theguardianII
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2020
- 3,706
- 1,870
I think those long term contracts will go the way of the Dodo bird.Yeah. Pettersson with and without an extension are completely different assets. People would be incredibly dissapointed in what he would return without one which would probably be something like Erik Karlsson got the first time but probably without the pick ending up top 5. With an extension, the teams people are suggesting have been Anaheim, Ottawa, and Columbus. He’s not signing in those places if he wants to win.
I think we most likely lose any Pettersson trade. I get talking about trading Pettersson just in case he doesn’t want to resign. I don’t get wanting to trade him because people don’t want to pay him 11-12m and think he is only worth 10m. You just don’t trade away true players in important positions because you might have to slightly overpay them. Plus 12m is probably his market rate now the way contracts are going. The best players are now worth 13-14m instead of 12.
For players with young families they might be favorable but without kids shorter term mean much more money.
Pettersson will be traded.
It will not seem to be a good deal for the Canucks but there are many avenues for it to be a winner for them.
The cap control right off the bat.
The return of assets, picks, prospects and players.
It will be one of the biggest trades this century. Bigger than Tkachuk.
Pettersson will go on to a team that plays for a cup 3 times over the next 6/7 years.
Benning's poison pill will take Hughes, Pettersson and Demko to cure it.
An EP trade might get the team back to a playoff contender within 2 years despite the increasing OEL buyout.
Championship teams are won by defence. That is how to build a team, from the back out. Offence puts bums in seats, defence wins championships.