Seravalli: Canes discussing long term deal with Kotkaniemi, Canes want 8 years

Status
Not open for further replies.

3074326

Registered User
Apr 9, 2009
11,746
11,358
USA
I mean.. He's 21 years old putting up respectable numbers. Way too soon to be writing him off.

Where was he written off in that post? The poster simply said he wasn’t worth an 8 year contract at $4M/year.
 

Foppberg

Registered User
Nov 20, 2016
24,268
26,789
Summerside, PEI
Where was he written off in that post? The poster simply said he wasn’t worth an 8 year contract at $4M/year.
He said the Canes will be stuck with that contract as he's not a 4M dollar player and too inconsistent. As if the player he is today will be the same player he is at 25+

AKA writing him off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stubu

Not The One

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
3,206
1,650
Montréal, Qc.
Canes aren't rolling with KK as Trochek's replacement and hope to compete. If KK is a 2C, its on a weak NHL team that is unlikely to be competing. Canes aren't that.

At this stage, Staal is taking up a potential spot for KK as the 3C.

Trade / dump Staal with a sweetener?

What?

NHL Stats

So they are going to "grooming" KK to replace a guy who's played 129 minutes of PK this year with another one who they played... 19 seconds on the PK?

NHL Stats

They are also preparing KK to take over from Staal and his 881 faceoffs (most on the Canes) taken by having him take 255 faceoffs (fifth on their team)?

LOL. This ain't a video game.
 

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,577
6,418
I mean.. He's 21 years old putting up respectable numbers. Way too soon to be writing him off.
Another way you could look at it is that he hasn’t improved any aspect of his game 4 years into his NHL career. He’s the exact same player from 4 years ago. He’s going to be a career 3rd liner - at best.
 

Rene Saari

Registered User
May 30, 2016
194
58
If it is 8 years, it will be 6 million per year. Likely to crack 40 pts next year, 50 after that. It`ll be bargain between years 3-8.
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,665
11,216
YIKES! Players like JK are not the ones you build around on long term deals like this. Unless he is signing for 8 years X 3 million per or something. He has 22 pts in 52 games, which is nothing great. That is replaceable player level.
 

Rene Saari

Registered User
May 30, 2016
194
58
YIKES! Players like JK are not the ones you build around on long term deals like this. Unless he is signing for 8 years X 3 million per or something. He has 22 pts in 52 games, which is nothing great. That is replaceable player level.
Yes, and already at 21 years of age!! Get a grip. Btw, speaking of points, how much Caufield has? I tell you, he has ”replaceable” amount of pts.
 

Ainec

Panetta was not racist
Jun 20, 2009
21,784
6,431
can't think of a luckier nhler than kotkaniemi

gets overpaid bigtime on a RFA contract of all things

goes to a team that clearly respects him and his potential and giving him prime opportunities to develop

now gets an eight year deal
 

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,577
6,418
He is still young but for his age and minutes ranks well if u compare to many stars. He has more grit and i think he does less mistakes. I just dont get the constant bashing just because you guys lost him. Or would u really have dvorak instead of him long term?
I’ve been “bashing” him long before he ever went to CAR because he sucks. He’s always been somewhat gritty in that he isn’t afraid to lay the body - when he feels like it, i.e., when he isn’t sulking, or thinking he’s a superstar talent. I wouldn’t call that an improvement. He seems to make mistakes just as often as he did; he just plays sheltered minutes on a better team now. That’s probably the extent of the “improvement”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Samhockey3

Chan790

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
4,051
2,737
Bingy town, NY
As a Canes fan, this doesn't make me happy. I've been thoroughly unimpressed in JK. We took a chance at a cost that worked for us, no harm in that...it didn't work.

I'm rather more in favor of not tendering him an offer at all and letting him walk as a UFA. No point in chasing wasted assets with more assets...I'd rather have the cap space and roster spot than JK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,823
As a Canes fan, this doesn't make me happy. I've been thoroughly unimpressed in JK. We took a chance at a cost that worked for us, no harm in that...it didn't work.

I'm rather more in favor of not tendering him an offer at all and letting him walk as a UFA. No point in chasing wasted assets with more assets...I'd rather have the cap space and roster spot than JK.
This is a smart take imo. Took a gamble and it didn’t pan out. Cut your losses and improve the roster in other ways rather than trying to shove a square peg in a round hole.
 

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,528
39,883
What?

NHL Stats

So they are going to "grooming" KK to replace a guy who's played 129 minutes of PK this year with another one who they played... 19 seconds on the PK?

