Source or links please.
http://www.hockeyprospectus.com/puck/article.php?articleid=1305
This one is post-draft: http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/50530-NHL-scouts-rerank-2012-NHL-draft.html
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=399055
None of these say anything about other teams intending to take him in the 1st, although there were comments made off-hand about it (I don't think anyone went on the record about a particular team, however); but the TSN article states that he was expected to go in the 2nd round, while the other two are rankings that put him at the bottom of the 1st or mid-2nd.
Didnt see anywhere in those links saying other teams would have taken him in the 1st round, In fact, those articles (from Fanboys) clearly show he was a real reach by all his rankings (CSB, ISS & TSN) except for Button, which all had him ranked waaaaay later.
As is now, its pretty clear the pick was a real reach. That could change, but I doubt it
My links were to show that they had all ranked him anywhere from the 2nd round onward (Majority ranked somewhere in the 2nd round).
Okay... But it just sounds a crap shoot. I think Russia is full of "big ceiling" players who don't even get drafted.
“We knew he was playing in a league where a lot of people would undervalue him,†said Weisbrod. “He was playing against weaker competition. He was playing in obscure places. We knew that would help downgrade him in some team’s minds.Didnt see anywhere in those links saying other teams would have taken him in the 1st round, In fact, those articles (from Fanboys) clearly show he was a real reach by all his rankings (CSB, ISS & TSN) except for Button, which all had him ranked waaaaay later.
As is now, its pretty clear the pick was a real reach. That could change, but I doubt it
No kidding.
He was ranked 43 as a NA skater by CSB. That would put him (Im guessing here a bit) somewhere in the 3rd round.
You guessed wrong. That would put him in the first half of the second round. Come on, 30 picks a round...
not to mention Craig button had him at 14 in his last rankomg.
43 in NORTH AMERICAN rankings. Hockey players exist outside of North America...
As a completely neutral fan I remember at the time Jankowski was one of the biggest risers in the draft. I remember TSN guys (Bob Mack I think) saying he could go late first even. He was a reach where he was picked but no one at the draft thought he would make it out of the second round
The difference between Jankowski as a project and someone like Gaudreau as a project is size. The size combined with a high ceiling will make teams take chances earlier. It's not uncommon, in fact it's a regular occurrence.He is, or should have been. And his production & development is reflective of that.
But Feaster &/or the scouts had their heads up their collective ying yangs.
It was the forward version of the Kings taking Hickey, the Oilers taking Niinimaki.
Stupid.
But not as stupid as the commentary afterward from the Flames brasssaying where he would rank in a few years time.
speculation was that Jankowski was one of the reasons New Jersey did not forfeit their pick that year. I don't have a link nor do I care to search for one but I clearly remember the Devils as being one of the teams speculated to grab him. Also in discussions I have had with an NHL amateur scout I can assure you that he was ranked top 30 in another teams list as well but their pick was top 10 and were hoping he would fall to them in round 2 but were not surprised at all when he didn't.Source or links please.
Central scouting ranking don't mean anything. What needs to be recognized is that he was a riser headed into the draft, players that are rising entering the draft often get picked ahead of where they were ranked and fallers usually get picked behind where they were ranked, it's the nature of the draft.No kidding.
He was ranked 43 as a NA skater by CSB. That would put him (Im guessing here a bit) somewhere in the 3rd round.
Central scouting ranking don't mean anything. What needs to be recognized is that he was a riser headed into the draft, players that are rising entering the draft often get picked ahead of where they were ranked and fallers usually get picked behind where they were ranked, it's the nature of the draft.
I fully expect him to be a huge bust and another reason why Feaster was fired.
Was a stupid pick then (Terevainen was still on the board along with Maata etc.), and it's still a stupid pick.
Sure he is tall and has decent hands, but his compete level seems to be really low and i don't think he will ever amount to anything at the NHL level.
Bust pick.
Terevainen was gone at pick 18, but Maata was still available. Or a player like Subban for your goaltending needs (Kipper was old even before he decided to retire out of the blue)
It was a large risk to take for Feaster and brass, and a project pick for a team that was starting to get older and go into a rebuild was not a great idea.