C Connor Bedard - Regina Pats, WHL (2023 Draft) Part 4

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,923
35,520
**or compliments
QMJHL was an infamously poor league at the time. It still is the weakest of the CHL leagues.
It wasn't that much weaker. Today's WHL is actually much higher scoring than the 2004-05 QMJHL:

Goals per game:
WHL 22-23
6.95

QMJHL 04-05
6.38

Crosby also dropped 6g 11p in 5 games vs the best teams in the OHL and WHL (including arguably the best junior team assembled in the modern era in the London Knights), which is pretty much the same PPG that Bedard currently has in the WHL.
 

JasonDemersWasOkay

Awaiting the return of my team
Nov 14, 2018
3,554
6,513
Bedard has 27 goals and 64 points in his first 28 games this year.
Crosby had 41 goals and 98 points in his final 28 games of his draft year.

He's not a Crosby level prospect.
Those stats for Crosby are insane but wasn’t the Q a pretty weak league in that era? Plus Rimouski was a powerhouse in crosby’s draft year, which Regina isn’t.

Crosby at 17 was probably better overall but I’ve personally never seen a 17 year old like this aside from mcdavid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,935
26,957
Five Hills
Those stats for Crosby are insane but wasn’t the Q a pretty weak league in that era? Plus Rimouski was a powerhouse in crosby’s draft year, which Regina isn’t.

Crosby at 17 was probably better overall but I’ve personally never seen a 17 year old like this aside from mcdavid.

Regina is definitely pretty tough to watch outside of Bedard, Svozil and Howe. Suzdalev is okay but nothing special. Wouldn't surprise me at all if Bedard, Svozil and Howe are the only players from that team that sniff any NHL time.

Can't say I know exactly how Crosby's team was viewed at the time but they seemed to be spearheaded by him pretty heavily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,437
16,842
It wasn't that much weaker. Today's WHL is actually much higher scoring than the 2004-05 QMJHL:

Goals per game:
WHL 22-23
6.95

QMJHL 04-05
6.38

Crosby also dropped 6g 11p in 5 games vs the best teams in the OHL and WHL (including arguably the best junior team assembled in the modern era in the London Knights), which is pretty much the same PPG that Bedard currently has in the WHL.
It's not really about the league being higher scoring, it's about the league being weaker. OHL's the highest scoring league and also the strongest so using this scoring rate argument is a bit strange. Liiga's much lower scoring than NHL but NHL obviously is harder to score in than Liiga.
 

Gold Standard

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
2,385
2,285
I just checked

He had 59 points in his first 28 games of his draft year
so, using an honest apples to apples comp, first 28 games as 17 year old draft eligible players, Bedard has Sid beat by a few points. interesting indeed,

Next two games will be a blast. Hopefully he's playing for gold.

That game last night was a classic. one for the ages,
 

cupface52

Registered User
Jan 12, 2008
4,451
692
Burlington, On
It wasn't that much weaker. Today's WHL is actually much higher scoring than the 2004-05 QMJHL:

Goals per game:
WHL 22-23
6.95

QMJHL 04-05
6.38

Crosby also dropped 6g 11p in 5 games vs the best teams in the OHL and WHL (including arguably the best junior team assembled in the modern era in the London Knights), which is pretty much the same PPG that Bedard currently has in the WHL.

Looking at the top 100 scorers of the QMJHL in '05. Notable players, Latendresse, Brassard(rookie), Radulov(rookie), Krejci(rookie), there might be a couple 13th forwards I missed. Yes, the QMJHL was MUCH lower QoC compared to the other two leagues.

What about Crosby's first 28?

First 28 games Crosby had 62 points.
First 28 games Bedard had 64 points.

Why do you think he purposely chose his final 28 games?
 

Gold Standard

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
2,385
2,285
Looking at the top 100 scorers of the QMJHL in '05. Notable players, Latendresse, Brassard(rookie), Radulov(rookie), Krejci(rookie), there might be a couple 13th forwards I missed. Yes, the QMJHL was MUCH lower QoC compared to the other two leagues.



First 28 games Crosby had 62 points.
First 28 games Bedard had 64 points.

Why do you think he purposely chose his final 28 games?


It's pretty obvious. but a completely pathetic LOL attempt on the poster's part.
 

Kiekura

Registered User
Oct 6, 2013
999
1,078
Looking at the top 100 scorers of the QMJHL in '05. Notable players, Latendresse, Brassard(rookie), Radulov(rookie), Krejci(rookie), there might be a couple 13th forwards I missed. Yes, the QMJHL was MUCH lower QoC compared to the other two leagues.



First 28 games Crosby had 62 points.
First 28 games Bedard had 64 points.

Why do you think he purposely chose his final 28 games?

Wasn't that same guy saying he is like Jack Hughes level prospect?
 

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,935
26,957
Five Hills
It's pretty obvious. but a completely pathetic LOL attempt on the poster's part.

There's always someone. No matter who it is there is always someone who tries to get ahead of the pack on the off chance a player doesn't live up to their draft hype so they can claim that they knew it all along. It was there with McDavid, Matthews, Kane, even Crosby. Heck even Gretzky had doubters.

