Nope. We're just getting started.Are people ready to stop naming all their kids Conor yet jesus
At the end of a long day, there's nothing better than making another baby and naming it Conor.
Nope. We're just getting started.Are people ready to stop naming all their kids Conor yet jesus
Or he'll be top 5 and ahead of Savoie from the get go on Bobs list hahaYa the kid is gonna sky rocket in all rankings as the season goes on. I wouldn't doubt if he cracks the top 5 by mid season rankings come out
I know everyone loves Savoie, but I think Geekie passes him in rankings eventually and is taken before him. My prediction!!
How does he compare to Dach or Draisaitl or Cozens?Or he'll be top 5 and ahead of Savoie from the get go on Bobs list haha
All are slightly different in strength and weakness but are on similar levels. Geekie doesn't have the skating question Draisaitl had but not quite as high IQ. Dach is the closest skill wise but Geekie imposes his size better while Dachs puck skills are slightly better. I'd have those 3 even with Cozens behind them, I personally had Krebs over Cozens but injury made him fall.How does he compare to Dach or Draisaitl or Cozens?
I’ve watched all but one of his games so far. This is a very special prospect. Hope my Yotes end up with him when they lose the draft lottery. Dylan Guenther and Conor Geekie would be a heckuva way to kick off a rebuild.
Gotta get Quentin Musty next year, to complete the trio of terrible surnames. A future line of Musty-Geekie-Guenther would be something. LOLIndeed, not bad.
I find it weird how he’s a mid 1st rounder on so many top analyst lists. He’s got a lot of skill, he’s a legit 6’4” power centre, he had a really good D-1 season, and is off to a hot start in his draft year. When I watch the Ice I see 1C upside, someone mentioned Eric Staal and I like that comp. I continue to think he’s got a good shot to be a top 5 pick.
NHL GMs love big centres with well rounded games. People keeping being surprised with how high guys like Mason McTavish, Kirby Dach, Kotka, PLD, Scheifele, etc. go, but they shouldn’t be. Seems like almost every year there’s a big, well rounded centre going significantly higher than analysts predict, this year I think it’ll be Geekie (that, or he’ll simply rise on analyst lists by draft day).
Gotta get Quentin Musty next year, to complete the trio of terrible surnames. A future line of Musty-Geekie-Guenther would be something. LOL
I felt the same way about Geekie this cycle as I did about Stutzle... I was praying for my Wings to end up with him when we inevitably lost the lottery but he flew up the draft boards after having a stellar season. He has an extremely coveted combination of size and skill and plays a game that should translate to C if all things go well. Geekie and Raymond would be some pretty good building blocks for us too.I’ve watched all but one of his games so far. This is a very special prospect. Hope my Yotes end up with him when they lose the draft lottery. Dylan Guenther and Conor Geekie would be a heckuva way to kick off a rebuild.
Hope he is the Ducks pick. He would be a perfect compliment to Zegras.
Tkachuk-Geeke-Batherson
Stutzle-Norris-Boucher
Sounds like an interesting lineup.
Does he have #1C upside?
It seems like it’d make sense to play Stuetzle at center, and that’s the top two center spots solved. Can move others to winger.
+ PintoTkachuk-Geeke-Batherson
Stutzle-Norris-Boucher
Sounds like an interesting lineup.
Does he have #1C upside?
Stutzle seems most destined to play on the wing according to DJ.
+ Pinto