Value of: Calgary Contracts (Gaudreau, Tkachuk etc)

5 14 6 1

We are the 11.5%
Sep 15, 2010
15,029
17,544
Alberta
Calgary is having an excellent season, coinciding with some absolutely stellar performances by players in contract years.

Gaudreau - UFA
Tkachuk - RFA
Kylington - RFA
Mangiapane - RFA

What are the projected contracts for these guys?

Calgary has projected ~24M in room with 14 players signed next season.

I have to think Tkachuk and Gaudreau are looking for deals around 10M+ with their seasons.

Mangiapane doesn't have as much bartering power as an RFA but he scored 30 this year, and Kylington according to some Flames fans is their best D this year.

What do we project their deals at?
 

Double Dion

Jets fan 28/06/2014
Feb 9, 2011
11,779
4,557
I think you're looking at about the following for each player:

Gaudreau: 10M

Tkachuk: 9.25M

Mangiapane: 5.5M

Kylington: 3.5M

Total: 28.25M

In other words something has to give. My guess is either Tkachuk is traded, Gaudreau walks or one of Monahan or Lucic is moved.
 

crazyfisherman

Sharangovich fanboy
Sep 22, 2012
2,781
2,154
One of Monahan and lucic will be off the team, prob both tbh.... Id rather trade mangi if push comes to shove and hope Pelletier comes in a replaces most of that production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HitterD

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,111
5,521
I think you're looking at about the following for each player:

Gaudreau: 10M

Tkachuk: 9.25M

Mangiapane: 5.5M

Kylington: 3.5M

Total: 28.25M

In other words something has to give. My guess is either Tkachuk is traded, Gaudreau walks or one of Monahan or Lucic is moved.

Lol. In that scenario, clearly trading Monahan or Lucic is the best option. The Flames could also look at moving guys like Backlund or Dube. Assuming that Gaudreau and Tkachuk want to re-sign in Calgary, there's multiple ways to get things done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Accelleratii

Sweetpotato

Registered User
Jan 10, 2014
6,828
4,025
Edmonton
Gaudreau - UFA - 9.5/year
Tkachuk - RFA - 9/year
Kylington - RFA - 4/year
Mangiapane - RFA - 5.5/year

Just my guesses off the top of my head. Tkachuk will hold out for a huge payout.
 

Double Dion

Jets fan 28/06/2014
Feb 9, 2011
11,779
4,557
Lol. In that scenario, clearly trading Monahan or Lucic is the best option. The Flames could also look at moving guys like Backlund or Dube. Assuming that Gaudreau and Tkachuk want to re-sign in Calgary, there's multiple ways to get things done.
Most likely. I guess for me it comes down to value. If I have to attach significant assets to Monahan or Lucic I think twice about it. If Gaudreau goes I think you rebuild either way. Tkachuk for me is replaceable. Gaudreau isn't. I'm not talking about giving him away. More something like a top six winger, prospect and top 10 pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockmorton

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,111
5,521
Most likely. I guess for me it comes down to value. If I have to attach significant assets to Monahan or Lucic I think twice about it. If Gaudreau goes I think you rebuild either way. Tkachuk for me is replaceable. Gaudreau isn't. I'm not talking about giving him away. More something like a top six winger, prospect and top 10 pick.

Agreed. Without Gaudreau this team is sunk, and it's rebuild time. Tkachuk could potentially be replaced via free agency (I also agree he's more complimentary and replaceable), but that creates a massive search for his replacement, which I'd just rather avoid all together, as you could burn Gaudreau's prime trying to find that person. The chemistry on the top line is so good, the Flames such make a lot of sacrifices to keep that intact. It's a line that will probably be good for the next 3-4 years too. I would be willing to attach some assets to get rid of bad contracts. Not 1sts, but probably 2nds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flamesforcup

Double Dion

Jets fan 28/06/2014
Feb 9, 2011
11,779
4,557
Agreed. Without Gaudreau this team is sunk, and it's rebuild time. Tkachuk could potentially be replaced via free agency (I also agree he's more complimentary and replaceable), but that creates a massive search for his replacement, which I'd just rather avoid all together, as you could burn Gaudreau's prime trying to find that person. The chemistry on the top line is so good, the Flames such make a lot of sacrifices to keep that intact. It's a line that will probably be good for the next 3-4 years too. I would be willing to attach some assets to get rid of bad contracts. Not 1sts, but probably 2nds.
Agreed, I think you'd need to get a top 6 winger back in a trade. I like that chemistry too though. Tkachuk is a poor skater and it hurts back pressure. Gaudreau is great at that. Gaudreau struggles to get the puck out when it comes up his wall. Tkachuk is great at that. They both really are great at seeing lanes though, that's what makes them so good together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockmorton

RasmusAndersson

Registered User
Oct 19, 2013
2,540
834
I think it's gonna come down to whether we can move Lucic and his NTC. In a worst-case scenario we can buy out Monahan and save an extra 4 mil, but we're gonna need like 5 mil more than that. Lucic is only owed 1 mil of real money, so he would be an ideal target for a team like Ottawa or Seattle or Arizona with one year left and a high cap hit to help them reach the cap floor but low actual dollars.

