GDT: Canada (5) vs. Russia (3) • Group B • Dec. 26

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
why should it matter to us , let them enjoy their goal , they have that right
and who cares we always beat them , let them have their small victories :p

You might want to check the WJC history between Canada and Russia in the last 5 years or so. Russia has been better
 
Honestly pretty boring period considering Russia vs Canada. Canada a bit better. Thought the call against Canada was weak, but then I saw a call against Russia and said "define weak :laugh:"
 
Almost like acquiring multiple picks in a single draft improves your chances of getting better players. Benning needs to research this to see if it is indeed true.

From 2001 to 2015, Vancouver has had the fewest picks with 102. Chicago has had the most with 145.

The team with the fewest draft picks to reach 100 GP in that span is Vancouver (13). The team with the most was Columbus (31). Chicago had the second most with 30. Not exactly shocking stuff, but it goes to show that sheer volume is the single most important factor when it comes to success at the draft. More important that scouting which can be random and very susceptible to luck.

That said, Vancouveer has also had the worst success rate during that time as well, so poor scouting has contributed.
 
Not a bad period, hopefully we come out flying in the 2nd. Good pace to this game, another good Canada v Russia game.
 
Seems like only the Jost line has any real chemistry, hope Ducharme isn't afraid to throw the other 3 lines in the blender while the tournaments young if things start to go south.
I disagree with this. Three of the four lines have good chemistry imo
 
From 2001 to 2015, Vancouver has had the fewest picks with 102. Chicago has had the most with 145.

The team with the fewest draft picks to reach 100 GP in that span is Vancouver (13). The team with the most was Columbus (31). Chicago had the second most with 30. Not exactly shocking stuff, but it goes to show that sheer volume is the single most important factor when it comes to success at the draft. More important that scouting which can be random and very susceptible to luck.

That said, Vancouveer has also had the worst success rate during that time as well, so poor scouting has contributed.

Interesting. Thanks
 
From 2001 to 2015, Vancouver has had the fewest picks with 102. Chicago has had the most with 145.

The team with the fewest draft picks to reach 100 GP in that span is Vancouver (13). The team with the most was Columbus (31). Chicago had the second most with 30. Not exactly shocking stuff, but it goes to show that sheer volume is the single most important factor when it comes to success at the draft. More important that scouting which can be random and very susceptible to luck.

That said, Vancouveer has also had the worst success rate during that time as well, so poor scouting has contributed.

Can you post this on the Avs board?
 
From 2001 to 2015, Vancouver has had the fewest picks with 102. Chicago has had the most with 145.

The team with the fewest draft picks to reach 100 GP in that span is Vancouver (13). The team with the most was Columbus (31). Chicago had the second most with 30. Not exactly shocking stuff, but it goes to show that sheer volume is the single most important factor when it comes to success at the draft. More important that scouting which can be random and very susceptible to luck.

That said, Vancouveer has also had the worst success rate during that time as well, so poor scouting has contributed.

Where is the data from?

it is very interesting..
 
Bean was bruts
Jost and gauthier were great
Myers was amazing
Sergachev needs to get his ass kicked
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad