Semantics
PUBLIC ENEMY #1
Or hes getting older and rounding out his game? What Crosby did over 40 games does not mean he would have kept up that pace at all. This is why using the "on pace for" argument is weak.
Yeah this is the part where you should probably actually look at the numbers and see how staggering they are bud. At 66 points in 40 games even if he dropped off and only scored at his *career average* the rest of that year he'd have hit 125 points and topped the league by a landslide. I'm not actually assuming he'd have kept up that pace and scored 135 points. In fact, he'd already gone into a bit of a slump right before the injury - he was on pace for 140-150 points for most of the first 40 games that year IIRC.
Maybe you don't know how hockey works? He just scored 104 points when no one else even got 90.
He was 17 points ahead of second place.. that isn't a small number.
Yup, if he's that dominant now, just imagine how dominant he would be if he hadn't suffered the concussion and seen his goal totals fall flat as a result. Instead of 36 goals last year you'd be looking at 50-60. That's 31-41 points ahead of second place.. that isn't a small number.