Okay, so they did that.
And what if another generational player dominates in a different manner? A sample of 2 is completely meaningless for drawing such specific conclusions.
Also, might I mention WJC-u20 domination? Or let me guess, generational players didn't dominate like that so Bedard doing so was a negative? Let me guess, generational players weren't such good goal-scorers, so Bedard being so good at scoring goals means he's not generational? Did you address Bedard being over 50% of his team's scoring while McDavid was 36%, also? Let me guess, Bedard's not generational because he's contributing too much.
You really need to learn something about statistics, you can't concentrate on such ridiculously specific things with such samples. Maybe if there were 3k generational players all of whom were ES scoring machines it'd be enough to draw such specific conclusions from.
You're focused on one single thing ignoring everything else. Seems like you're looking for stats to aid with your conclusions rather than drawing conclusions from stats, aka misuse of statistics.