habsrule4eva3089
Registered User
- Nov 22, 2008
- 4,274
- 1,081
WHL shot leaders:It's early, but based on his production so far it doesn't look like he's taken that step to be a Lemieux/Lindros/Crosby/McDavid level junior player in his draft year.
Have you considered that perhaps the reason he's able to take so many shots is because many of them are low quality opportunities and hence don't have as high a scoring expectation? I think it's a bit unrealistic to just assume that a player's going to score on all of their shots at the same rate and that the goal should be to just increase the shot volume. Most volume shooters have a lower shooting %. Take Ovechkin, who is considered to have a great shot - his career shooting % is under 13. Matthews is an exception, but he's the best in NHL at getting high danger scoring chances.WHL shot leaders:
Bedard 62
Lisowsky 32
Hyland 28
That's pretty outrageous.
Bedard is only shooting at 11.2%. That number should be closer to 15-20% with his shot. So his 7g 17p should probably be more like 10g 20p. He started pretty cold last season as well - I still think he's going to finish with 65+ goals and 130+ points if he plays 60+ games.
He's going to have a big season, but he's never been on the level of players you listed. He's in the Matthews tier, which is still an elite franchise player.
Goals per game last season:You can't really compare numbers with different eras but also the whl is by far the toughest of the 3 chl leagues to score in.
He shot at 15.6% last year despite a really cold start. He shot at nearly 19% over his last 40 games last year, averaging about a goal per game. That's not the numbers of a volume shooter.Have you considered that perhaps the reason he's able to take so many shots is because many of them are low quality opportunities and hence don't have as high a scoring expectation? I think it's a bit unrealistic to just assume that a player's going to score on all of their shots at the same rate and that the goal should be to just increase the shot volume. Most volume shooters have a lower shooting %. Take Ovechkin, who is considered to have a great shot - his career shooting % is under 13. Matthews is an exception, but he's the best in NHL at getting high danger scoring chances.
Now, perhaps 11.2% is a bit low, but expecting it to average 17.5% or whatever is in my opinion somewhat unrealistic. Furthermore, for his NHL projection, I think that looking at just the shot isn't all that important. What's important is how good he's at getting to the danger areas for high quality scoring chances.
Comparing him to McDavid is a bit iffy since McDavid had better support around him. The Pats are a mess.
It's sad that they've got a franchise-level prospect, maybe someone that can claw his way into that generational bracket, and they've been so bad with improving the team that an improvement is maybe a .500 team.They seem to be a little bit better this year, but I can't see them being much more than a .500 team.
It's sad that they've got a franchise-level prospect, maybe someone that can claw his way into that generational bracket, and they've been so bad with improving the team that an improvement is maybe a .500 team.
They seem to be a little bit better this year, but I can't see them being much more than a .500 team.
As of today, he’s already just a better Cole Caufield.Playing devil’s advocate:
1. Is he big enough to make an impact right away.
2. Most of his goals are shooting from the high slot in zone entries. Will NHL Ds close the gap and take away the high slot from him?
careful, man, Montreal fans still think he's goodAs of today, he’s already just a better Cole Caufield.