Happy to see Leo really playing well, I loved what I saw from him last year in Sweden, I thought he might need another year here but from the little I have seen him play in the big league he looks way ahead of where I thought he would be.
Carlsson is very easily a better prospect than Fantilli IMO, and that's no shade on Fantilli.I think at this point it's pretty fair to say people like myself were wrong when we thought there was a gap between Fantilli and Carlsson at this point they're equals as prospects they just bring different elements to the table
The IQ difference will likely be the separating factor that allows Carlsson to reach a higher level imo. Talent and athletic ability can only take you so far.Carlsson is very easily a better prospect than Fantilli IMO, and that's no shade on Fantilli.
Carlsson was considered the more raw prospect, as Fantilli matured much earlier than Carlsson (Fantilli could have stepped into the NHL at the beginning of last year and not looked out of place. I don't think you could say the same for Leo). But despite being behind on physical development, I think Carlsson is already the better player. He looks like a true 1C out there - his ceiling is like a Barkov/Matthews hybrid, a top 3-5 center in the league.
Fantilli has been great for the blue jackets this year, but he doesn't have that sort of potential. Top 10-15 center? Perhaps. He's a terrific prospect and already a very good player, but he's just not on Carlsson's level IMO.
Malkin, ovi and kucherov turned out okI wish my team had Carlsson, I've always had him ahead.
But you really can't brush away the fact that Bedard and Fantilli are two of the most physically precocious D+1s we've had in a long time. The physical preparation is a big part of why Carlsson is on this plan. Nice try trying to spin it as hypocrisy.
FWIW I've made countless comments over the years saying that players like Kent Johnson, Cole Sillinger and now David Jiricek need more gym and practice time and less games played. Fantilli is exempt from that because he's a freak, not because he's on my team. The Ducks are doing what I've been preaching for a long time.
Edit: I've also repeatedly made the point that the Russian model of forward development that puts training over games played is better. This comes up all the time when HFers are upset that their favorite prospect isn't getting ice time in the KHL, people have no idea how important gym and practice are relative to game time.
I wonder if the same people today complaining about how Pat handles Leo, are the ones that laughed about Pat's decision to pick Leo in the first place... I assume at least some are. In that case, one could give Pat some benefit of the doubt. You know... he actually knows a thing or two
I mean I'm kind of on the fence about the whole thing and I preferred Fantilli on draft day (though I was more open minded to Carlsson that quite a few Ducks fans). I can't say if this load management is or isn't the right thing for Leo and we'll never really know whether it was or wasn't. All I can say is it's deflating getting excited to watch Leo only to hear he's a healthy scratch. But I can also say that Leo was a smart pick by Anaheim. The Ducks clearly did their homework so, I mean, who am into question their handling of the kid in a development year?I wonder if the same people today complaining about how Pat handles Leo, are the ones that laughed about Pat's decision to pick Leo in the first place... I assume at least some are. In that case, one could give Pat some benefit of the doubt. You know... he actually knows a thing or two
I thought, and still think, Fantilli was a perfect fit for Zegras.I mean I'm kind of on the fence about the whole thing and I preferred Fantilli on draft day (though I was more open minded to Carlsson that quite a few Ducks fans). I can't say if this load management is or isn't the right thing for Leo and we'll never really know whether it was or wasn't. All I can say is it's deflating getting excited to watch Leo only to hear he's a healthy scratch. But I can also say that Leo was a smart pick by Anaheim. The Ducks clearly did their homework so, I mean, who am into question their handling of the kid in a development year?
I actually thought Fantilli had the higher absolute upside (while Carlsson had a higher floor) but I did perceive both to have 100+ point ceilings so I was willing to accept either. It's just absolutely crazy to me how good he already looks.I thought, and still think, Fantilli was a perfect fit for Zegras.
I thought Carlsson had the higher upside, but was more risky.
But, I trusted the Ducks scouts and they clearly made a good choice. Not to say Fantilli isn't going to be as good but Carlsson already looks like a complete #1 center at 18...
As a Hawks fan, I was obviously looking at Bedard, Fantilli, and Carlsson, all last season, as we had a chance to get one of those guys.Landing a player that can be a true #1C in their D+1 season is so incredibly rare that I'm still in shock the Ducks managed to get this kind of a player without the 1oa pick. As a franchise, we've never been in this position before.
This draft was not a conventional one. It has some reminiscent of 2015 with McDavid and Eichel. Eichel would have been a 1st overall in like 90% of NHL draft just like Carlsson and Fantilli are both 1st overall in like 90% of most draft.Landing a player that can be a true #1C in their D+1 season is so incredibly rare that I'm still in shock the Ducks managed to get this kind of a player without the 1oa pick. As a franchise, we've never been in this position before.
Is there a direct source saying this many games?sounds like the plan to play Leo around 40-50 games this season which will make him have no chance at calder trophy. a pity.
I think the main source said something like 2 games a week for first 2 months. Not going check the for sure numbers, but I’m guessing it’s closer to about 60-65 gamesIs there a direct source saying this many games?
It's also not even necessarily a cautious approach. By limiting the games he plays in, they give him a lot more time that he can work in the gym and develop his body to become a true dominant superstar in the years beyond this one. He looks great and is playing big minutes when he does get in, but with this regimen you have the potential to be even better for longer a year or two from now.it’s not that deep dude. The team, player and agent all agreed on this course before the season started. They are taking a cautious approach with an 18yr old kid. Nothing more to dissect here
Yeah great point as wellIt's also not even necessarily a cautious approach. By limiting the games he plays in, they give him a lot more time that he can work in the gym and develop his body to become a true dominant superstar in the years beyond this one. He looks great and is playing big minutes when he does get in, but with this regimen you have the potential to be even better for longer a year or two from now.
I think it's fair to say that Michkov could have gotten first overall in many drafts if not for certain extraordinary factors at play. And Will Smith would easily be a top 3 pick in a lot of drafts. Crazy stacked draft year.This draft was not a conventional one. It has some reminiscent of 2015 with McDavid and Eichel. Eichel would have been a 1st overall in like 90% of NHL draft just like Carlsson and Fantilli are both 1st overall in like 90% of most draft.
It's also not even necessarily a cautious approach. By limiting the games he plays in, they give him a lot more time that he can work in the gym and develop his body to become a true dominant superstar in the years beyond this one. He looks great and is playing big minutes when he does get in, but with this regimen you have the potential to be even better for longer a year or two from now.
Congrats Ducks fans, the future is bright and I hope for a long and successful career for Leo. Really happy to see all of CBJ, CHI, and ANA, happy with how it has turned out.
As I'm re-reading the quotes, it seems they may actually be hoping he can be better later this season.
It's a pretty rare scenario. Really there was no going wrong for the top 3. Relief from Ducks fans at finishing last was more about being assured one of those guys, rather than the still less than 50% chance at Bedard.
I like all 3 guys, and at times envisioned each of them on my team, so I find myself strangely a fan of all 3 players now and hope that they all have successful careers. The only real disappointment is that there was no way to get more than one of these players.