Samsquanch
Raging Bull Squatch
a problem (of opinion) in the scouting world is drafting based on physical+hockey ceiling. does a players size count for more or less than individual hockey talent?
some scouts see it as size cannot be changed (mostly) and for that reason raises ceiling. i dont believe in this, i think suze is overrated and ceiling/potential should not include size unless you are talking aspects that size can definitely impact (such as hitting).
again, i think Turris is their 1C and Brown will be ready either this year or next. middle 6 safe bet who can play almost all positions
i think its a good pick for Ottawa. just a matter of if you think it was worth taking 1st round, and while i dont if Ottawa needed the size and center position enough it made sense to make the pick
Okay well 5 or 6 times compared to a few years of tape, id take the latter.
I never said he couldnt be dominant in what he did. In fact, his size allows for it quite easily. But he just isnt elite at one specific thing, at least for what I consider elite (because that word is thrown around far too much).
I dont see what is so bad about an all around big 2C behind Turris.
Brown is an elite passer, top 5 in the draft, and elite stick handler, again top 5 in the draft. NHL caliber shot. His puck protection is among the best in the draft as well. These are thoughts from a published outlet, not an unnamed family friend. See below.
http://thehockeywriters.com/logan-brown-the-next-ones-nhl-2016-draft-prospect-profile/
Go watch the under 18's if you want to see him flat out dominate.
So in other words, your entire point is basically rubbish. He's elite in some ways, and obviously very blessed in the size department.
Your family friend scout is obviously not very good, or a rebel of some kind, because not a single outlet had brown ranked as a low 1st/high second. He went right where he should have.
Last edited: