This he'll be like Stastny, without the injury problems. Simluar numbers as well.
I know he's no Yzerman, Toews or Sakic...
Seguin isn't a proven winner. In fact, he pretty much disappeared in the playoffs against Windsor. He's a center that really started getting attention in his draft year. He is most likely going to go second overall. He can score goals just as well as he can make plays. He can kill penalties.
There is only one other player in the NHL that is exactly like what was mentioned above. His name is Patrick Marleau.
Tyler Seguin = Patrick Marleau. I don't know if this is a good or bad thing.
Marleau isn't a very good comparison because his style of play is more about his physical gifts; being a fantastic skater, big, strong, etc. If you ask me, Marleau isn't a very creative offensive player. His hockey sense isn't bad, especially defensively, but he just is not a cerebral player. That's why it doesn't shock me at all that his best season comes as he's been playing the wing with two really dynamic offensive guys.Seguin isn't a proven winner. In fact, he pretty much disappeared in the playoffs against Windsor. He's a center that really started getting attention in his draft year. He is most likely going to go second overall. He can score goals just as well as he can make plays. He can kill penalties.
There is only one other player in the NHL that is exactly like what was mentioned above. His name is Patrick Marleau.
Tyler Seguin = Patrick Marleau. I don't know if this is a good or bad thing.
http://the-l-f.blogspot.com/
has a great video of Seguin. I'd be surprised if somebody watched that video and did not come away with Datsyuk.
Seguin doesn't have the unique stride that Dats does, and I think he has one more tool (a lethal one-timer), but the hockey sense and offensive zone decisionmaking is eerie. The way he'll use a d-man as a screen and wrist one from his off-foot, the way he zigs and zags entering the zone, the tricky backhand pass, etc.
I actually think Seguin will become even MORE like Datsyuk as he develops. In the OHL, he can get crazy separation on d-men, and he won't be able to do that as often in the NHL, so you'll see more east-west play. Same thing with blasting all kinds of odd-angle shots.
I don't know if he'll ever be able to freeze goalies and d-men like Dats, but who can? Same thing with picking pockets at the blue lines. But I think Tyler has a lot of Datsyuk's style in his game as a high-IQ tricky two-way playmaking center.
http://the-l-f.blogspot.com/
has a great video of Seguin. I'd be surprised if somebody watched that video and did not come away with Datsyuk.
Seguin doesn't have the unique stride that Dats does, and I think he has one more tool (a lethal one-timer), but the hockey sense and offensive zone decisionmaking is eerie. The way he'll use a d-man as a screen and wrist one from his off-foot, the way he zigs and zags entering the zone, the tricky backhand pass, etc.
I actually think Seguin will become even MORE like Datsyuk as he develops. In the OHL, he can get crazy separation on d-men, and he won't be able to do that as often in the NHL, so you'll see more east-west play. Same thing with blasting all kinds of odd-angle shots.
I don't know if he'll ever be able to freeze goalies and d-men like Dats, but who can? Same thing with picking pockets at the blue lines. But I think Tyler has a lot of Datsyuk's style in his game as a high-IQ tricky two-way playmaking center.
Datsyuk is pretty physical these days. but I agree about his goalscoring ability.I actually think Seguin is more physical and has better goal scoring ability than Datsyuk, but his ability to dangle is very similar.
Probably two top 3 picks for Phil Kessel on a rebuilding team. Horrible trade. I could of understood if Toronto was a playoff team that needed a sniper.
Trade was done last summer...the same time MOST PEOPLE THOUGHT THE LEAFS WOULD BE A PLAYOFF TEAM...**** went sour, it happens...
Its not like the trade was done at this years trade deadline....
Oh God yes.
Yzerman comparisons are thrown around way too easily/often lately.
lately? he's been a top comparison for 15 years. tim connolly was compared to yzerman. to be honest i think it was the most accurate one, connolly plays the game offensively almost exactly as yzerman did in his first 10 years. very similar skating and stick handling mixed with the playmaking. of course connolly isnt close to his legacy, but the comparison in style is a good one.
when compare them to yzerman, they are saying the guy is a bit undersized but quick with the ability to create on their own with stickhandling and vision - and the strong possibility of being a no1 center. it implies some nice dangles and the ability to snipe as well. lafontaine would be used equally as a comparison for similar players.
of course they arent likely to reach the legacy of yzerman, its a style comparison. most people around here arent old enough to remember who yzerman actually was in his 20's.
I can't really compare him to another player right now. I'd like to if he's going to be the goal scorer or the play maker or both.
One thing I've really liked about the kid is infront of the camera he's comfortable and usually ends up laughing for most of the interview. I like a guy/kid that can lose the seriousness.
EJ McGuire compared him to either Pat Kane or Joe Thornton....