Yes.Were the rumours of him being moved to the Hurricanes at the deadline last season legit?
Yes.Were the rumours of him being moved to the Hurricanes at the deadline last season legit?
Petterson for Fox+?
Similar things were Said about Eichel. Sometimes, it s more about the Environment than the player himself …Pettersson is so hilariously overrated. Forget about his age. Forget about flashes of potential you may have seen 5 years ago. He’s paid 11.6M (!), being mopey and disappearing for a month shouldn’t be in his profile. You should expect PPG++ with that price tag too. And a leader that drives his team, not just be a sad faced passenger.
Hah. Not by me. Eichel was a more complete player than Matthews even in his Buffalo days and I stand by that. It’s not the same story for Pettersson though. And Pettersson has had nowhere near as dire of an environment than Buffalo. So banking on some Eichel like resurgence? Yeh not happening.VAN should not do this, it would be similar to SJS trading for Karlsson while having Burns. Fox s impact will decrease by not playing PP1, and Hughes will have less offensive impact / starts.
Similar things were Said about Eichel. Sometimes, it s more about the Environment than the player himself …
So Necas, a buyout bait, a meh prospect and a late 1st for a star 1c? How does that help Vancouver at all?Their original offer was Necas, Kotkaniemi, significant prospect rumored to be Scott Morrow or Felix Unger Sorum, and a 1st, and it almost worked. If the Canes are bold, they'll offer it again even with Necas's amazing start to the year.
That’s not what I would call a ringing endorsement.
Peterka + Byram
We need to sweeten the deal with a guy like Lafferty.Power one-for-one.
Let's not forget, Canucks nearly traded EP40 right before the extension.
Nah, I would do Dahlin thoPower one-for-one.
It's obviously Cozens & Byram as a start, and I'd rather have tage for whatever modifications need be made.Peterka + Byram
Yeah man u right he's not, all an illusion cool maybe go find an oilers thread instead..?Allvin saying Petey “could and should be” a number 1 Center. Implies and admits that he’s not, no?
I would do this for JT Miller, but not Petey.Peterka + Byram
No interest in Miller.I would do this for JT Miller, but not Petey.
Dream on, Dahlin's not going anywhere.Nah, I would do Dahlin tho
Fair and Fair.No interest in Miller.
Dream on, Dahlin's not going anywhere.
"Sir Allvin, would you like some poop with your tea?"We need to sweeten the deal with a guy like Lafferty.
But surprisingly it seems he was good for them."Sir Allvin, would you like some poop with your tea?"
Where there's smoke there's fire. So there's something going on there and Miller seems to be a part of it. It's not that I'm against Miller as a player, of course he would help us a lot in that regard, but I don't want to risk getting some kind of cancer in the locker room by trading two good young players for a 31/32 year old guy.But Miller intensity and a true #1 Center for Buffalo would be huge for that team.
The locker room shit is overrated, media in Vancouver just makes things worse than they are.
Fair enough, but how often do 100 Point Power forward Centers become available on the Market?But surprisingly it seems he was good for them.
Where there's smoke there's fire. So there's something going on there and Miller seems to be a part of it. It's not that I'm against Miller as a player, of course he would help us a lot in that regard, but I don't want to risk getting some kind of cancer in the locker room by trading two good young players for a 31/32 year old guy.
Miller is one hell of a playerBut surprisingly it seems he was good for them.
Where there's smoke there's fire. So there's something going on there and Miller seems to be a part of it. It's not that I'm against Miller as a player, of course he would help us a lot in that regard, but I don't want to risk getting some kind of cancer in the locker room by trading two good young players for a 31/32 year old guy.