please refer to my prior post where I explain myself instead of me putting vague BS like a quack.
In your previous post you say he should be a 9.5, which means you think he doesn't have a chance to be a generational player, which IMO is wrong.
The ratings, to me at least, mean this:
A= Guaranteed
B= Very likely
C=Good chance
So saying he is a 10C certainly isn't a stretch since he obviously has the tools, I just dont think he completely puts it together.
Going by that I like the 10C. I dont like the "drop 2 ratings" part of C tho. Still believe at worst, McDavid is a 9. To be honest, being a HUMONGOUS BIG (Bryz) McDavid fan, I'd give him a 10B, but I feel compelled to temper my expectations.
No way he should be a C. 9.5 or 10 B.
Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I was trying to say that I don't think McDavid should drop below 9. YES McDavid absolutely should be a 10 but its only a good to fair chance he becomes 10 while there is almost a certainty he will be a perrenial all star. AKA B. I'm quite used to HF's projection system. However, it IS a matter of ones opinions in the end.
People need to relax. Crosby was a 10C, Ovechkin a 9A and Malkin a 9B. Given how their respective careers turned out, I'd say these rankings were for the most part fairly accurate. Unless you feel like these guys were severely underrated back then as prospects, I don't see how you could possibly say McDavid is a 10B. 10B means he's a guaranteed superstar, and should end up a generational player if all goes well. I think that's going overboard a bit.
People need to relax. Crosby was a 10C, Ovechkin a 9A and Malkin a 9B. Given how their respective careers turned out, I'd say these rankings were for the most part fairly accurate. Unless you feel like these guys were severely underrated back then as prospects, I don't see how you could possibly say McDavid is a 10B. 10B means he's a guaranteed superstar, and should end up a generational player if all goes well. I think that's going overboard a bit.
No way he should be a C. 9.5 or 10 B.
Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I was trying to say that I don't think McDavid should drop below 9. YES McDavid absolutely should be a 10 but its only a good to fair chance he becomes 10 while there is almost a certainty he will be a perrenial all star. AKA B. I'm quite used to HF's projection system. However, it IS a matter of ones opinions in the end.
In your previous post you say he should be a 9.5, which means you think he doesn't have a chance to be a generational player, which IMO is wrong.
The ratings, to me at least, mean this:
A= Guaranteed
B= Very likely
C=Good chance
So saying he is a 10C certainly isn't a stretch since he obviously has the tools, I just dont think he completely puts it together.
goal and 2 primary assists ten minutes in the game...![]()
goal and 2 primary assists ten minutes in the game...![]()
He could easily end up as an 8. An 8 is a Jason Spezza/Patrick Marleau type of player. Considering Jason Spezza peaked at about 90 points in 68 games, or well over 100 point pace, I don't think that's a stretch to say he could end up as "bad" as that.
This is silly. Easily he could end up at that rate? Based on what? The endless possibilities of the universe? It could happen but its much more likely he is a top center by the time he turns 19 than he has jason spezza's career.
This is silly. Easily he could end up at that rate? Based on what? The endless possibilities of the universe? It could happen but its much more likely he is a top center by the time he turns 19 than he has jason spezza's career.