rypper
21-12-05 it's finally over.
- Dec 22, 2006
- 17,181
- 21,986
Pennsylvania.I don't believe for a second J.T. loses anything from last season to this. Does he live here in the offseason, anyone?
Pennsylvania.I don't believe for a second J.T. loses anything from last season to this. Does he live here in the offseason, anyone?
I don't believe for a second J.T. loses anything from last season to this. Does he live here in the offseason, anyone?
Fair.I don't think we'll notice much drop in play for JT at all, but both he and Brock are not going to be shooting 19% this year so we should expect a drop if numbers. Hope I'm wrong thoug
I don't believe for a second J.T. loses anything from last season to this. Does he live here in the offseason, anyone?
Then how the f*** do ya stalk them?No clue, but I'm not exactly keeping tabs on everyone's offseason exploits.
Then how the f*** do ya stalk them?
Figure out a stacked unit and play them for the whole thing like EDMI wonder what the plan is for PP2 this year.
Who's taking the faceoffs for that unit?
Garland, Sprong, Suter, Hronek. Who's the 5th? Are we scoring a ton?
A lot resting on Pettersson getting his shot & confidence back as well as DeBrusk being the perfect 5th man.Figure out a stacked unit and play them for the whole thing like EDM
I don't think it should be a question. We know blueger worked with Joshua and Garland, and it allows them to play higher leverage minutes if Blueger is the one centering.Only questions I have are how the Suter/Blueger battle works out in camp for 3C, and what the depth chart looks like the on the right-side defense. Everything else looks pretty set, outside obviously the goaltending uncertainly, but that's not really a line-up issue, more an organizational depth issue.
I expect Hoglander/Sprong to basically be rotational depending on what's going on at the time.
I don't think it should be a question. We know blueger worked with Joshua and Garland, and it allows them to play higher leverage minutes if Blueger is the one centering.
Hoglander - Suter -Lafferty was a very good line early in the season for us.
If you're taking Hoglander out for Sprong and Lafferty out for Sherwood, there's some similarities there and I think that line is going to demolish other teams fourth lines offensively. It just may not be a typical "physical" fourth line.
I see this as the most likely line-up if no other moves are made before training camp. Hoglander and Sprong will interchange depending on how training camp goes. Debrusk and Heinen may interchange. I all depends on chemistry.Hogs - Petey - Debrusk
Heinen - Miller - Boeser
Joshua - Blueger - Garland
Sprong - Suter - Sherwood
PDG, Aman
Hughes - Hronek
Soucy - Myers
Forbert - Desharnais
Juulsen
i think pettersson is getting debrusk and heinen to start with suter (or pdg) playing with miller and boeser. i do think if they don't click immediately tho there's a good chance debrusk will end up with miller and boeser as the defacto first line with pettersson playing with a rotating cast of misfits again
i think they should try miller or pettersson between joshua and garland with boeser and debrusk with whoever is left over and then a heinen - suter - hoglander/sherwood/sprong line as the 3rd. that would give them the most offensive depth imo but they seem to really not like garland with either miller or pettersson. the 4th line would be bad tho with some arrangement of blueger, aman, sherwood, sprong, hoglander and pdg
Garland was good with Pettersson last year and now they have Joshua signed with term. I also think they should explore it, especially given that I think DeBrusk might be fun with Miller.i think pettersson is getting debrusk and heinen to start with suter (or pdg) playing with miller and boeser. i do think if they don't click immediately tho there's a good chance debrusk will end up with miller and boeser as the defacto first line with pettersson playing with a rotating cast of misfits again
i think they should try miller or pettersson between joshua and garland with boeser and debrusk with whoever is left over and then a heinen - suter - hoglander/sherwood/sprong line as the 3rd. that would give them the most offensive depth imo but they seem to really not like garland with either miller or pettersson. the 4th line would be bad tho with some arrangement of blueger, aman, sherwood, sprong, hoglander and pdg
Figure out a stacked unit and play them for the whole thing like EDM