Great pick given his potential and all the way down at our pick. But man the PTSD kicks right in seeing another rangers pick with skating concerns. Regardless still happy with this, we don’t always go BPA
Was Jason Robertson a steal? Sometimes guys go later than they should. The draft is not an exact science.I dont fully understand how he is ”steal” after 32 teams pro scouting departments observe him full time through season and as a result he is as low as he is in every teams list? As if he would fly under someones radar after he has just broken Matthews all time record.
I dont fully understand how he is ”steal” after 32 teams pro scouting departments observe him full time through season and as a result he is as low as he is in every teams list? As if he would fly under someones radar after he has just broken Matthews all time record.
I dont fully understand how he is ”steal” after 32 teams pro scouting departments observe him full time through season and as a result he is as low as he is in every teams list? As if he would fly under someones radar after he has just broken Matthews all time record.
Are you serious?I dont fully understand how he is ”steal” after 32 teams pro scouting departments observe him full time through season and as a result he is as low as he is in every teams list? As if he would fly under someones radar after he has just broken Matthews all time record.
Holy “appeal to authority” Batman!I dont fully understand how he is ”steal” after 32 teams pro scouting departments observe him full time through season and as a result he is as low as he is in every teams list? As if he would fly under someones radar after he has just broken Matthews all time record.
I dont fully understand how he is ”steal” after 32 teams pro scouting departments observe him full time through season and as a result he is as low as he is in every teams list? As if he would fly under someones radar after he has just broken Matthews all time record.
Is it really a weird thing? How else are people suppose to define “steals/reaches”? Literally nobody here has watched all these players enough to form any real opinions, not any more than the scouting services who rank the players.People base the steal/reach labels on arbitrary rankings by non-scouts. It's a weird thing.
Exactly. And while the people we read might not be scouts employed by teams, they have spent a considerable amount of time researching these prospects and in many cases consulting with scouts to form their rankings. To label the rankings as "arbitrary" is a gross misrepresentation of the rankings done by many of the prospect analysts. And we all know of teams reaching for players far from where their consensus ranking places them. That is much more arbitrary than the rankings we read.Is it really a weird thing? How else are people suppose to define “steals/reaches”? Literally nobody here has watched all these players enough to form any real opinions, not any more than the scouting services who rank the players.
If the majority if these services or legit people like Mckenzie have a player ranked 8-12, and he gets picked 22-26, then yea people are going to they the player was a steal where he was picked based on that.
Is it really a weird thing? How else are people suppose to define “steals/reaches”? Literally nobody here has watched all these players enough to form any real opinions, not any more than the scouting services who rank the players.
If the majority if these services or legit people like Mckenzie have a player ranked 8-12, and he gets picked 22-26, then yea people are going to they the player was a steal where he was picked based on that.
And Debrincat was considered and has proven to be a steal and Filip Johansson was considered and was a reach. Collectively, who is better at ranking and projecting prospects- teams or prospect analysts? All fans have to go on are rankings and draft results.Example: Joe Veleno was considered a steal, Moritz Seider was a huge reach.
Sorry, my point was more how much emphasis people put into those rankings, and simultaneously looking at it in a very black-and-white way.
A steal isn't always a good thing. A reach isn't always a bad thing.
A player can drop and be considered a steal but why does the player "drop"? Why are scouts not as high on a player as the reporters/tv personalities who put rankings together?
Example: Joe Veleno was considered a steal, Moritz Seider was a huge reach.
So what then do people not comment ever on whether players are steals or reaches on a *checks notes* hockey message board? It's like the people that invariably say "I won't grade this draft until 5 years down the line".
As usual, you completely miss the point of what I'm saying.
Listing someone a steal or reach is fine. I'm arguing against what those words mean. But go on, misinterpret what I am saying. That's your niche.
Oh?? Where was this reported?Kings wanted to trade up and nab him. No one would budge.
The mayor, one of the Kings reporters, tweeted it.Oh?? Where was this reported?
This makes me love the pick even more that I already do because I really like the Kings draft philosophy.Kings wanted to trade up and nab him. No one would budge.
I am sure the Kings were trying to move up considering they were picking late in the 2nd round. That would have been an incredible move up that many places.The mayor, one of the Kings reporters, tweeted it.