels that grand in scope.

Kinda like the Thor movies. In 4 movies they showed us the world of Asgard plenty. And were it not for a couple of zoomed-out shots of big crowds, Asgard always feels like a pretty small place populated by about 200 people.

It's not fair to "blame" A New Hope and Empire for not building a foundation onto which you can drop 40+ years of continuity. They're telling you a pretty intimate story in the OT that happens to turn on larger concepts that never feel as large as described. They phoned it in at the end of Jedi, so it landed with a bit of a thud, but they did a decent job overall. The OT is plenty of fun.

I admit my overall feeling includes the benefit of hindsight. It should have been easy to expound upon the OT in instantly fulfilling ways, but Lucas wasn't the writer for that stunt. He was clumsier in the second trilogy than he was in the first. And the many swings at it since then have illustrated that the OT wasn't that sturdy a foundation.

You don't jump to Chapter 4 for no reason. You jump to Chapter 4 when you've thought a lot about Chapters 1-3 and feel like they're no fun. And he just thought a lot about them. He didn't actually, fully know what those building blocks even were.

Perhaps more importantly, I don't think it's "white hat vs black hat" is ham fisted at all in the OT.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this point. If you're going to make it an argument between simple good vs. evil stories and the popularity of moral complexity these days, then you have to concede that the OT tried to have it both ways. You get the full tragedy of Anakin from the end of Empire through Jedi, and it's massively rushed, underdone, and fails to land. Nothing illustrates the fact that George Lucas was a novice writer more than that.

He did too much of his writing in retrospect. Major elements of the plot were clearly revisions. I agree that there's nothing wrong with a *good* white hat/black hat story. I'm a John Wayne fan. But the OT isn't that. Jedi completely subverts that notion in the end, which would be okay (even great) if he pulled it off. But instead it lands like an improvised switcheroo.

Part of it was probably circumstance. He made the first one on a shoestring and it ended up being the biggest surprise smash ever, before or since. Then he had to make two more, stumbled upon some narrative contradictions, and probably didn't have the backing he needed for the truly necessary fourth installment, whether it was the cast wanting out or whatever else. But if that was the case, then there was truly no excuse for Jedi. Assuming the script was completely written before production, someone should have but a stop to it and either gotten him some help or just given him more notes and time.

So there were probably reasons, but the OT -- while very entertaining and certainly worthy of many of its accolades -- was riddled with narrative flaws.

Looking at all the SW content that's out now, I honestly hope I'm alive when/if someone great reboots it. If someone did a Peter Jackson LotR job on the Star Wars saga -- distilling it down to its best elements and faithfully bringing them to the screen in epic fashion -- I'd be first in line. There's a great story in there, you just have to find it and burn the rest.
 

Ovechkins Wodka

Registered User
Dec 1, 2007
18,822
8,723
DC
I want to say Andor kind of boring but I just watched 6 episodes and 6 has been the best for far.

I do appreciate they have recaps before every episode. If I don’t wanna see them, I can press the skip button, but I usually enjoy the recap.
 

CapitalsCupReality

It’s Go Time!!
Feb 27, 2002
66,413
21,414
Without the backdrop, it would most likely feel UNDER-developed. Creating and characterizing a society in short order is complicated. Someone with zero Star Wars knowledge would also have zero interest. Someone that's never seen any Star Wars has made a decision that's not likely to be undone by a "Yeah, but you don't need to know anything about Star Wars to appreciate THIS Star Wars thing" argument.

You'd be better off not telling them it's Star Wars at all, let them get through both seasons and give them Rogue One, and have them reach the end and go "Wait a f***ing minute! You tricked me! Now I have to watch those damn space samurai movies." Then you get all excited and start talking about the trilogy of trilogies and Machete Order and all that nonsense and they punch you in the nose and never talk to you again.

And that's whether they watch it or not, because watching the whole damn thing just isn't worth it. I'm not even sure if including the shows in a chronological telling of the thing makes it better or worse. It's kind of a slog either way because of the neverending inconsistency.



In a trilogy that's showing you universes, they were good a building the intimate and insular world the stories actually depict. They show you glimpses of this massive thing but it rarely feels that grand in scope.

Kinda like the Thor movies. In 4 movies they showed us the world of Asgard plenty. And were it not for a couple of zoomed-out shots of big crowds, Asgard always feels like a pretty small place populated by about 200 people.

