Ernie
Registered User
- Aug 3, 2004
- 13,597
- 3,718
Five.
So that projects to 22 ES points per year. That's not very good.
Five.
So that projects to 22 ES points per year. That's not very good.
So that projects to 22 ES points per year. That's not very good.
Yes, hockey players are like fine wine, they only get better with age
he's also on pace for 45-46 total points...who cares how he scores.
Sutter is actually having a good offensive year. 4 +6
So that projects to 22 ES points per year. That's not very good.
he's also on pace for 45-46 total points...who cares how he scores.
he's also on pace for 45-46 total points...who cares how he scores.
People should care when a player is getting all that ice-time and yet is producing so little. That's an inefficient player.
I care about the fact that the Canucks have been given 18x60=1080 minutes of ice time and have produced only 38 goals in total which is a goal for every 1.5 periods of hockey.
Blaming Brandon Sutter right now is just scapegoating.
Not at all. When his primary points/60 is so poor, and yet he's getting all that ice-time, he is a part of the problem.
The other part is that Jim Benning built a crappy hockey team.
I care about the fact that the Canucks have been given 18x60=1080 minutes of ice time and have produced only 38 goals in total which is a goal for every 1.5 periods of hockey.
Blaming Brandon Sutter right now is just scapegoating.
Sutter
Eriksson
Gudbranson
Dorsett
Granlund
Baertschi
Biega
Sbisa
Virtanen
Miller
Some solid cap crippling contracts in there and people believe Benning has an eye for talent?!?!? Lol wow
That's a whole lot of garbage acquired through trade, draft and Free agency.
Sutter is finally putting up some points after being placed on the first line. I mean he was one of the reasons we couldn't score when he was centering our 2nd line.
Even now all he is doing is finishing some of the chances the twins are creating and he is not doing jack for them.
Gillis forced Benning to acquire them.
He has no playmaking skills whatsoever and he is a poor 2nd line center because of that. You need a guy to do all the heavy lifting to make that work.Sutter, like Eriksson, like Vrbata need a playmaker to be productive right?
That's who all three of these players are and as a general manager, you'd think Jimbo would know too.
I don't think you're giving Sutter enough credit in the ozone. Because he's much faster than Eriksson, he forces turnovers (and helps maintain puck possession) a lot better because he's fast enough to get to the loose puck / or to tie up the opposing d-man and hold it for the overload until the one of the Sedins can finesse the puck out of the scrum and dump it back into the corner or to a d-man.
He has no playmaking skills whatsoever and he is a poor 2nd line center because of that. You need a guy to do all the heavy lifting to make that work.
Give it a couple games more and the teams will learn that if they focus on the twins, Sutter will be useless because he doesn't really do ****. Let him have the puck, what is he going to do? Create offense by himself?
Basically he was penned in as a center for this team and whatever line he plays on as a center, he kills the offense for that line. Now the coaching staff has resort to turning him into a winger to make minimize his offense killings effect.
I care about the fact that the Canucks have been given 18x60=1080 minutes of ice time and have produced only 38 goals in total which is a goal for every 1.5 periods of hockey.
Blaming Brandon Sutter right now is just scapegoating.
That in itself isn't necessarily fatal.No playmaking ability at all.
That in itself isn't necessarily fatal.
Problem is, we don't have alot of "playmaking forwards" - course Benning knew that before he went for Sutter.
That's the whole point. You not only have a finite supply of assets but some of them are also rapidly depreciating. This management group has taken so many stupid gambles and the problem with that is that those assets are never coming back. The only way to get more is to get lucky in the later rounds of the draft and to sign free agents, but looking at Loui's contract and the failure to move expiring contracts here it doesn't seem plausible that we'll be gaining assets anytime soon.The interesting thing here is that not everyone agrees that this is the best way to re-tool... There has been support for Benning's method of Packaging picks + futures for mid-aged players. Also, an aversion to cycling vets per possession metrics.
It's interesting to me that posters can be so divergent on how to re-tool, given the fact that every GM has a limited amount of resources with which to re-tool.
Gillis forced his hand. It was impossible for him to get anything for Kesler. Or after for a Bonino. It was the owners that drafted Virtanen and made them extend Sbisa. And Aquilini traded for Dorsett.
All this could be avoided if Benning was allowed to update his black board daily. He's got an eye for talent. He saw something special in Sbisa.
Poor guy. He was forced to give away McCann and a high 2nd round pick to Florida or they said he wouldn't be allowed to eat Fish crackers anymore.Don't forget Willie forcing Benning to sign Vey and Etem. Poor Benning not getting the chance to build his team without all these roadblocks.
Medhat mafia member Linden forced Willie on him and now won't let him fire Willie.Don't forget Willie forcing Benning to sign Vey and Etem. Poor Benning not getting the chance to build his team without all these roadblocks.