puckpilot
Registered User
- Oct 23, 2016
- 1,229
- 894
Tanev + Virtanen + Subban + 2nd for Kane + Reinhart
I think Vancouver wouldn't mind that at all, but I don't see Buffalo doing it. Well unless they're that desperate to get rid of Kane.
Tanev + Virtanen + Subban + 2nd for Kane + Reinhart
Buffalo never takes that deal. Tanev is great, but it's too hard to find a top 6 center in the league. Vancouver just found that out when Columbus to PLD at 3, ahead of draft projections.
Tanev + JV + CBJ 2nd for Kane + Reinhart
And yet they need to get replacements for all those players. Kane's replacement will be 4+ in top 6. Moulson was top 6 and will be 4+ to replace. etc etc etc. Just because a player comes off the books doesn't man you get ALL of that cap space back. Buffalo may have some ELC's ready to come in for some of them, but not all of them if they want to be competitive.
AsI recall Pens don't have Staal anymore because they could no longer afford him with Crosbies and Malkins raises. Same will happen in Buff, Eichel is key to the future, and they will have to choose between O-Reilly(who has an NTC i think) or Reinhart.
They already have two top 6 centers in O'Reilly and Eichel. What they don't have is a defensive rock like Tanev. And the cost for one of those, well, Edmonton just found out this summer
Right now, Buffalo would get the best player in the deal. Reinhart may eventually become a true number one center but that's never a certainty and Vancouver takes all the risk by taking on a **** like Kane who has been playing like a 4th liner