holy
Demigod
- May 22, 2017
- 7,157
- 11,127
Elias ain’t Connor, and JT ain’t Leon bru
Am I missing something? They were 18th in goals last year and only added Mikheyev and Lazar. I don't really think they could be considered the deepest. I suppose it's a fairly balanced forward lineup? Is that what OP means?
Nurse was hurt last season, easily a top 2 Dman if healthyFunny how you say they have 1 legit top 4 d and that’s the sole reason they would finish bottom 3 but then have the oilers at #1 who also only have 1 legit top 4 dman. It’s arguable if he’s even a legit top 4 dman if OEL isn’t even one.
Hughes is better with the puck on his stick, but if you played hockey before you would know the smaller the Dman is the easier it is to play against him2 players can only win you so many games. Nurse ain’t hughes, Campbell ain’t Demko if we’re going down this road.
Im not saying the poster is wrong or right for putting the oilers at #1 mate, I’m saying the sole reason said poster used for placing the Canucks bottom 3 applies to the oilers too in an even worse manner. Said poster didn’t disagree the op’s opinion that they have the deepest forward group. So how does the team with the deeper forward group, the better goalie, and the best dman finish bottom 3 compared to its counter part? Do you think mcdrai really make more of an impact over the course of a season?
My personal rankings would be:
Vegas
Calgary
Edmonton
Vancouver
LA
Anaheim
Seattle
SJ
Edmonton got 99 out of their top 2 centers. 108 from top 3. Agree with you there."Miller, Pettersson, Horvat, that’s 90-100 goals alone down the middle. I don’t think there’s any team with that type of scoring punch down the middle."
- Leafs had 110+ goals from their Centres last season.
"Not to mention Boeser having a down year last season due to family reasons. He’s easily good for 25 goals on the wing."
- Meh. Leafs had 35 goal Marner, and 34 goal Nylander on the wings. Many other teams have that too.
"Then you have another 25, potential 30 goal scorer in Mikheyev"
- LMAO at Mikheyev getting anywhere close to 30 goals. Too funny.
"Demko is a top 5 goaltender in the league"
- He's a good one, but Shesterkin, Vasilevsky, Sorokin, Saros, Markstrom, Andersen, Jarry are all better.
"and there’s Hughes and OEL (albeit overpaid) are 2 elite defenseman who make their partners much better than they are"
- LOL @ calling OEL ELITE.
You might need to calm down.
Yeah my buddy the other day asked me who’s a good long shot bet to win Cup and I said Vancouver. They’re a potential cinderella team for sure.I can’t really find any other team aside from St Louis and Colorado that has a more well rounded, balanced and potential threat line up than the Canucks.
Miller, Pettersson, Horvat, that’s 90-100 goals alone down the middle. I don’t think there’s any team with that type of scoring punch down the middle. Not to mention Boeser having a down year last season due to family reasons. He’s easily good for 25 goals on the wing.
Then you have another 25, potential 30 goal scorer in Mikheyev, 50+ playmaker in Garland, Podkolzin who will definitely build from last season potting perhaps another 20-20-40pts. That’s not even mentioning Kuzmenko who could very well be another Panarin type player. Even Pearson is good for 35-40 points including 15-20+ goals.
Demko is a top 5 goaltender in the league, and there’s Hughes and OEL (albeit overpaid) are 2 elite defenseman who make their partners much better than they are (Schenn and Myers).
With the amount of team defense this team has with the additions of Lazar, Mikheyev, Joshua, and even Dickinson, having that hole on the right side is manageable. Canucks were top 5 in the league in fewest even strength goals allowed with that atrocious right side, in large part thanks to OEL and his brains. PK was the main issue on defense but that should be improved.
I just can’t really think of a more well balanced group, especially the forward group, with an average age of 25 years old.
2 players can only win you so many games. Nurse ain’t hughes, Campbell ain’t Demko if we’re going down this road.
Im not saying the poster is wrong or right for putting the oilers at #1 mate, I’m saying the sole reason said poster used for placing the Canucks bottom 3 applies to the oilers too in an even worse manner. Said poster didn’t disagree the op’s opinion that they have the deepest forward group. So how does the team with the deeper forward group, the better goalie, and the best dman finish bottom 3 compared to its counter part? Do you think mcdrai really make more of an impact over the course of a season?
My personal rankings would be:
Vegas
Calgary
Edmonton
Vancouver
LA
Anaheim
Seattle
SJ
I'd argue the top line isn't particularly impressive, but the second and third lines are very potent. 4th line is average.It is actually pretty deep. Weak top 6 though
Only canucks fans think this.
I'd say that's even a bit optimistic.Pump the brakes a bit. The Nucks didn’t even make the playoffs last year in a really weak pacific. They appear to be a lock this year, but it’s entirely plausible they do so as only the 3rd best team in a still very weak division.
Funny how you say they have 1 legit top 4 d and that’s the sole reason they would finish bottom 3 but then have the oilers at #1 who also only have 1 legit top 4 dman. It’s arguable if he’s even a legit top 4 dman if OEL isn’t even one.
An even worse take than the OP?Pacific division will see Vancouver finish bottom 3.
Edmonton
Calgary
Vegas
LA
Ducks
Vancouver
Seattle
SJS
This is how I see that division shaking out. Canucks have some good forwards and a good goalie. But they only have one legitimate top four D man.
Defense sucked a lot less under BB. TG is one of those coaches that made the entire defense look worse than it really isCanucks are definitely an underrated club, as evidence by this thread. Defense sucks, but goaltending and offense are top notch. Plus Bruce B is an amazing coach.