It's not fair to "blame" A New Hope and Empire for not building a foundation onto which you can drop 40+ years of continuity. They're telling you a pretty intimate story in the OT that happens to turn on larger concepts that never feel as large as described. They phoned it in at the end of Jedi, so it landed with a bit of a thud, but they did a decent job overall. The OT is plenty of fun.

I admit my overall feeling includes the benefit of hindsight. It should have been easy to expound upon the OT in instantly fulfilling ways, but Lucas wasn't the writer for that stunt. He was clumsier in the second trilogy than he was in the first. And the many swings at it since then have illustrated that the OT wasn't that sturdy a foundation.

You don't jump to Chapter 4 for no reason. You jump to Chapter 4 when you've thought a lot about Chapters 1-3 and feel like they're no fun. And he just thought a lot about them. He didn't actually, fully know what those building blocks even were.



We'll have to agree to disagree on this point. If you're going to make it an argument between simple good vs. evil stories and the popularity of moral complexity these days, then you have to concede that the OT tried to have it both ways. You get the full tragedy of Anakin from the end of Empire through Jedi, and it's massively rushed, underdone, and fails to land. Nothing illustrates the fact that George Lucas was a novice writer more than that.

He did too much of his writing in retrospect. Major elements of the plot were clearly revisions. I agree that there's nothing wrong with a *good* white hat/black hat story. I'm a John Wayne fan. But the OT isn't that. Jedi completely subverts that notion in the end, which would be okay (even great) if he pulled it off. But instead it lands like an improvised switcheroo.

Part of it was probably circumstance. He made the first one on a shoestring and it ended up being the biggest surprise smash ever, before or since. Then he had to make two more, stumbled upon some narrative contradictions, and probably didn't have the backing he needed for the truly necessary fourth installment, whether it was the cast wanting out or whatever else. But if that was the case, then there was truly no excuse for Jedi. Assuming the script was completely written before production, someone should have but a stop to it and either gotten him some help or just given him more notes and time.

So there were probably reasons, but the OT -- while very entertaining and certainly worthy of many of its accolades -- was riddled with narrative flaws.

Looking at all the SW content that's out now, I honestly hope I'm alive when/if someone great reboots it. If someone did a Peter Jackson LotR job on the Star Wars saga -- distilling it down to its best elements and faithfully bringing them to the screen in epic fashion -- I'd be first in line. There's a great story in there, you just have to find it and burn the rest.
Wizards…..space Wizards….

I want to say Andor kind of boring but I just watched 6 episodes and 6 has been the best for far.

I do appreciate they have recaps before every episode. If I don’t wanna see them, I can press the skip button, but I usually enjoy the recap.
It’s a regular drama just in the SW world. Episode 6 is one of the better..but there are still a few more as good or better.
 

Ajax1995

Registered User
Dec 9, 2002
8,904
931
Without the backdrop, it would most likely feel UNDER-developed. Creating and characterizing a society in short order is complicated. Someone with zero Star Wars knowledge would also have zero interest. Someone that's never seen any Star Wars has made a decision that's not likely to be undone by a "Yeah, but you don't need to know anything about Star Wars to appreciate THIS Star Wars thing" argument.

You'd be better off not telling them it's Star Wars at all, let them get through both seasons and give them Rogue One, and have them reach the end and go "Wait a f***ing minute! You tricked me! Now I have to watch those damn space samurai movies." Then you get all excited and start talking about the trilogy of trilogies and Machete Order and all that nonsense and they punch you in the nose and never talk to you again.

And that's whether they watch it or not, because watching the whole damn thing just isn't worth it. I'm not even sure if including the shows in a chronological telling of the thing makes it better or worse. It's kind of a slog either way because of the neverending inconsistency.



In a trilogy that's showing you universes, they were good a building the intimate and insular world the stories actually depict. They show you glimpses of this massive thing but it rarely feels that grand in scope.

Kinda like the Thor movies. In 4 movies they showed us the world of Asgard plenty. And were it not for a couple of zoomed-out shots of big crowds, Asgard always feels like a pretty small place populated by about 200 people.

It's not fair to "blame" A New Hope and Empire for not building a foundation onto which you can drop 40+ years of continuity. They're telling you a pretty intimate story in the OT that happens to turn on larger concepts that never feel as large as described. They phoned it in at the end of Jedi, so it landed with a bit of a thud, but they did a decent job overall. The OT is plenty of fun.

I admit my overall feeling includes the benefit of hindsight. It should have been easy to expound upon the OT in instantly fulfilling ways, but Lucas wasn't the writer for that stunt. He was clumsier in the second trilogy than he was in the first. And the many swings at it since then have illustrated that the OT wasn't that sturdy a foundation.

You don't jump to Chapter 4 for no reason. You jump to Chapter 4 when you've thought a lot about Chapters 1-3 and feel like they're no fun. And he just thought a lot about them. He didn't actually, fully know what those building blocks even were.



We'll have to agree to disagree on this point. If you're going to make it an argument between simple good vs. evil stories and the popularity of moral complexity these days, then you have to concede that the OT tried to have it both ways. You get the full tragedy of Anakin from the end of Empire through Jedi, and it's massively rushed, underdone, and fails to land. Nothing illustrates the fact that George Lucas was a novice writer more than that.

He did too much of his writing in retrospect. Major elements of the plot were clearly revisions. I agree that there's nothing wrong with a *good* white hat/black hat story. I'm a John Wayne fan. But the OT isn't that. Jedi completely subverts that notion in the end, which would be okay (even great) if he pulled it off. But instead it lands like an improvised switcheroo.

Part of it was probably circumstance. He made the first one on a shoestring and it ended up being the biggest surprise smash ever, before or since. Then he had to make two more, stumbled upon some narrative contradictions, and probably didn't have the backing he needed for the truly necessary fourth installment, whether it was the cast wanting out or whatever else. But if that was the case, then there was truly no excuse for Jedi. Assuming the script was completely written before production, someone should have but a stop to it and either gotten him some help or just given him more notes and time.

So there were probably reasons, but the OT -- while very entertaining and certainly worthy of many of its accolades -- was riddled with narrative flaws.

Looking at all the SW content that's out now, I honestly hope I'm alive when/if someone great reboots it. If someone did a Peter Jackson LotR job on the Star Wars saga -- distilling it down to its best elements and faithfully bringing them to the screen in epic fashion -- I'd be first in line. There's a great story in there, you just have to find it and burn the rest.
Are you a government employee…? ;)
 

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,556
11,475
Alright, I immediately found myself falling asleep trying to start the show, so I put it off. Wasn't the show's fault, just started too late in the day.

Today though, nothing else going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hivemind

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,467
14,121
Philadelphia
@Jags

No way can I parse thru everything you wrote there in any reasonable amount of time, but I wanted to post some snippet responses to the highlights.

Re - World Building
Not all world-building has to be the GRRM-style of "we're gonna have a million factions and a million characters and elaborate spelled out histories for each." We dont' need a buncho f different perspective characters to make the universe feel large and alive, and the OT does it excellently. Sure, we follow one band of characters along, but we get enough of the setting and environment they're in to feel like it's an immersive environment.

There's a reason the Cantina scene has been copied over-and-over-and-over again by other Sci-fi and Fantasy projects (including future Star Wars movies, no less). It's an excellent example of world building. It makes the universe feel lived in and shows the viewer the wide array of aliens and outlaws in this universe. It's an homage to Casablanca, but it takes on a life of its own in this sci-fi universe. A "wretched hive of scum and villainy" indeed. And we get varying degrees similar experiences at Yavin IV, Hoth, Cloud City, Dagobah, the bounty hunter scene on the Star Destroyer, etc. It gives us peeks into the universe beyond in ways that make it feel alive and immense.

If there's anything that makes the Star Wars universe feel small, it's actually the later content, and particularly that directed by Dave Filoni (who has stated publicly its his goal to make the universe feel smaller). Lucas started the trend of "everybody knowing everyone else" and a bunch of randomly interconnected backstories in the prequels, but Filoni has taken that to the extreme in his projects.

Re - Episode IV

Despite Lucas' myth-building, Star Wars didn't actually start out as a pre-planned Episode IV. The EpIv and "A New Hope" tags were added in 1981. It was inteded to be a standalone movie, with very cautious plans for a shoestring budget sequel (Splinter of the Mind's Eye, which featured a wildly different plot than EpV) if it found moderate success. All of the supposed planning for Ep1-3 and overarching story (including the Skywalker family tree) was created after Star Wars was a cultural phenomenon.

Re - George Lucas
Don't mistake my defense of the original trilogy as a claim that Lucas is a brilliant writer or a genius. The original trilogy works because he had people who would say "No, that's dumb" to him at the time. He had others to help him write and direct. He didn't have that in the prequel trilogy, and that's a huge part of why it sucked.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad