Why would I have to trade Suzuki or Caufield anymore with Bedard then with Carlsson if he is as good as you say he is? he will be plenty expensive.
And regardless if would have to or not, you take the best player available, it's silly not to. This isn't some bughatti vs lamborghini argument.............Bedard has shown he is head and shoulders above every prospect aside from Maybe just maybe Michkov, why on earth wouldn't you take this level of player? it's just plain dumb not to. Suzuki, no Suzuki it makes no difference, you would be a dolt not to take the clear top player with the top pick.
And let's say you are right and carlsson is better then bedard, according to what you just said here in your post isn't Suzuki gong to have to get used to playing on the 2nd line if that happens?
I'll you what;s cute, if Hughes does get the first pick and he doesn't take bedard, that's what would be cute, wait and see what would go down if that happened it, won't be pretty.................for him. Not that it would ever happen because he's not crazy if he gets the first pick he will be taking Bedard, you can be 100% sure of that,
Cmon, you can't being serious here.