BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 15,240
- 4,455
Do cities benefit from subsidizing sports arenas? Economists are skeptical. - Macleans.ca
"The research is pretty clear that there aren't aggregate benefits of such subsidies for the city as a whole,'' said Trevor Tombemacleans.ca
The Economics of Subsidizing Sports Stadiums
Proponents say subsidizing stadiums is justified because of the economic impact it will have on the community. Stadiums are huge construction projects and hold the promise of new, nearby development taking root. Despite these arguments, economists generally oppose subsidizing professional sports...research.stlouisfed.org
It’s a bad deal. Most economists take that position.
And again, saying that Albertans are hypocrites. Many of us opposed the funding towards keystone and have been upset with our government. I keep pointing out that Calgary voted for change but it falls on deaf ears. 44% of albertans in deep blue alberta voted for the f***ing NDP. And remind me, where in Gondek’s policy platform did she say she was going to let Murray Edwards and co bend over Calgarians? There hasn’t been an election to gauge public opinion, but I don’t think she holds well…
Blame the public? Get out of here man.
I thought this was pretty common knowledge at this point. If the public is on the hook for cost overruns this is gonna get real ugly. But in the end, people will end up ignoring or forgetting about it, the rich get richer, and the world keeps turning.