Ideally buy out Monahan, do Lucic+2nd/meh prospect to Ottawa for a late pick, and then the money would work. Maybe a Lucic+Valimaki package for a pick if absolutely necessary. But if Lucic is set on staying then we're in a tough position and would have to consider moving Dube or Backlund, which I'd do way before moving Chucky unless the return was astronomical. Or Mang.

Johnny gets probs 9.5-10 mil, Chucky around 9, Mang 5 (can't see him getting much more with how cold he's been the second half of the year), and Kylington around 4. Gudbranson at 3 yrs 1.75 mil.

Gaudreau-Lindholm-Tkachuk
Mang-Backlund-Toffoli
Pelletier-Dube-Coleman
_____-Ruzicka-Lewis

Hanifin-Rasmus
Kylington-Tanev
Mackey-Gudbranson
Stone, Valimaki (unless we have to move him with Lucic)

Markstrom
Vladar
 

Voodoo Glow Skulls

Formerly Vatican Roulette
Sponsor
Sep 27, 2017
5,700
3,007
If Detroit trades for both Monahan and Lucic, what would Calgary fans think that deal would look like?
 

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
5,001
2,201
Agreed. Without Gaudreau this team is sunk, and it's rebuild time. Tkachuk could potentially be replaced via free agency (I also agree he's more complimentary and replaceable), but that creates a massive search for his replacement, which I'd just rather avoid all together, as you could burn Gaudreau's prime trying to find that person. The chemistry on the top line is so good, the Flames such make a lot of sacrifices to keep that intact. It's a line that will probably be good for the next 3-4 years too. I would be willing to attach some assets to get rid of bad contracts. Not 1sts, but probably 2nds.
Who's going to take on a massive Monahan deal for a late 2nd rd pick? No one
 

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,111
5,521
Who's going to take on a massive Monahan deal for a late 2nd rd pick? No one

Lol. Massive deal? It's one year. That one can be bought out pretty easily. The Lucic deal has $875k in actual money owing for one year.
 

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
5,001
2,201
Lol. Massive deal? It's one year. That one can be bought out pretty easily. The Lucic deal has $875k in actual money owing for one year.
Again, why would a team take on 6.75M$ of dead weight for a mere 2nd rd pick.

Buying Monahan out doesn't make the numbers work if you consider JG heading for Panarin type of money (and he can)
 

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,111
5,521
Again, why would a team take on 6.75M$ of dead weight for a mere 2nd rd pick.

Buying Monahan out doesn't make the numbers work if you consider JG heading for Panarin type of money (and he can)

Firstly, Monahan's cap hit is $6.375.

Either way two of Lucic, Monahan, and Backlund need to be moved. Monahan can be bought out. If Lucic refuses to move, then Backlund likely has to be moved. The Flames would have about $30 million in cap space if Monahan was bought out. Their situation isn't nearly as dire as people are making it out to be. They have a lot of options, in terms of moving cap around.

The Flames also have multiple players on ELCs looking ready to break into the lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RasmusAndersson

Cancuks

Former Exalted Ruler
Jan 13, 2014
4,066
3,483
At the EI office
I think Gaudreau will sign with a US team maybe the Devils. He'll be overpaid and will underachieve with his new team. Tkachuk will resign for more money than his brother. Mangiapine and Kylington as well. Monohan on LTIR or traded to Ottawa or Arizona with draft picks or a prospect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominance

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,546
39,384
i actually think Lucic makes sense even I'm not the biggest fan of the player. would help with the big issue most fans have with being too soft and having no protection.
Yep kinda thinking the same thing
 

Ledge And Dairy

Registered User
Firstly, Monahan's cap hit is $6.375.

Either way two of Lucic, Monahan, and Backlund need to be moved. Monahan can be bought out. If Lucic refuses to move, then Backlund likely has to be moved. The Flames would have about $30 million in cap space if Monahan was bought out. Their situation isn't nearly as dire as people are making it out to be. They have a lot of options, in terms of moving cap around.

The Flames also have multiple players on ELCs looking ready to break into the lineup.
I disagree that 2 of them need to be moved. 1 is easily sufficient.
QAH22qX.png
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad