Conspiracy Theorist
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2016
- 5,818
- 2,056
Either way is fine. But boy has he been impressive.Hes playignin Wjc 100%. They sent back Mete last year even though he was impressive.
Either way is fine. But boy has he been impressive.Hes playignin Wjc 100%. They sent back Mete last year even though he was impressive.
I did notice that in the latter half of the game they would have someone else take the draw.Didn't see the game, but happy to read he was good. However, FO% at 14% is not an acceptable stat for a top 2 center, even against Matthews/Tavares/Kadri. Fortunately, FO skills is something eminently teachable (see Crosby, Matthews, etc)... Hopefully they will ask Plekanec to show him a few tricks.
Hes playignin Wjc 100%. They sent back Mete last year even though he was impressive.
FO% at 14% and yet 66% corsi. What do you do with FO%, anyway? Impact corsi, right?Didn't see the game, but happy to read he was good. However, FO% at 14% is not an acceptable stat for a top 2 center, even against Matthews/Tavares/Kadri. Fortunately, FO skills is something eminently teachable (see Crosby, Matthews, etc)... Hopefully they will ask Plekanec to show him a few tricks.
FO% at 14% and yet 66% corsi. What do you do with FO%, anyway? Impact corsi, right?
Like I said, did not see the game and it looks like the kid did well. However, I still think a good NHL center should not go below 45% FO wins (over long period of time, of course). While not crucial, starting with possession is quite important in hockey.
Corsi is a ratio of shot attempts at even play... I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
Like I said, did not see the game and it looks like the kid did well. However, I still think a good NHL center should not go below 45% FO wins (over long period of time, of course). While not crucial, starting with possession is quite important in hockey.
Corsi is a ratio of shot attempts at even play... I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
Also Scheifele, Barkov and Matthews had around that or even worse percentage in their first NHL seasons. If he will get around 45%, it would be in fact relatively respectable for an 18 year rookie center. Of course he needs to become better with his faceoffs, but by no means he is going to be too long as bad as he probably was with them in his first game.under 45% last season: McDavid, Malkin, MacKinnon, Kuznetsov, Barzal, Marchessault...
(edit: of course he needs to practice it, a lot, but that number doesn't tell you who is a 'good NHL center' and who isn't)
Like I said, did not see the game and it looks like the kid did well. However, I still think a good NHL center should not go below 45% FO wins (over long period of time, of course). While not crucial, starting with possession is quite important in hockey.
Corsi is a ratio of shot attempts at even play... I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
After watching Kotkaniemi, you'll notice that he seemingly always does those "lucky" thing, I think most of the time it's not luck. It's just him being a damn good player.If this play was intentional then his hockey sense is through the roof... it looks more like a lucky pick (not intentional) by his teammate stopped Kapanen from potentially poking the puck from Kotkaniemi and going in on a breakaway. I'm not sure Kotkaniemi knew that the leaf player was right behind him.
I thought he was ok, clearly he's very smart and that's great to see. Think he just needs to work on getting stronger, improving his skating and get quicker.
Domi was easily the best Hab, not even close.
I think he looks better than Draisaitl at the same age..
Realistically, what's the upside to this kid? Preferably not from a Habs fan POV
I thought he was ok, clearly he's very smart and that's great to see. Think he just needs to work on getting stronger, improving his skating and get quicker.
Domi was easily the best Hab, not even close.
If this play was intentional then his hockey sense is through the roof... it looks more like a lucky pick (not intentional) by his teammate stopped Kapanen from potentially poking the puck from Kotkaniemi and going in on a breakaway. I'm not sure Kotkaniemi knew that the leaf player was right behind him.
I think Kotka would have passed it way before it got to the breakaway point, he has tons of room to clear the puck as soon as he'd feel the danger of someone closing in on him unless his peripherals are broken. You're underrating basic hockey sense even a 4th liner could handle.
Haha basic.... Are you aware of the amount of "basic" blueline plays like thid that regularly result in breakways for opposing team?