BCNate
Registered User
- Apr 3, 2016
- 3,416
- 3,415
He's got a mean first step.I really want so see Benning run so I hope it happens.
He's got a mean first step.I really want so see Benning run so I hope it happens.
Are you saying McTavish should be ranked around 20? Or that you would prefer to take a top-10 ranked player at 20? If the latter, who wouldn't love to have that kind of luck?I’m inclined to agree with your overarching sentiment. Beniers, a guy who some people have in their top-3, is more of a ~10 OA pick for me. I like McTavish, but I’d prefer to take him around 20 than 10.
Definitely some similarities in the heavy game game they play, but Comtois is a winger (and was in junior, too) while McTavish is a centre and could stick there in the NHL, I think. Max still can't shoot as well as McTavish does, despite having four years of development over McTavish. Max doesn't have a weak shot, it does the job, but he rarely beats a goalie from distance and that's a carryover from his play in junior. He scores almost all of his goals from the home-plate area and most from just outside the crease. McTavish can pick a corner or overpower a goalie from out past the dots.I see Max Comtois here.
I see Max Comtois here.
Max Comtois is a pretty decent player. He might be even more decent if the ducks were a good team. And for what it's worth, Comtois was compared to Ryan Smyth in one article during his draft year.
I've made the Brady Tkachuk comparison in the past in terms of play style and impact. They both live around the net and are really strong in the corner. While I don't see Mason as being as mean as Tkachuk, he's still going to be a pain to play against.
O’Reilly/Horvat style player. Can’t see him getting past CBJ.
He’s the perfect fit for Detroit. I don’t see them passing on him if he’s still available.
I assume CBJ will take the best center available at 5. If Matt Beniers is on the board at 5 they will take him, otherwise Mc Tavish.
Very good article.
Listened to multiple podcasts this weekend and heard multiple draft experts compare Mctavish to Bo Horvat.
-stylistically, Horvat was an OX for London and dominated below the circle. Horvat also had skating concerns coming out of Junior.
- much like Mctavish, Horvat also catapulted towards the top 10-15 after starting the season as low as a projected 2nd/3rd rounder for his draft.
- similar leadership qualities as well
Listened to multiple podcasts this weekend and heard multiple draft experts compare Mctavish to Bo Horvat.
-stylistically, Horvat was an OX for London and dominated below the circle. Horvat also had skating concerns coming out of Junior.
- much like Mctavish, Horvat also catapulted towards the top 10-15 after starting the season as low as a projected 2nd/3rd rounder for his draft.
- similar leadership qualities as well
Pretty sure Button compared Beniers to Horvat too, so lots of Bo Horvats to go around this year.
Is he actually better than matty beniers as a pure center? cannot understand why he's ranked 2nd on the US list for prospects and beniers fell to 6th
Could you expand on what makes him better?
so basically hes a better version of him is what you're telling me?Much better hands, much better shot, plays the slot much better. He's also more versatile. Has played in all situations, positions and different styles this season. And he hardly took a shift off.
so basically hes a better version of him is what you're telling me?
Can anybody explain his expontential rise in the draft? It's a player I haven't even heard about 2 weeks ago where people are fangirling about. If he's the next Wilson I can understand the hype but it just seems so sudden.
Can anybody explain his expontential rise in the draft? It's a player I haven't even heard about 2 weeks ago where people are fangirling about. If he's the next Wilson I can understand the hype but it just seems so sudden.