Then if they don't live up to it they won't let you forget that they called that shot. But they'll be crickets if their wrong.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,923
35,520
**or compliments
What about Crosby's first 28?
Because Crosby got injured in early October and it took him about a month to get back to where he was. Anyone who actually followed him back then knows this.

Before that injury he had 22 points in his first 7 games. He only had 6 points in his first 5 games back from injury.

Until Bedard drops 3.5 PPG over a 25+ game sample, he's not on Crosby's level.

Why do you think he purposely chose his final 28 games?
It's pretty obvious. but a completely pathetic LOL attempt on the poster's part.
See above.

Jeez did nobody actually follow hockey back then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: majormajor

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,923
35,520
**or compliments
It's not really about the league being higher scoring, it's about the league being weaker. OHL's the highest scoring league and also the strongest so using this scoring rate argument is a bit strange. Liiga's much lower scoring than NHL but NHL obviously is harder to score in than Liiga.
I know, but the level of offensive output being so different helps to offset the fact that it's a weaker league.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,623
22,092
Because Crosby got injured in early October and it took him about a month to get back to where he was. Anyone who actually followed him back then knows this.

Before that injury he had 22 points in his first 7 games. He only had 6 points in his first 5 games back from injury.

Until Bedard drops 3.5 PPG over a 25+ game sample, he's not on Crosby's level.



See above.

Jeez did nobody actually follow hockey back then?

You don’t think this WJC is going to give him.a massive boost?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dion TheFluff

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
8,705
13,767
Canada
There's always someone. No matter who it is there is always someone who tries to get ahead of the pack on the off chance a player doesn't live up to their draft hype so they can claim that they knew it all along. It was there with McDavid, Matthews, Kane, even Crosby. Heck even Gretzky had doubters.

Then if they don't live up to it they won't let you forget that they called that shot. But they'll be crickets if their wrong.
My dad always told me how he went with my grandpa to see the Sault vs London. My grandpa thought Gretz was a bum. My dad always laughed at that...said Gretzky was skating faster backwards then anyone was forwards.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Breakfast of Champs

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,735
6,487
Visit site
It wouldn't be a prospect thread without the myth of the Q being a weaker, offensive-minded league and posters throwing out "kitchen sink" levels of cherry-picked stats.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,735
6,487
Visit site
Because Crosby got injured in early October and it took him about a month to get back to where he was. Anyone who actually followed him back then knows this.

Before that injury he had 22 points in his first 7 games. He only had 6 points in his first 5 games back from injury.

Until Bedard drops 3.5 PPG over a 25+ game sample, he's not on Crosby's level.

Wait a second. I thought it was all about physical attributes and potential for development at the NHL level and not about numbers?

You have made a point to not acknowledge Bedard's relative domination in the W.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,923
35,520
**or compliments
Wait a second. I thought it was all about physical attributes and potential for development at the NHL level and not about numbers?

You have made a point to not acknowledge Bedard's relative domination in the W.
Yeah I've never done that

I'm aware it's quite rare, but Bedard is the best goal scorer to come out of the WHL in decades.

If he plays 60 games with Suzdalev, 70 goals is definitely in reach. He just dropped 51 in 62 games as a 16 year old without that sort of supporting talent.
 

Breakfast of Champs

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,119
3,292
Because Crosby got injured in early October and it took him about a month to get back to where he was. Anyone who actually followed him back then knows this.

Before that injury he had 22 points in his first 7 games. He only had 6 points in his first 5 games back from injury.

Until Bedard drops 3.5 PPG over a 25+ game sample, he's not on Crosby's level.



See above.

Jeez did nobody actually follow hockey back then?
The amount of mental gymnastics you're putting yourself through to try to (unsuccessfully) convince people Bedard isn't a generational talent is quite amusing.

He's right there with the greatest prospects of all time. Maybe he will never be as great as Crosby, but at this point he's given people reason to believe he could be. The WJC isn't nothing - and bedard has been far better at it than Sid was, while putting up similar performance to Crosby at the CHL level. Nothing he can do will sway your predetermined opinion, even before this tournament, that he wasn't a generational talent
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,735
6,487
Visit site
The ‘Q’ is weak. There is a reason a lot of their top talent is bolting to the USHL/NCAA.

They have won more Memorial Cups than the O or the W in the last 25 years. In any event, any talk that Crosby benefitted from playing in a weaker league was thrown out the window with his historic rookie season and Art Ross win in his 2nd year.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,923
35,520
**or compliments
The amount of mental gymnastics you're putting yourself through to try to (unsuccessfully) convince people Bedard isn't a generational talent is quite amusing.

He's right there with the greatest prospects of all time. Maybe he will never be as great as Crosby, but at this point he's given people reason to believe he could be. The WJC isn't nothing - and bedard has been far better at it than Sid was, while putting up similar performance to Crosby at the CHL level. Nothing he can do will sway your predetermined opinion, even before this tournament, that he wasn't a generational talent
If he continues to improve his skating and has a back half of season like true generational players have had, I will gladly grant him generational status.

But an elite WJC performance is not enough to propel a franchise level prospect to a generational prospect.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Le Golie

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad