ORRFForever
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2018
- 19,837
- 11,088
They have to do something with the kid. Why put him thru this?Brutal tonight...I'm just going to assume that was one of his worst games a pro...
They have to do something with the kid. Why put him thru this?Brutal tonight...I'm just going to assume that was one of his worst games a pro...
He lost a year to Covid. What's the point of having him in L.A. (losing another year) when he could be developing in the AHL? I can't wrap my mind around this.He was never a top 2 on my board, but I still want to see him succeed. However, I think it's time to start sounding the alarms. Whether it's his usage or it's Byfield himself, they have to do something or his confidence will take years to recover.
Brutal tonight...I'm just going to assume that was one of his worst games a pro...
He lost a year to Covid. What's the point of having him in L.A. (losing another year) when he could be developing in the AHL? I can't wrap my mind around this.
But why did they rush him in the first place? If they were just going to keep him on the 3rd or 4th line, there was no upside to having him in L.A..He had 45 AHL games the last two years before coming up to the Kings this year and it's pretty apparent that he gained nothing in that league to prepare him for the NHL. The Kings have a serious issue transitioning forwards from the AHL to the NHL, so it's not only a Byfield issue, almost everyone who comes up from Ontario to LA is an offensive black hole. The Kings 4 first round picks from 2017-2020 who all spent significant time in the AHL have played 82 combined games this season in the NHL and have 7 goals and 8 assists. These are players taken 2, 5, 11 and 18 overall in the draft, that stat is so ugly it's almost unbelievable, the only one who hasn't been awful offensively is Kaliyev, a player who kind of relies on one extraordinary skill and didn't need a ton of development.
If Byfield goes back to Ontario for the rest of this season and is this same player again next season as he has been this season it's not only a big problem for the Kings team next season in the immediate but you risk him busting, the history of guys taken that high with three years of nothing at the NHL level does not bode well. Now, yes the same thing could happen if he stays in the NHL, but for players such as him fighting through it at the NHL level has been proven better for development, especially for a team like the Kings.
But why did they rush him in the first place? If they were just going to keep him on the 3rd or 4th line, there was no upside to having him in L.A..
But why did they rush him in the first place? If they were just going to keep him on the 3rd or 4th line, there was no upside to having him in L.A..
Fair enough.If we had answers to that we probably wouldn't be the worst offense in the league for the last 15 or so years, heh.
I read Ontario as the OHL for a second. I sometimes just completely blank and forget that there is an Ontario in California in the Inland Empire, where the King affiliate plays.He had 45 AHL games the last two years before coming up to the Kings this year and it's pretty apparent that he gained nothing in that league to prepare him for the NHL. The Kings have a serious issue transitioning forwards from the AHL to the NHL, so it's not only a Byfield issue, almost everyone who comes up from Ontario to LA is an offensive black hole. The Kings 4 first round picks from 2017-2020 who all spent significant time in the AHL have played 82 combined games this season in the NHL and have 7 goals and 8 assists. These are players taken 2, 5, 11 and 18 overall in the draft, that stat is so ugly it's almost unbelievable, the only one who hasn't been awful offensively is Kaliyev, a player who kind of relies on one extraordinary skill and didn't need a ton of development.
If Byfield goes back to Ontario for the rest of this season and is this same player again next season as he has been this season it's not only a big problem for the Kings team next season in the immediate but you risk him busting, the history of guys taken that high with three years of nothing at the NHL level does not bode well. Now, yes the same thing could happen if he stays in the NHL, but for players such as him fighting through it at the NHL level has been proven better for development, especially for a team like the Kings.
Help me better understand your last 2 sentences, please.I'd have a very hard time seeing him at the minimum becoming an effective middle-six winger with obviously the potential for a lot more. He has a skill-set that even if he doesn't put up great numbers to find a long-time role as an effective NHLer.
A fair amount of those 15 years was more a product of team strategy more than anything. Sutter had your entire team even with high-end offensive talent playing very low-event hockey, and I'm sure any fan base would gladly take the results you got under it.If we had answers to that we probably wouldn't be the worst offense in the league for the last 15 or so years, heh.
I think these last 2 years might show to some of all the people who hope their top prospects could play in the AHL instead of being required to go back to the CHL give some second thought to it. The only previous examples of this that we had were the guys who got to play due to using the loan exemption (Honka, Sandin, A. Nylander), and the results in the case of the 2 guys we can judge with some retrospect in Honka and Nylander aren't exactly promising examples. We also had the NHLers who went back down in the 04/05 season but most of those guys were already established NHLers at 18 (Nathan Horton, Bergeron. and Brent Burns). Although, unlike the loan/lockout guys it will be almost impossible to isolate the effects since the pandemic also caused a ton of issues related to prospect development.They didn't rush him. Most 1--2 picks end up in the NHL at 18, whether they are ready to successfully play a top 6 role or not. And most of those players end up turning out fine, a recent example is Jack Hughes. QB ended up riding busses in the AHL at 18, an unusual path that was only available to a CHL player due to Covid. NJ could have had Hughes in the AHL but never sent him down despite his early massive struggles. Right or wrong, most teams prefer to have their super high picks in the NHL.
I think right now the Kings probably realize that the AHL was a mistake last year and it's not so much the potential upside to having him in the NHL it is the potential downside to having him go back to the Kings forward graveyard in Ontario and be lost again next season. He has been so lost that if the AHL were something they would consider for him he'd probably be there by now.
A fair amount of those 15 years was more a product of team strategy more than anything. Sutter had your entire team even with high-end offensive talent playing very low-event hockey, and I'm sure any fan base would gladly take the results you got under it.
but I don't see offensive IQ needed to be an elite player. It's still really early and it wouldn't surprise me if I'm wrong and he turns into a superstar. I just don't see it myself.
LA would be wise to trade Byfield right now (or at the 2022 draft) while he's still got decent value. He just looks like he's not going to measure up. Yes, he's got some physical tools, but he looks totally lost out there! Move him now and there's still a good return coming back.I am worried you are right.
It's funny...LA would be wise to trade Byfield right now (or at the 2022 draft) while he's still got decent value. He just looks like he's not going to measure up. Yes, he's got some physical tools, but he looks totally lost out there! Move him now and there's still a good return coming back.
TWO !!!!!!Scored a goal