NHL Stats

They are also preparing KK to take over from Staal and his 881 faceoffs (most on the Canes) taken by having him take 255 faceoffs (fifth on their team)?

LOL. This ain't a video game.

They are trying to win the Stanley Cup so they are using their current best players on the PK and face offs, not trying to exclusively develop this one player.
 

japhi

Registered User
Jul 7, 2014
3,778
3,131
Carolina has openings in their midd6 with Trocheck and Staal and Carolina is a top tier in this league with lots of Finns on the roster

They could run next year with
Aho
Kotka
Staal(match up line)
in the middle which leaves plenty of good wingers for Kotka.

Svec, Necas, Jarvis, TT for example

KK is going to improve and round out as a player but he needs to improve his skating significantly if he wants to run with top 6 talent. While in theory he could replace Trocheck's production, it could come at the cost of his linemates. Don't think it's a coincidence that he has produced better in that 4th line role, he doesn't have top 6 pace.

Habs fans know this story, Galchenyuk ultimately failed as an NHL'r because of his skating. KK will have a far better career then Galch but the league is so fast, will be interesting to see if he can get quicker over the summer.
 

Mac Attack

Beefy Legs
Aug 15, 2018
1,275
853
It would need to be more enticing than stringing along $6.1 mil 1 year deals for the next several years.
Yep and it's not like this guy is ever likely to earn a star level contract so he should do whatever he can to maximize earnings now. If he ended up free agent cuz canes wouldn't do his minimum then someone would overpay for someone as young as him with draft pedigree.
 

Unbiased Fan

Registered User
May 24, 2019
3,803
1,803
Giving Kotkaniemi an 8 year deal with what he has shown so far in the NHL would be bizarre. But maybe I'm just more conservative with who I want to give out long term contracts to.
Personally I like the idea of long term contracts given to players pre breakout to minimize cap hits. That’s how you get players at extremely cheap cap hits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeProspector

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
I mean.. He's 21 years old putting up respectable numbers. Way too soon to be writing him off.

I think he will be a decent middle 2C once he matures. This if the funny part though... there is no way we get that reply from you and others if he was with the Habs still.

Decent numbers? Not that much different that what he did last year for the Habs. 20/56 vs 22/52 but a little more goals playing on a much better team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
Personally I like the idea of long term contracts given to players pre breakout to minimize cap hits. That’s how you get players at extremely cheap cap hits.

You are correct but you are then hoping that the breakout happens. It's a gamble either way when you consider short term vs long term. This kid was drafted as a long term prospect so if you believe in him, go for the long term deal. I do think he will improve more yet still but how much is guess work. Not even KK knows that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unbiased Fan

Prairie Habs

Registered User
Oct 3, 2010
12,268
13,418
As a Canes fan, this doesn't make me happy. I've been thoroughly unimpressed in JK. We took a chance at a cost that worked for us, no harm in that...it didn't work.

I'm rather more in favor of not tendering him an offer at all and letting him walk as a UFA. No point in chasing wasted assets with more assets...I'd rather have the cap space and roster spot than JK.

So if you are treating him like a rental anyway would you look to move him for a rental that is a better fit? The acquiring team would have to be willing to give him a contract that is more enticing than his QO, so probably a team like Arizona or Seattle that has a bunch of room and should be taking chances on young guys like him.

Kessel would be the obvious one if you are looking to trade a developing scorer for a proven scorer, but Canes don't really need a right wing. Crouse would probably be the most interesting target as he is scoring at a similar pace to KK, but he is better suited to lower lines, much cheaper, and RFA without a huge QO.

On Seattle Gio is the big UFA, but again Canes don't really need a LD. Jared McCann would be the best target for the Canes, but Seattle is unlikely to move him. You would probably move him for futures then flip those futures to a different team in that case.
 

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,852
23,528
Nova Scotia
Visit site
I think he will be a decent middle 2C once he matures. This if the funny part though... there is no way we get that reply from you and others if he was with the Habs still.

Decent numbers? Not that much different that what he did last year for the Habs. 20/56 vs 22/52 but a little more goals playing on a much better team.
Hard not to come back to the fact, he is still just 21.
His fourth year in the league..........yes he should never had been put in the league so soon, by the habs, but the kid is still just that............still thinking he coul be a 45-55 pt producing 2-3 C in the league.....
As for the contract, 8 years seems a stretch....more like 5-6 years would make more sense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Halifax
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad