Confirmed with Link: Canes Sign Defenseman Jake Gardiner to 4 Year Contract

Srsly

Registered User
Feb 8, 2011
2,511
978
Upland
So according to that TheHockeyGuy dude on the Youtube, Montreal offered Gardiner 3 years, $15.75 million.
Would it really be that surprising he wouldn’t want to play in another Canadian hockey market? The guy was a media scapegoat who got death threats sent his way every time he made a Twitter post. If I were him I’d definitely go to Carolina before returning to Toronto or Montreal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vagrant

Roboturner913

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
25,853
55,526
Would it really be that surprising he wouldn’t want to play in another Canadian hockey market? The guy was a media scapegoat who got death threats sent his way every time he made a Twitter post. If I were him I’d definitely go to Carolina before returning to Toronto or Montreal.

Oh, I totally agree. It's just fun piling on Montreal at this point
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,498
92,978
Would it really be that surprising he wouldn’t want to play in another Canadian hockey market? The guy was a media scapegoat who got death threats sent his way every time he made a Twitter post. If I were him I’d definitely go to Carolina before returning to Toronto or Montreal.
If you were a FA looking to win, would you want to play for Montreal or Carolina right now?

If you were a top end defensive FA looking for your best fit, would you rather be inserted into the Montreal defensive lines or the Carolina defensive lines?

The biggest nut punch of all of this is that... yeah, there are actual legitimate hockey reasons why a good player would choose Carolina over Montreal right now. And that fact really, reeeeeaaaally pisses them off
 

Canes

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
25,204
70,077
An Oblate Spheroid
Would it really be that surprising he wouldn’t want to play in another Canadian hockey market? The guy was a media scapegoat who got death threats sent his way every time he made a Twitter post. If I were him I’d definitely go to Carolina before returning to Toronto or Montreal.
Well that and he still is guaranteed more money overall, then there are things like not having to pay Canadian income tax or Quebec provincial tax which would probably be the highest in the league.
 

Navin R Slavin

Fifth line center
Jan 1, 2011
16,369
64,800
Durrm NC
Oh, hey! That brings up an interesting question: if you sign a full NTC for Team A, and then waive to be traded to Team B, can you still be traded back to Team A?
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,330
102,073
Oh, hey! That brings up an interesting question: if you sign a full NTC for Team A, and then waive to be traded to Team B, can you still be traded back to Team A?

I would think that if they sign the addendum to keep the NTC in place after the trade (which they always do), then you couldn't be traded back to Team A unless you waive it for them, since the NTC is now in effect with team B after the trade. Of course, I'm not @Lempo so take it with a huge grain of salt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bunch of Jurcos

Cardiac Jerks

Asinine & immoral
Jan 13, 2006
23,555
40,650
Long Sault, Ontario
Well that and he still is guaranteed more money overall, then there are things like not having to pay Canadian income tax or Quebec provincial tax which would probably be the highest in the league.

Can confirm Quebec taxes are brutal. Paid them all last year but thank god we file based off where we live and not where we work.
 

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Feb 23, 2014
27,714
86,664
I would think that if they sign the addendum to keep the NTC in place after the trade (which they always do), then you couldn't be traded back to Team A unless you waive it for them, since the NTC is now in effect with team B after the trade. Of course, I'm not @Lempo so take it with a huge grain of salt.
This would be my understanding.

The addendum thingy seems to be some kind of later evolutionary development; it's not really described in the CBA, so it's hard to be absolutely certain of matters regarding it.

CBA 11.8 says only this:

"An acquiring Club may agree to continue to be bound by the no-Trade or no-move clause, which agreement shall be evidenced in writing to the Player, Central Registry and the NHLPA, in accordance with Exhibit 3 hereof."

And even that is very confusingly said after they state that the acquiring Club is not bound by a clause that hasn't yet gone effective at the time of the transfer. So the UFA way of keeping the clause in effect through a trade made possibly by one-time waiving may be a creative development.

This is why they all are lawyers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Boom Boom Apathy

Bunch of Jurcos

The poster formally known as Hedley
Feb 24, 2016
3,746
15,780
I would think that if they sign the addendum to keep the NTC in place after the trade (which they always do), then you couldn't be traded back to Team A unless you waive it for them, since the NTC is now in effect with team B after the trade. Of course, I'm not @Lempo so take it with a huge grain of salt.

Unfortunately we can't all be @Lempo. The world would be a much better and funnier place.
 

Canes

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
25,204
70,077
An Oblate Spheroid
First look at Jake in a canes sweater

Now all he needs is to grow a mustache

300.parks.rec.lc.051611.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: AD Skinner

Znith

Registered User
Aug 16, 2012
412
70
Hardcore leafs fan here, take care of Gards for us.
He was much maligned by the older "bUt He dOesN't hIt" fans and media here, and primarily a scapegoat for making a few playoff mistakes, but Gardiner can flat out play. He is a great skater and possession driver, can make great tape to tape passes, excellent at zone entries, and has a pretty underrated wrist shot when he wheels into the offensive zone.
All we hear from other players is that they love him in the room too.

His downsides would be: not very physical, high risk/reward with the puck in his own zone that can lead to either a 100ft breakaway pass or sending a pizza up the middle, and sometimes his gap control isn't the greatest at preventing zone entries.

But, you have to remember that he was saddled with the likes of Nikita Zaitsev, Roman Polak, etc. for most of his time on the leafs. For some reason Babs refused to try him on the right side with Rielly even though playing random minutes together they looked great. Pairing him with a steady player like Pesce will be a really good pairing imo.

Really wish we could have offered him $4m, it's a steal, as long as that back issue from the playoffs healed up.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad