kabidjan18
Registered User
I could never be described as objective. Neither am I particularly offended when people disagree with me, because I understand where they're coming from.
But what I think people are wrong about when they say Kasper is low ceiling is a misunderstanding of the mechanisms by which goals are generated. Crazy plays, crazy goals against the run of play happen, but most goals are generated by possession. And possession is maintained really by 3 ways. 1. Get the puck. 2. Hold on to the puck. 3. Share the puck.
How you do those things, aesthetically, is a lot less important. Kasper's possession stats are incredible, particularly in the SHL playoffs and the WHC. And he still has a lot of aspects of his game to develop that would increase his get, his hold, and his share. So his possession stats stand to increase, which is wild.
He will score a lot of points, not because he will do all these moves and make all these crazy shots. But because his team will always be moving the puck around in the offensive zone, and just by virtue of exposure, he will accumulate points.
But what I think people are wrong about when they say Kasper is low ceiling is a misunderstanding of the mechanisms by which goals are generated. Crazy plays, crazy goals against the run of play happen, but most goals are generated by possession. And possession is maintained really by 3 ways. 1. Get the puck. 2. Hold on to the puck. 3. Share the puck.
How you do those things, aesthetically, is a lot less important. Kasper's possession stats are incredible, particularly in the SHL playoffs and the WHC. And he still has a lot of aspects of his game to develop that would increase his get, his hold, and his share. So his possession stats stand to increase, which is wild.
He will score a lot of points, not because he will do all these moves and make all these crazy shots. But because his team will always be moving the puck around in the offensive zone, and just by virtue of exposure, he will accumulate points.