Jack Skellington
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 1,487
- 2,836
Whose father worked at the hatchery?I don’t think “out of an egg” is part of the saying
Whose father worked at the hatchery?I don’t think “out of an egg” is part of the saying
How does a poster say I'm 80% sure Columbus picks Carlsson over Smith and 70% sure Grier takes Michkov over Smith?
It's just putting a number on one's sense of the chances.
These two words don't work together. Michkov is 3 years away from NHL.... at least.Salf, Dach, Dubois, and Suzuki who's thick and durable would be the other 4 top 6 forwards at the moment...
Caufield - Suzuki - Dubois
Michkov - Dach - Slaf
I still doubt Hughes will select Michkov.If Jackets pick Carlsson, Ill be hoping San Jose takes Smith, so we get a chance at Michkov.
eh, no.These two words don't work together. Michkov is 3 years away from NHL.... at least.
Anderson should still be considered as a top-six unless RHP or Farrell show otherwise.
I still doubt Hughes will select Michkov.
He could trade pick #5 + Harris for Dubois and Jet's own #1 pick.
These two words don't work together. Michkov is 3 years away from NHL.... at least.
Anderson should still be considered as a top-six unless RHP or Farrell show otherwise.
Yea no thxThese two words don't work together. Michkov is 3 years away from NHL.... at least.
Anderson should still be considered as a top-six unless RHP or Farrell show otherwise.
I still doubt Hughes will select Michkov.
He could trade pick #5 + Harris for Dubois and Jet's own #1 pick (#18).
How does a poster say I'm 80% sure Columbus picks Carlsson over Smith and 70% sure Grier takes Michkov over Smith?
It's just putting a number on one's sense of the chances.
Actually I've seen a few posters post about percentages of who goes where. I don't see anything wrong with doing so.
Absolutely! Up until the point when in a year or two he busts - and then I reserve the right to whine and complain ceaselessly...Would you guys be satisfied with Smith?
I'm warming up to the idea, but still hoping we can use our deep prispect pool and or late 1st to trade up and get one of Carlsson or Michkov. Though SJ and Columbus both might not want to do that.Would you guys be satisfied with Smith?
If we pick Smith, he could be really good with Suzuki and Caufield. Then we have a power line of Slaf-Dach-Dubois:
Caufiled - Suzuki - Smith
Slaf - Dach - Dubois
He is the guy i want.Would you guys be satisfied with Smith?
Do you have any worries Smith becomes Alex Turcotte or Jonathan Drouin?That's a good review
He's not my favorite and he's not in the same tier then the top 4 for me but I can't say I would't be satisfied with him. Good chance he become our #1 player in PTS.Would you guys be satisfied with Smith?
Would you guys be satisfied with Smith?
No not at all, I'm pretty confident he's gonna be a good player. I just don't think he's gonna be the player you want to build your team around, but more the #2-3 of your team.Do you have any worries Smith becomes Alex Turcotte or Jonathan Drouin?
Would you guys be satisfied with Smith?
It’s good because we already have other players to pair him with. He won’t be alone and the only player asked to produce. He will bring our offense to another level.No not at all, I'm pretty confident he's gonna be a good player. I just don't think he's gonna be the player you want to build your team around, but more the #2-3 of your team.
Would you guys be satisfied with Smith?
I think he has the assets but he’s going to find the cost too prohibitive.HABS will stay picking 5
they will not move up. Kent does not have enough horses to make that deal
pick 5 , get a guy and that is that
They will take Leonard if not Smith. I’m pretty sure.It's very likely whoever is left between Smith and Michkov.
But as we all know it isn't like Hughes is saying things the Hawks and Sharks org have said. Possibly to our detriment that we would pass if Smith goes top 4.
If you don't take Michkov, who else has a profile that's special?
I come to two names.
David Reinbacher & Matthew Wood.
Reinbacher point production in the Swiss league for a draft eligible is unheard of. That's special production. We see on the ice the tools match.
Matthew Wood, we know the feet, but everything else is special. One of the best u17 seasons in BCHL history. One of the best u18 seasons in the NCAA. One of the best U18s for Canada.
I'd say the 3rd would be Dvorsky, more for what he did as a D-1. But his production in the J20 was also pretty substantial. The allsvenskan numbers are what casts doubt and puts him at the 3 spot of the group.