Hannibal
Fear the Weber
- Feb 11, 2007
- 11,377
- 9,280
Button is the only person in the world who thinks this.
Button is the hot take king.
He's a solid option in the top 15, but top 5 is laughable.ASP banked a couple pucks off in people's asses during the Canada game and now he's Sergei Zubov.
Just an awful take.
He's a solid option in the top 15, but top 5 is laughable.
If you mean that
Gallagher ( injury prone )
Armia ( injury prone )
Edmunson ( injury prone )
Savard ( injury prone )
Allen ( injury prone )
Hoffman ( just prone )
Guhle ( injury prone )
Slafkovsky ( injury prone, rookie )
Caufield ( injury prone , major surgery )
Xhekaj ( major surgery )
Dach ( injury prone, major surgery, concussions )
Montembault ( Swiss cheese )
Barron ( rookie )
Are all going to magically have career years than yes, we should have a top 15 pick.
LaP-McJesus-DAChampion would be an adequate first line providing the depth behind it is quality.Mitchkov is coming to the NHL in three years.
Connor McDavid will be a UFA in three years.
I think that Slafkovsky - McDavid - Mitchkov would be an adequate first line for the Habs.
Plus the two of us can get paid as that's about when Gallagher's contract is running out.LaP-McJesus-DAChampion would be an adequate first line providing the depth behind it is quality.
I'd be more worried about the west having a slew of horrible teams.
Here are the teams I think that will finish lower than us:
Coyotes
Blackhawks
Ducks
Sharks
Blue Jackets
Flyers
Here are the teams I think we will be around the same tier with:
Penguins (They're getting old and on the brink of rebuild)
Capitals (Ditto)
Flames (Not impressed with their team at all, but could rebound)
Blues
Canucks
I could probably add a few more in this last tier as well.
I think the Leafs might trade Matthews or Marner, which might mean something for our draft. I tried to start this discussion before, but now more convinced than ever that it's possible.
These are all Matthews scenarios because I don't think Marner's trade makes sense for a rebuilding team like Matthews does. Historically, franchise players like Matthews, go for at least 1 prime prospect, 1 top 5 draft pick + at least 1st, plus some active players going the other way - I didn't include the active player part there because this could make a 3 team trade etc. so there are too many variables (one of the variables is that the Habs could be in there in some ways).
First, my reflex was to look at Arizona with Cooley/6th/12th - I still think it's the biggest possibility.
But Colombus and Sharks could also be in the mix for different reasons. Colombus just need a 1st C and they are rebooted; they are not your typical rebuild team, why wait 3-4 years for one of the draftees to arrive for Gaudreau/Laine. Jiricek, 3rd and Kings 1st. Sharks with a Bystedt/4th/Devils 1st. Sharks with Matthews are not a terrible team.
If the Leafs pick ahead of us, I think it's more likely we'll face the Michkov decision, as Leafs would be likely to pick centers to replace Matthews and Tavares.
Why would the Leafs do this? It's a quick fix to a lot of their issues.
Trade with Arizona
Tavares - Trade with 12th overall for a C (PLD?) - Marner
Knies - Cooley - Willy
+ 7-10m in cap space they can spend elsewhere in the lineup, and an off-ramp for Tavares cap hit via that entry-level salary used in the top 6.
Toronto picks Dvorsky/Benson with pick 6.
It makes sense for Arizona too
Keller - Matthews - Schmatlz
Crouse - Hayton - Guenther
They have tons of prospects, at all positions coming their way + a lot of draft assets in the rest of the 2023 draft.
Trade with Colombus
Toronto picks one of Carlsson/Fantilli
Tavares - Trade with 20ishth overall for a C - Marner
Knies - Carlsson/Fantilli - Willy
+ 7-10m in cap space they can spend elsewhere in the lineup, and an off-ramp for Tavares cap hit via that entry-level salary used in the top 6.
+ Jiricek replacing one of their bad D.
It makes sense for Colombus
Gaudreau - Matthews - Marchenko/Foudy
Johnson - Roslovic - Laine
They have tons of D prospects to trade Jiricek away.
I don't think we have the assets to play on Matthews unless Suz/Caufield/Guhle are on the table, it doesn't make sense for us. We don't have a prime prospect that would fit what the Leafs could need (1 C or a 1 D). Like Chicago and Anaheim, we need time over everything else.
Do you think we will have another 700 man games lost for the 3rd year in a row?If you mean that
Gallagher ( injury prone )
Armia ( injury prone )
Edmunson ( injury prone )
Savard ( injury prone )
Allen ( injury prone )
Hoffman ( just prone )
Guhle ( injury prone )
Slafkovsky ( injury prone, rookie )
Caufield ( injury prone , major surgery )
Xhekaj ( major surgery )
Dach ( injury prone, major surgery, concussions )
Montembault ( Swiss cheese )
Barron ( rookie )
Are all going to magically have career years than yes, we should have a top 15 pick.
Blasphemy! @Bombshell11 is a witch!I really don't see the reason behind the hype
He made a few Crosby goals.... woopie doo
Love the idea of SLAF next to a guy like McDavid. Which reminds me of how bad we need a #1c because Ideally. Suzuki is a 1W or 2C IMO.Mitchkov is coming to the NHL in three years.
Connor McDavid will be a UFA in three years.
I think that Slafkovsky - McDavid - Mitchkov would be an adequate first line for the Habs.
I just think that the likelihood of us miraculously having career years for those players mentioned is way lower than them having another bad year where the next year most are gone. But we will see.. contract years etc.Do you think we will have another 700 man games lost for the 3rd year in a row?
Some terrible bad luck on that list so..................
That's what I'm afraid of. At 5th overall everyone knows there's no one remotely close to Michkov's talent level. That statement makes it seem like he's laying the foundation of his explanation/excuse of why he'll pass on him.
"Well we think Benson and Michkov both have similar ceilings, but we loved Benson's drive and motor and that's why he was our guy at 5th."
I don't see him going to Anaheim. I think he could be picked up by SJ. If not, it will be Caps or Wings at 8 or 9OA with an outside chance Arizona picks him up at 6OA. They drafted a Russian last summer.The Hughes statement about Michkov losing a tiebreaker at this point was in response to how the Russian factor would factor in to their decision, not in response to assessing his talent level.
So that he didn't say "Michkov would have to be much more talented than another player for us to pick him" was a positive for me, as someone who is literally praying every day for Michkov.
I suspect Michkov is going to San Jose or anaheim, but we'll see...
It is pretty wild how shitty the Coyotes have been, yet they've barely had any top 5 picks.
They have missed the playoffs 10 out of 11 years, with the only year they "made" the playoffs being the COVID season. Their highest picks during that period are: Strome (3), Hayton (5) and Cooley (3).
Great video scouting. I definetly want him
I don't care where he goes after us.I don't see him going to Anaheim. I think he could be picked up by SJ. If not, it will be Caps or Wings at 8 or 9OA with an outside chance Arizona picks him up at 6OA. They drafted a Russian last summer.
The main issue I have is that logically if Smith/Carlsson/Fantilli/Bedard are all of the board then that means there would be no need for a tie breaker because after that the talent gap is too wide.The Hughes statement about Michkov losing a tiebreaker at this point was in response to how the Russian factor would factor in to their decision, not in response to assessing his talent level.
So that he didn't say "Michkov would have to be much more talented than another player for us to pick him" was a positive for me, as someone who is literally praying every day for Michkov.
I suspect Michkov is going to San Jose or anaheim, but we'll see...
The way I see it is the argument that Michkov might interest Montreal is based on interpreting cryptic comments from Hughes or someone else. Whereas "all" the scoops claiming to have inside information from someone from the team suggest they're not picking him. As a comparison last season, it was not "all" Slafkovsky or Wright.The main issue I have is that logically if Smith/Carlsson/Fantilli/Bedard are all of the board then that means there would be no need for a tie breaker because after that the talent gap is too wide.
It'd be like if we won the lottery, but then management made the same statement regarding Bedard. Saying that if they feel someone else is equal in talent he might not be picked due to a tie breaker. Everyone knows he's the clear cut #1 talent, so there's no need to make that statement.