- Jun 24, 2012
- 86,609
- 161,679
Looking like you have a good feeling about this one.Maybe there is another Davey D lurking in the shadows...
Looking like you have a good feeling about this one.Maybe there is another Davey D lurking in the shadows...
If we stay at 5 and Michkov is the one left, and we don't take him... Gorton/Hughes are going to derail their positive movement with our youth rebuild because "not taking Michkov" will haunt them for years. A distraction that lasts for 5+ years.
Yeah, Michkov could not come or disappoint but who's really going to bet a lot of money he won't sign in the NHL after his KHL deal and he's a disappointing prospect? Who's betting big money on that? I wouldn't
As far as Michkov telling teams who he will have an interview with.... Has there been a report saying he told the Habs he wouldn't? Didn't notice any
He just has to say he is a "female lion" and then Bobrov will cry of joy and give him his first born.Habs will list Michkov as a no-draft because they won't like his answer to which animal he would be
The talk about it being a generational draft is bullshit.Top 5 pick in a "generational" draft demands you pick the most skilled player, period, end of conversation. Size makes no difference to me in this scenario as long as the skill level is so significantly higher than the next guy. You can play him on a thick line to create space. Some of the best players in the league are under 6'. Skill is rare, size can easily be acquired and for cheap.
The talk about it being a generational draft is bullshit.
There is Bedard but the rest is like any other draft.
The 2022 draft was at some point a generational draft because of Wright and Lambert and not even a year later its apparently a f***ing weak draft.
It could be a generational draft and we could whiff our pick or it could be a very weak draft and we end up with Forsberg. Those notion are irrelevant and are nothing but noise.
Nail the pick and thats it.
I know the popular opinion is that Slafkovsky would have been picked 17th in the 2023 NHL entry draft but i firmly believe that Carlsson, Fantilli, Smith, Michkov, Slafkovsky, Cooley and Wright belongs in the same discussion.Yeah… no.
Carlsson, Fantilli, Smith, and Michkov all being available in the top-5 is an anomaly. The quality of the top-25/30 is just about unparalleled compared to the last decade.
We don’t know how it’ll all turn out until they’re in the NHL, but there’s no question that this draft year is exceptional.
It's just plain stupid. Not because you could ice 20 5'8''. You can't. But thank god nobody said this when it was time to pick Caufield....we would have ended up with John Beecher....Especially after saying during the combine that ultimately we will take the most talented player available. If they won't take Michkov @ 5 (and I don't think they will) I'd say there could be a case made for Benson being arguably the most talented player left on the board @ 5 for the Habs.
I was listening to Carbo being interviewed on TSN690 last week and when asked about what he thinks the Habs should do at the draft the first thing out of his mouth was the Habs need size since you can't have too many smaller players on your team since they already have a few. Yes the Habs might need more size but this team also really needs talent.
Personnally, I'd have no problem with either of them. If it's not Michkov, it's one or the other for me.I don't think anyone can definitively say Benson is outright more talented than Ryan Leonard.. and then you factor in the better frame and skating.. I can definitely see Leonard going ahead of Benson in a BPA on talent.
I know the popular opinion is that Slafkovsky would have been picked 17th in the 2023 NHL entry draft but i firmly believe that Carlsson, Fantilli, Smith, Michkov, Slafkovsky, Cooley and Wright belongs in the same discussion.
Therefore, i think after Bedard its like any other draft.
You are making good point but its debatable, i believe.(i insist on debatable)No. It’s a bad take. If you follow the draft closely through the years and analyze these kids based on watching their play and not on fun draft-time narratives, it’s obvious and pretty well unanimous.
We knew it was a weak crop by the end of the Slaf/Wright year, even leading up to it. Very few players stood out, none appearing exceptional after Wright was injured/sick and ultimately plateaued. Slafkovsky showed something special at the Olympics, but most could put that into context.
Bedard, Fantilli, Carlsson, Smith, and Michkov are at the absolute peak of what we typically see from prospects in these leagues. Name an equivalent to Fantilli last year in the NCAA? In the last five years? Was it luck that Michkov dominated last years U18s while not being in his draft year? Had the best season for a Russian player since Ovechkin? Carlsson is having the best season for a draft eligible player in the SHL in many years. Smith is breaking USNTDP records and dominating international play… No matter how you look at it, this top-5 is special compared to other years and there isn’t a huge drop off either.
For those that follow prospects closely, you’ll hear a nearly unanimous agreement that this is a special year. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s just a good draft year.
I disagree. The quality of picks in this draft is much higher than last year and past drafts. Solid picks going into the 2nd round. None the less. You’re right. Just make the right pick!The talk about it being a generational draft is bullshit.
There is Bedard but the rest is like any other draft.
The 2022 draft was at some point a generational draft because of Wright and Lambert and not even a year later its apparently a f***ing weak draft.
It could be a generational draft and we could whiff our pick or it could be a very weak draft and we end up with Forsberg. Those notion are irrelevant and are nothing but noise.
Nail the pick and thats it.
We’re not going to know for some 3 years if Michkov or most other draftees have an NHL impact, so the GM has 3 other drafts in which to manufacture hope.There's no denying, that despite the risks that may be associated with Michkov, if we end up passing on him, it will indeed be a very tough pill to swallow.
There's a huge possibilty, or more so probability, it bites us in the ass.
We’re not going to know for some 3 years if Michkov or most other draftees have an NHL impact, so the GM has 3 other drafts in which to manufacture hope.
Who knows if this management contingent will even be around as is by the time Michkov supposedly becomes available to the NHL.
I dont disagree, but we almost picked Lane Hutson in the third round. For what its worth.I disagree. The quality of picks in this draft is much higher than last year and past drafts. Solid picks going into the 2nd round. None the less. You’re right. Just make the right pick!
This management group in Montreal gives me more hope and optimism than the bargainbin management group. What a disaster that was !! He put us back 10 years.We’re not going to know for some 3 years if Michkov or most other draftees have an NHL impact, so the GM has 3 other drafts in which to manufacture hope.
Who knows if this management contingent will even be around as is by the time Michkov supposedly becomes available to the NHL.
This “you’ll see” bit had all the ominous overtones of a Russian spy agency communique:
“Michkov will go to Washington, you’ll see,” the source told Match TVand translated via Google Translate. “The Capitals will definitely take him – there is only one competitor for [them], San Jose,
who will make the fourth choice. Because, the owner of the club loves Russian hockey very much, and he is a fan of Igor Larionov.
Yeah I could understand but that's not 100% ethic. This nhl league have Arizona as a franchise, one of the 32. They are the poorest and most miserable of the league, the crowd is something like 2500, it's a joke. Midget 3A in Qc or junior across Canada and Minnesota brings more crowd. But Arz are in the nhl so it's better play the system, accept to play there. If later he ask for a trade, he have to accept the PLD treatment and swallow the pill in silence.If I was in Michkov’s shoes, I’d try very hard not to play in Arz too.
lol
Just a brief mention: “It is hard to imagine that Montreal (fifth overall) will take the Russian,” the source started.Did they mention Montreal ?
Another 3rd liner exactly what we needDvorsky may be the safe pick
Can you agree nothing is done yet, we are not in 2026 and Mitchkov is only a projected player. He can bust, he might never come, he can be half-bust, he can be 80% what you expect and 100% what you expect. Same for everyone except the others don't have the geopolitical context. The media environment could be a distraction for Mitch. As a public person, he will have to answer questions about the war?I guess you are willing to bet guys from 6-10 will be better than Michkov?