RobertKron
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2007
- 16,441
- 10,212
I don't know what kind of a player Dickinson ends up being and if he is worth the contract or cost or not. We will find out.
But seriously, come on: The above poster is making a point saying you have to give away the puck to score and that possession is not everything. It has been proven so many ways in the history of sport that having the puck/ball is only a tool for either not allowing the other team to score, to create the opportunity to take the risk to try to score, and/or in some cases to rest and recover. But he is absolutely correct that the objective of the game is to score; and ultimately give the other team possession.
And come on, we would all rather have a player who wins the puck back a lot (takeaways) so that we can try to give the puck away again -)); who is willing to hurl his body in front of pucks to stop the other team from scoring (blocks); and who hits people in order to try to separate them from pucks than to have a player that does not do those things (all other things being equal). To say (or imply) otherwise is an absurd argument, kind of parallel to the argument that scoring a goal is the equivalent to giving the puck away- Which, I am taking as his point- it really isn't that hard.
Even with this stupid absurdist reasoning that doesn’t even make any sense regarding OP’s original statement about how people who block a lot of shots spend a lot of time not in control of the puck: you do understand that you can win the post-goal face off, right? This isn’t football.