GordieHoweHatTrick
Registered User
I see Grigorenko as a playmaker at the NHL level. Great vision and extremely creative on the offensive side of the game. How do people rate his shot power/accuracy?
Zherdev, in his prime, was an extremely effective offensive player. He was a 60+ pt player on low scoring teams. Give him a bit more support and he's easily a PPG player.
The guy was a super skilled player. Hands, shot, vision, speed. If he was ever used effectively or if he could have figured out how to play both sides of the ice he would have been an extremely effective NHLer, as I expect Grigorenko to be.
Also, if Grigorenko ends up being a consistent 30+ goal, 60+ pt player, that wouldn't be bad at all. Not every prospect is Evgeni Malkin.
Zherdev, in his prime, was an extremely effective offensive player. He was a 60+ pt player on low scoring teams. Give him a bit more support and he's easily a PPG player.
The guy was a super skilled player. Hands, shot, vision, speed. If he was ever used effectively or if he could have figured out how to play both sides of the ice he would have been an extremely effective NHLer, as I expect Grigorenko to be.
Also, if Grigorenko ends up being a consistent 30+ goal, 60+ pt player, that wouldn't be bad at all. Not every prospect is Evgeni Malkin.
Good thing I'm not the one that accused other fanbases to be jealous of them.
I see Grigorenko as a playmaker at the NHL level. Great vision and extremely creative on the offensive side of the game. How do people rate his shot power/accuracy?
Considering how defensive you get at the mere mention of it possibly contributing to what you say, it might be true.
can a mod or someone make a new thread with all this **** and bickering not in it?
Grigorenko is in the lineup tonight for Quebec.
They only got 3 wins in 9 games without him.
Damn if true![]()
I think he'll play atleast 5 games. If he shows he can compete at this level, then they'll keep him up here.
If they do 5 and he doesn't look bad, they will probably do 9.
A team can play a rookie 9 games without eating up a contract year (unless the new CBA has changed that).
Just saying.
I thought before the draft and still think that he was the best forward in the draft. Mono and the QMJHL factor saw him drop. Buffalo got a steal.
That's the case for an 82 game schedule, but i think with the shortened season they made it less. I could be wrong, tho
If they do 5 and he doesn't look bad, they will probably do 9.
A team can play a rookie 9 games without eating up a contract year (unless the new CBA has changed that).
Just saying.
He has a chance at the 0:07 mark, but can't get the Leino cross-crease pass out of his feet. He also tried to beat Miller blocker-side in his shootout attempt at 1:05, but was denied.